Just kidding, he never said that.
But he thought it 
Posted on 01/06/2010 9:51:25 PM PST by neverdem
Table-top experiments unlock quantum realm predicted by Dirac equation.
Trapped ions masquerading as high-speed particles have been used to confirm a bizarre 80-year-old prediction of quantum mechanics.
Quantum particles racing at close to the speed of light were first predicted to jitter violently as they moved — a phenomenon known as the Zitterbewegung — in 1930, by the father of quantum mechanics, Erwin Schrödinger. The prediction was based on the Dirac equation, developed by British physicist Paul Dirac in 1928, which merges quantum mechanics with special relativity to describe how particles such as electrons behave.
"The motion is particularly unexpected because there aren't any forces acting on the particle to make it quiver," says physicist Rene Gerritsma at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information in Innsbruck, Austria.
Instead, the jitter is caused by a combination of two effects. The first is the quantum property of superposition, which allows quantum objects to be in two mutually exclusive states or positions at the same time. The second is the existence of antimatter.
When a particle is in a superposition between its matter and antimatter states, these two contradictory sides of its personality should interfere, setting the particle quivering, explains Gerritsma. However, the phenomenon has never been observed experimentally because the motion is too small and too fast to detect in real quantum systems.
"For a long time, people have debated if Zitterbewegung is a real effect or something artificial that falls out of the equation that describes the situation, the Dirac equation," says Gerritsma, "and if it is real, whether it could ever be measured."...
(Excerpt) Read more at nature.com ...
Hmm, are they really testing the theory? Or are they simulating it?
/
IIRC, the results they got were in agreement with the Dirac equation.
In a way you could say they are "simulating" it, but only in the sense that they are using a different set up, but one which is described by the same equiations. The "solution" on that "analog" exhibits the real physical behavior of the original. So yes they are testing the theory. But not quite the original prediction.
Another way of looking at what they did is to look at their experimental set up as an analog computer which solves the same Dirac equation, suitably scaled I'm sure, as the original near light speed particle behavior. So the only question would be, does the Dirac equation properly describe the original situation.
Leptin-controlled gene can reverse diabetes
Biologist Develop New Microscope So Powerful It Will See Individual Molecules
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
But he thought it
“the father of quantum mechanics, Erwin Schrödinger.”
Not sure if I would call ole Erwin the “Father” of QM? :)
Tim-
I thought Schrödinger was famous for fathering a cat.
No, he’s the infamous Cat Killer!
Yes, but it’snot “really” dead ya know.. :)
Tim-
Well, I'm suspicious of things necessarily working the same on such different scales. I mean F = ma doesn't even hold together when you approach the speed of light.
What he really said was "God doesn't play dice with the universe".
To which Stephen Hawking replied, many years later, "Not only does God play dice, he sometimes throws them where we can't see them".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.