Replies

I gotta say, I do not think Sarah came off well in her telephone call to Greta tonight. Greta kept asking Sarah if she could name a couple of moments that stood out in Brown's campaign, and Sarah fell back on the "Oh, I think the whole campaign was great", etc.

If she's going to be a Fox News analyst, she should bring something to the table other than generalities.

Me thinks/hopes you are only using heavy sarcasm, due to the fact that Sarah was attacked so outrageously after her Beck/ O`hole interviews.

I listened to the entire phone call with Gretta, and the only thing wrong was the phone connection. Sounded like she may have been on a cell phone, other than that she was right on the money!

To be fair, Sarah's line to Greta was crappy. It's her first actual live, breaking news opinion reporting. I think she was just jazzed at the win along with the rest of us. You want more considered opinion, give her a couple of hours.

And she was certainly right about this as being a step at taking our country back. Quite frankly, that's all I care about right now.

Nit picking. Everyone and their dog has already pointed out these “great moments’, seems a bit trivial to say it so late, and after he won. Besides the message was ‘good candidates’ that run grassroots campaigns can win. That is far more important a message for her as both an analyst and a politician.

I think it is Greta that was strange. It was like she couldn't get over feeling sorry for Coakley and wanted Sarah to give Coakley advise about what she should do to get over her loss. Sarah said that Coakley needed to let the Dems know that they are going in the wrong direction. It wasn't really the answer Greta was going for. It was like Greta wanted to get in a conversation with Sarah about how to emotionally council Coakley into how to handle her defeat and spring back from it. Sarah side stepped that weird scenario.

Sarah has to verbally walk over mine fields all of the time. She brushes over non essentials and zeros in on what is important. It all the nonessential talk that is probably dangerous. When you are being scrutinized as much as she, she cannot be too careful.

That being said she does need to work on being more specific in answering questions more often. I think she may not realize that she can take a second to think and then give an honest answer. Obama does the trick of stuttering like crazy to give himself time to think. He does it in a professorly sort of way that he uses to actually try to sound intellectual. Sarah needs to find a way to gracefully give herself a second to think before she answers so that she can give more in depth answers to more questions. It would also add a note of sincerity to her speech, honest pauses tend to do that. The problem with that, of course, is that the leftist media could try to spin any pause as being stupid. It is, of course, them that are stupid.

I don’t hear other major league political figures being asked these ridiculously specific questions. Just like everyone else, gov palin has daily business to attend to, and she isn’t paying any bills by reading fr and watching foxnews all day. People assume she’s a junkie following every punch, who is obama’s favorite founder anyway? FDR?