Posted on 01/28/2010 11:19:29 AM PST by ConservativeMind
Just great. A “your guy is a bigger crook than my guy” pissing contest, LOL!
- Jp
You would think, but then you still get folks defending McCain here, or trying to take the focus off point, sorta like you have here. That's why some of us continue to try to out him during his attempt to return to the U.S. Senate.
<>John McCains Whimsical World of Conservatism
Food for thought for the George Soros, Teressa Heinz Kerry, Tides Foundation et al wing of the Republican Party.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2437888/posts?page=378#378
Mc Cain receives $112,000 from Keating and his minions.
And again, I made a simple suggestion. I expect liberals to fly out of their skin at the drop of a hat, theyre just so damned defensive. Im rather disheartened to see this sort of reaction from a fellow conservative.
I don't know about you, but I don't come here to criticize how other well meaning Conservatives post articles on the forum. This person posted the accurate publication date, and this particular article is timeless as it relates to McCain.
In my best Glenn Beck voice, I assure you that I will NEVER, EVER, EVER MENTION THAT AN ARTICLE IS AN OLD ONE AGAIN. ME BAD.
You can use Reagan's voice for all the credibility it will give you on this matter.
LOL!
ah com’on’ do we have to do this again. Next thing you’ll get people to start wanting to see Obama’s birth certificate.
In no way was I attempting to take focus off of McCain. If you knew me, you’d know how absurd that assumption is.
Here’s an old Alaskan chill pill for ya. It’s good medicine.
Unfortunately, you’ve got the description right. :-)
A couple forgotten quotes by SEn. John McCain:
Give everyone in the world an opportunity to come to America
Those who live closest are the ones who can get here. Everyone in the world should have the opportunity through an orderly process to come to this country.
Source: AZ Senate Debate, in Tucson Citizen Oct 16, 2004
Change rule barring immigrants from running for president?
Q: Should we change our Constitution to allow men like Mel Martinez, born in Cuba, and Arnold Schwarzenegger, born in Austria, to stand here some night as candidates for president?
McCAIN: He and I have many similar attributes, so I have to seriously consider it.
Source: 2007 GOP primary debate, at Reagan library, hosted by MSNBC May 3, 2007
http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/John_McCain_Immigration.htm
If you had a chill pill, why didn’t you take ‘the good medicine’ instead of criticizing someone who did nothing wrong?
As for taking the focus off McCain, intended or not, that’s what you did. And your dismissive attitude aside, you haven’t escaped being called on what you did, or the validity for it.
Lets see, McCain walks on and walks right off from a
situation that occured over 20 years ago when he got a clue.
JD Hayworth puts both feet into it with Ambramoff and Indian lobbying as late as a few years ago and just paying back the money which delayed his entering the Senate race.
Nice try by the article, but wishing won’t make it so.
My, my, what have we here.
McCains Law Preserved Loophole for Tribal Contributions
by Amanda B. Carpenter Human Events
01/30/2006
Sen. John McCain (R.-Ariz.), chairman of the Indian Affairs Committee, says the campaign finance reform law he sponsored in 2002 intentionally left open a loophole that allows Indian tribes to make campaign contributions to an unlimited number of candidates for federal office.
Before McCains law passed, most Americans were allowed to give an aggregate of only $25,000 to party committees and candidates for federal office in any two-year election cycle. Indian tribes were not subject to that cap. McCains law lifted the aggregate-contribution cap to $95,000 for ordinary American contributors, but declined to impose any cap at all on Indian tribes.
When I asked McCain last week why this was the case, he said, Because tribes are sovereign entities. They are treated on a government-to-government relationship, and were looking at that whole issue.
I asked, But it was an intentional thing? McCain replied, Oh yeah. Because they are sovereign nations unquote. We sign treaties with them.
When I pointed out that the U.S. does not allow contributions from foreign governments, McCain said, No, we dont. But theyre American citizens. So, its a unique kind of a status.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=11961
Its also quite interesting to note the BIG contributors to McCAin..the same ones Obama gets! Merrill Lynch $
Citigroup Inc
Morgan Stanley
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Goldman Sachs
And the top 5 industries...2nd is LAWYERS, last is conservatives
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00006424
LOL, you've got to be kidding! I've lived in Arizona all my life, I was here when it all took place, I work in construction and was VERY familiar with Charlie Keating and his lack of ethics. McCain spent a lot of time with Charlie, vacations, jaunts, etc. and old Charlies donated lots of money to McCain's campaigns. Don't kid your self about how "naive" he was. He knew what he was doing and it wasn't nice.
Still doesn’t make what JD did correct.
It is all moot anyways as JD doesn’t have a chance.
Are you done yet? If anyone has taken the focus off this thread it is you who is insisting on beating a dead horse. I made a suggestion, and not even in a rude tone. When someone says, “If I were you, I would have.....” and you take that as an insult or criticism, that indicates an extremely thin skin.
Now would you please, stop trying to make a mountain out of a molehill? Good day to you.
J.D. took and reported the funds. Explain to me what he did that was illegal or against House rules.
Failing that, I don’t see how your comment is connected to reality. “Still doesnt make what JD did correct.”
McCain took over $13,000 under the table and failed to report it in violation of House rules.
CaribouCrossing has little respect for those playing the victim card over something so incredibly insignificant and petty. You do realize that the U.S. is in danger from a far-left radical, don’t you? And your big concern right now is that someone made a suggestion about dates on an article.
I’m sorry, I’m sorry, I’m sorry. What more do you want? My moose meat?! ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.