Skip to comments.
Stillpoint
Posted on 02/03/2010 4:06:49 AM PST by Zaarenoc
Keep your eyes on Leo Panetta.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhocia; cia; end; is; near; panetta; stillpoint
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: Bean Counter
Please BC my sides are hurting.
41
posted on
02/03/2010 5:24:48 AM PST
by
Redhd2
To: Daffynition; paulycy; backhoe; Salamander; Slings and Arrows; Markos33
Because - Leo's keeping his eyes on
you
(He wants his "n" back - NOW!)
42
posted on
02/03/2010 5:34:02 AM PST
by
shibumi
(Health and well being for S. and L. - in Jesus name we pray!)
To: Zaarenoc
"Keep your eyes on Leo Panetta." You don't saaaaaaaaaaaaay.
43
posted on
02/03/2010 5:34:03 AM PST
by
Matchett-PI
(Sowell's book, Intellectuals and Society, eviscerates the fantasies that uphold leftist thought)
To: shibumi
44
posted on
02/03/2010 5:38:05 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
To: kingattax
RIP, Popcorn.
You served your country well.
To: doodad; raybbr
“Has anybody else noticed a bunch of seemingly older accounts that have apologetic or in defense posts of libs and Barack in particular lately? “
Yeah, whazzup with that?
IBTZ
46
posted on
02/03/2010 5:41:08 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
To: Matchett-PI
HAHAHA! Great gif! Salute!
47
posted on
02/03/2010 5:41:49 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
To: raybbr
He finally has something to say?
48
posted on
02/03/2010 5:41:52 AM PST
by
Jabba the Nutt
(Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
To: Zaarenoc
49
posted on
02/03/2010 5:41:53 AM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: Zaarenoc
50
posted on
02/03/2010 5:44:35 AM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: stephenjohnbanker; doodad; Jim Thompson; Jim Robinson
I have seen these accounts before. I am starting to think that Jim Thompson and/or someone high up in FR is creating, ,or has created these accounts, to give anonymity to certain whistleblowers. Not all of them - just the occasional account.
I am not sure about this one. It does seem awful strange that an account started twelve years ago and has no other activity all of sudden pops up.
Or, it could be an account that the data was lost during one of the past crashes.
Of course, it could be a hacker too.
With FR all things are almost usually possible.
51
posted on
02/03/2010 5:49:46 AM PST
by
raybbr
To: raybbr
My first thought was a hacker. I don’t know if this is possible, but it sure is a mystery ;-)
52
posted on
02/03/2010 5:54:23 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
To: raybbr
All the ones I have noticed are people that I have talked with or read their posts in the past and there is an incongruity in the style and certainly opinion.
Most are subtlely in defense of dems with an offhand kind of style.
53
posted on
02/03/2010 5:54:25 AM PST
by
doodad
To: raybbr
All the ones I have noticed are people that I have talked with or read their posts in the past and there is an incongruity in the style and certainly opinion.
Most are subtlely in defense of dems with an offhand kind of style.
54
posted on
02/03/2010 5:54:31 AM PST
by
doodad
To: Zaarenoc
Hey, Z - this you?
Login
Hey there! zaarenoc is using Twitter.
Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving zaarenoc's tweets.
zaarenoc
|
55
posted on
02/03/2010 5:54:51 AM PST
by
raybbr
To: stephenjohnbanker; doodad; raybbr
Has anybody else noticed a bunch of seemingly older accounts that ... Is there a rationale to maintaining the viability of inactive accounts? ... inactive accounts that are "virgin" over some period of, say, months? If someone creates an account presumably to post or reply, seems to me that they should use it within a month or so, or lose it (if they are legit, they can start over).
56
posted on
02/03/2010 5:57:20 AM PST
by
C210N
(A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
To: Zaarenoc; raybbr
zaarenoc
Rob Reiner
57
posted on
02/03/2010 6:06:14 AM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: C210N
Even one year. That would work for those who travel on business or some other excuse.
58
posted on
02/03/2010 6:13:22 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
To: paulycy
59
posted on
02/03/2010 6:14:11 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
To: Bigh4u2
This thread is useless hilarious and should be pulled archived.
60
posted on
02/03/2010 6:22:48 AM PST
by
pgyanke
(You have no "rights" that require an involuntary burden on another person. Period. - MrB)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
