Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Sun Also Flares - If we get hit with a once-in-a-century solar storm, we’re history.
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE ^ | January 28, 2010 | Clifford D. May

Posted on 01/28/2010 11:30:12 AM PST by neverdem

If we get hit with a once-in-a-century solar storm, we’re history.

 

Had the earthquake that hit Haiti shaken Florida instead, the death toll would not have been so tragically high — over 150,000 at last count. In Haiti, as in other impoverished countries, buildings are often shoddily constructed, infrastructure is weak, and governance is incompetent. The primary response to disaster: Wait for help from abroad.

It’s a well established rule: Rich nations endure natural disasters better than poor nations. But there may be an exception. Stay with me for a moment and you’ll see what I mean.

In recent years, Americans have become dependent not just on electricity but on computers, microchips, and satellites. The infrastructure that supports all this has become increasingly sophisticated — but not more resilient. On the contrary, as this infrastructure has become more complex, it also has become more fragile and therefore more vulnerable — an Achilles’ heel.

That is why, in 2001, the U.S. government established a commission to “assess the threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) attack.” Such an attack would involve the detonation of a nuclear warhead at high altitude over the American mainland, producing a shockwave powerful enough to knock out electrical power, electronics, communications, transportation, refrigeration, water-pumping stations, sewage systems, and much more. Think of a blackout, but one of indefinite duration — because we have no plan for recovery and could expect little or no help from abroad.

Historian William R. Forstchen researched what America would be like in the aftermath of an EMP attack for his novel One Second After. I don’t think I’m spoiling the experience for prospective readers by telling you that Forstchen is convinced the result would be millions of deaths from starvation and disease, a catastrophe from which America would never fully recover.

The EMP commission also reported that Iran — which is feverishly working to acquire nuclear weapons — has conducted tests in which it launched missiles and exploded warheads at high altitudes. The CIA has translated Iranian military journals in which EMP attacks against the U.S. are explicitly discussed.

Might Iran’s rulers orchestrate such an attack if and when they acquire nuclear capability? That is a heated debate among defense experts. But what is almost never discussed is the threat of a naturally occurring EMP event.

I first learned about this possibility a few months ago at a conference organized by Empact America, a bipartisan, non-profit organization concerned exclusively with the EMP challenge. Scientists there explained “severe space weather” — in particular, storms on the surface of the sun that could trigger an EMP event.

The strongest solar storm on record is the Carrington Event of 1859, named after Richard Carrington, an astronomer who witnessed the super solar flare that set off the event as he was projecting an image of the sun onto a white screen. In those days, of course, there was nothing much to damage. A high-intensity burst of electromagnetic energy shot through telegraph lines, disrupting communications, shocking technicians, and setting their papers on fire. Northern Lights were visible as far south as Cuba and Hawaii. But otherwise life went on as normal.

The same would not be true were a solar storm of similar magnitude to erupt today. Instead, the infrastructure we depend on would be wiped out. Most of us would not adapt well to this sudden return to a pre-industrial age.

How likely is a repeat of the Carrington Event? Scientists say it is not only possible — it is inevitable. What they don’t know is when. The best estimates suggest that super solar storms occur once every 100 years — which means we are 50 years overdue.

Both the EMP Commission and a 2008 study by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) call for a response: hardening the electrical grid and other components of the infrastructure to increase the chances they would survive, as well as pre-positioning spares of essential, complex components of the electrical grid and other infrastructure critical to communications and emergency public services.

And it would certainly help if scientists could learn to forecast solar storms reliably. If we know one is coming, there are steps that can be taken to reduce the destruction. In particular, the electrical grid could be shut down; planes could be grounded (Air Force One is designed to withstand an EMP attack, but other planes would fall from the sky); citizens could be instructed not to leave home — in particular, to stay out of their cars, which would stop working — until the storm subsided.

President Obama has pledged $100 million to help Haiti recover from its recent earthquake. By coincidence, that’s precisely the amount that the NAS recommends be spent on measures that could limit by 60 to 70 percent the damage resulting from an EMP event. When you consider that such an event — whether naturally occurring or a “man-caused disaster” — could cause trillions of dollars in damage and claim more lives than were lost in World War II, that sounds like a reasonably priced investment.

Clifford D. May, a former New York Times foreign correspondent, is president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a policy institute focusing on terrorism and Islamism. 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; emp; iran; science; solarscience; sun; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: JasonC; neverdem

The military does harden their equipment though. American LRRP/LRS carrying very heavy, bulky radios envied the other NATO LRRPS like the Danes, with their light, little, unit created, or modified radios.

The explanation for our massive radios was that our policy was to prepare for EMPs, this was in the 1980s.


81 posted on 01/29/2010 10:09:14 AM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
The military consists of boy scouts who have a motto.

I meant to ask, what does that mean?

82 posted on 01/29/2010 10:12:27 AM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Simplistic fix: Build your garage into a FARADAY CAGE. Would probably work, too.
83 posted on 01/29/2010 12:25:04 PM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
"Build your garage into a FARADAY CAGE. Would probably work, too."

Provided the EMP hit while you were parked there and not at work, the grocery store, etc.

84 posted on 01/29/2010 12:31:43 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
The motto of the boy scouts is "be prepared". They don't care how likely something is, they will go out of their way to be prepared regardless. It could be a snowball's chance in hell - they will still prepare for it. It's a motto.
85 posted on 01/29/2010 2:30:18 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Got it, that makes sense.


86 posted on 01/29/2010 6:14:18 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
"Might have trouble storing their daily milk crop "

Cheese it!!

87 posted on 01/29/2010 7:06:00 PM PST by Dust in the Wind (U S Troops Rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard; sinanju; GraceG
GraceG had a good point.
The Amish ARE pacifists.
I take back what I said.
The Amish will be the entree on the menu.
88 posted on 02/02/2010 10:49:44 AM PST by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: trickyricky

>> GraceG had a good point.
The Amish ARE pacifists.
I take back what I said.
The Amish will be the entree on the menu. <<

No No No, We protect the Amish from the city Zombies and they teach us how to live like it is the 1800’s again. Maybe they can help us build a few barns as well.


89 posted on 02/02/2010 10:53:23 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
to destroy us completely; two or three nuclear weapons would send us back to the 1850s.

And being sent back to the 1850s would "destroy us completely" why?

90 posted on 02/02/2010 10:57:31 AM PST by Jim Noble (Hu's the communist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
And being sent back to the 1850s would "destroy us completely" why?

The infrastructure of 1850 could support the then population of approximately 23 million citizens. The destruction of much of our modern infrastructure would necessarily lead to great loss of life, mostly through starvation, until our population declined to the point where the surviving resources could support it.

In 1850, people grew their food and had food stored and on hand to keep them alive until the next harvest, and local communities grew around sources of food and water for basic sustenance. The life expectancy in 1850 was approximately 39 years, so the demands on food production were correspondingly fewer.

How will we feed the East Coast during the first winter without electricity and transportation? We won't.

91 posted on 02/02/2010 11:57:08 AM PST by TonyInOhio ( Who is Ellie Light?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
"No No No, We protect the Amish from the city Zombies"

I'm on-board.
But if I offer the Amish protection, and they rebuff me,
do I slap them around, or what?

Does this qualify as thread drift?

92 posted on 02/02/2010 10:02:01 PM PST by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson