Posted on 03/14/2010 12:04:10 PM PDT by etraveler13
4 Cases have been decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that define the status of Natural Born Citizen.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Here is a stretch...you can google Obama Sr divorce papers. It comes up on the first page.
FYI, divorces can happen by publication, and many happen if the father cannot be found....
See, we call em “After-Birthers”...LOL
The worst thing in court or law is some fool thinking that non-governing citations make law. 8 USC 1401 is the governing law. Period.
bump
What do you mean?
IMO (just from reading about this obsessively since summer 2008) is that once the tide of public opinion really turns even more against him, those who know will start speaking up and judges will find their respective anatomies.
What are all of these about, James???? Don’t you like the words of the Supreme Court on the matter??? You have been asking for them for weeks now and here they are. Take some time with them — let them soak into your consciousness. Quit running away from the truth —
I like the words of the U.S. Supreme Court just fine. I don’t always agree with every decision that they make, but I respect every decision that they issue as the law of the land.
There have been eight different Obama eligibility cases that have been presented for Justices’ conferences at the US Supreme Court. They are among those on the list that I posted. And that’s the truth! ;-)
(1) “Berg v. Obama et al”
(2) “Beverly v. FEC”
(3) “Craig v. US”
(4) “Donofrio v Wells”
(5) “Herbert v. Obama et al”
(6) “Lightfoot v. Bowen”
(6) “Schneller v. Cortes”
(7) “Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz”
It would probably be more effective if the current Justices of the Supreme Court (particularly the five conservatives) took some time with those words that you reference and if THEY let them “soak in,” don’t you think?
I haven’t read the legal briefs in the eight cases that have already reached the Supreme Court but I would imagine that the Justices have read those words and seen reference to those 4 cases that define “natural born citizen” in the briefs submitted by plaintiffs seeking the ouster of Obama from the White House as ineligible. Thus far, the Justices appear to not have been as moved by those words as you are.
James appears game.
The quote I gave from the majority opinion did refer to a "natural-born subject" in England. Since it was also making the point that this application to children of aliens extended through hundreds of years of common law to our own law, it is clear that the majority opinion was indeed encompassing "natural born citizens" with this definition.
Making this even more clear is the fact that the (2-justice) minority opinion specifically rejected the majority definition of "natural born citizen".
With that logic every woman should need a SCOTUS decision before she can have an abortion.
Thank you for posting John Charlton’s fine article: 4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen.”
“I say, that in order be be of the country, it is NECESSARY that a person be born of a FATHER who is a CITIZEN, for if he is born there of a STRANGER, it will be ONLY the PLACE of his birth, and NOT HIS COUNTRY” ... Vattel
(Emphases mine)
STE=Q
If they had, the Chicago thugs cleverly would have whipped out the RACE CARD, immediately!!!
Ah — I missed you there, James. Trials are trials and opinions are opinions. Do you disagree with etraveler’s take? Did the four justices, or did they not, offer opinions that would disagree with Obama’s alleged eligability?
With that logic every woman should need a SCOTUS decision before she can have an abortion.
You don't need a new decision for every circumstance.
Wow! I never knew divorce papers proved paternity!
http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/ObamaBirthStarBulletin.jpg
Whoa, sorry, I had you mixed up with some one else,
In the end the dems will turn him out. Ala Julius Cesaer.
Decisions have been made regarding what defines NBC, you posted it hasn’t been addressed specifically for bammie.
You don’t need a new decision for every circumstance.
And YOUR point is???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
