Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Avatarocious (Another spectacle hits an iceberg and sinks. )
The Weekly Standard ^ | 28 Dec 2009 | John Podhoretz

Posted on 12/21/2009 1:27:57 PM PST by AreaMan

Avatarocious
Another spectacle hits an iceberg and sinks.


by John Podhoretz
12/28/2009, Volume 015, Issue 15


Avatar
Directed by James Cameron

Avatar, we are told, does things with cameras and computers and actors that have never been done before. Its painstaking combination of real-life action and animation has, we are told, taken cinema to a new level. It cost anywhere from $328 million to $500 million, we are told, and took four years to make. It is a breakthrough, we are told, the boldest step into the future of filmmaking, an unparalleled achievement.

What they didn't tell us is that Avatar is blitheringly stupid; indeed, it's among the dumbest movies I've ever seen. Avatar is an undigested mass of clichés nearly three hours in length taken directly from the revisionist westerns of the 1960s-the ones in which the Indians became the good guys and the Americans the bad guys. Only here the West is a planet called Pandora, the time is the 22nd century rather than the 19th, and the Indians have blue skin and tails, and are 10 feet tall.

An American soldier named Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) is sent to make friends with the blue people. To effect this, scientists download his consciousness into a 10-foot-tall blue body. Jake discovers that the natives are wonderful in every possible way. They are so green it's too bad their skin has to be blue. They're hunters and they kill animals, but after they do so, they cry and say it's sad. Which only demonstrates their superiority. Plus they have (I'm not kidding) fiber-optic cables coming out of their patooties that allow them to plug into animals and control them. Now, that just seems wrong-I mean, why should they get to control the pterodactyls? Why don't the pterodactyls control them? This kind of biped-centrism is just another form of imperialist racism, in my opinion.

Like the Keebler elves, the Blue People all live in a big tree together and they go to church at another big tree, under which (we learn) lives Mother Earth, only since it isn't earth, she isn't called Mother Earth, but the Great Mother or something like that. Meanwhile, back among the humans at their base camp, there's a big fight. The scruffy scientists, led by Sigourney Weaver, want to learn, learn, learn about the wonders of the planet and the people and Mother Earth and the big tree and the pterodactyls. But the scientists work for an evil corporation (natch) and the evil corporation is only there because it wants-you can write the rest; but I will, just for the sake of expedience-to exploit the planet's natural resources. In particular, it wants to exploit a mineral called (again no kidding) unobtainium. And it turns out there's a big deposit of unobtainium under the Keebler Elf Tree. They want the elves to move.

Getting them to move is Jake Sully's job. And he does earn their trust, even though the leader of their tribe says, "His alien scent offends my nose!" (The line is translated from their nonexistent language with subtitles that are designed to look like the men's room signs at an Indian casino.) The Blue People, in particular the contemptuous and lovely Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), show him their wondrous ways. But before he can discuss hiring Allied Van Lines with them, the Evil Corporation intervenes.

It is run by an evil Yuppie, and the Yuppie's security is provided by an evil Marine. And for no good reason other than to get the movie into its second act, they decide to stage a military attack on the Elf Tree, thus blowing the zillions of dollars they sank into the project of making Jake Sully into a Blue Person rather than waiting a couple of weeks.

Oy, the suffering that ensues, all for some lousy unobtainium! Oy, the destruction! You can hear writer-director James Cameron weeping over his special-effects computer as the bad humans he created commit this terrible atrocity against the Blue People who don't exist. As for me, I was reminded of Oscar Wilde's immortal crack about Charles Dickens's tears as he killed off the child heroine of his Old Curiosity Shop: "It would take a heart of stone to read the death of Little Nell without laughing."

The only salvation for Pandora lies with our man Jake Sully turning into the leader of the blue-skinned people, rallying them to the cause of protecting their planet against the Evil Corporation. This, too, is unacceptably paternalistic, in my view; after all, why should giant blue people have to learn these things from a shrimpy white guy who doesn't even have a tail or built-in Skype?

Eventually, it falls to Jake to plug his fiber-optic cables into a plant and ask the Great Mother to do something. And she does. She rallies the pterodactyls, not to mention some rhinoceroses and dogs, to join with an army of blue people to take down the EC. In the end, it's Jake Sully vs. the Evil Marine, who is dressed up to look like (again, not kidding) a Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robot, one of those ludicrous toys from the late 1960s that gave toys a bad name.

You're going to hear a lot over the next couple of weeks about the movie's politics-about how it's a Green epic about despoiling the environment, and an attack on the war in Iraq, and so on. The conclusion does ask the audience to root for the defeat of American soldiers at the hands of an insurgency. So it is a deep expression of anti-Americanism-kind of.

The thing is, one would be giving James Cameron too much credit to take Avatar-with its mindless worship of a nature-loving tribe and the tribe's adorable pagan rituals, its hatred of the military and American institutions, and the notion that to be human is just way uncool-at all seriously as a political document. It's more interesting as an example of how deeply rooted these standard-issue counterculture clichés in Hollywood have become by now. Cameron has simply used these familiar bromides as shorthand to give his special-effects spectacular some resonance. He wrote it this way not to be controversial, but quite the opposite: He was making something he thought would be most pleasing to the greatest number of people.

Will it be? Aside from the anti-American, anti-human politics, the movie is nearly three hours long, and it doesn't have a single joke in it. There is no question that Avatar is an astonishing piece of work. It is, for about two-thirds of its running time, an animated picture that looks like it's not an animated picture.

On the other hand, who cares? It doesn't count for much that the technical skill on display makes it easier to suspend disbelief and make you think you're watching something take place on a distant planet. Getting audiences to suspend disbelief isn't the hard part; we suspend disbelief all the time. It's how we can see any movie about anything and get involved in the story. The real question is this: If Avatar were drawn like a regular cartoon, or had been made on soundstages with sets and the like, would it be interesting? Would it hold our attention? The answer is, unquestionably no. There's no chance anybody would even have put it into production, no matter that Cameron made the box-office bonanza Titanic. So the question is: Does the technical mastery on display in Avatar outweigh the unbelievably banal and idiotic plot, the excruciating dialogue, the utter lack of any quality resembling a sense of humor? And will all these qualities silence the discomfort coming from that significant segment of the American population that, we know from the box-office receipts for Iraq war movies this decade, doesn't like it when an American soldier is the bad guy?

John Podhoretz, editor of Commentary,is THE WEEKLY STANDARD's movie critic.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: avatar; culture; hollywood; moviereview; movies; philosophy; podhoretz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: AreaMan
I’m not the one with the tin hat.
61 posted on 12/21/2009 2:29:15 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Naspino

‘unobtainium’ - Was that really in the movie? Sounds like a Jay Ward concoction for a Rocky and Bullwinkle story line. (Remember the upsidaisium plot?)


62 posted on 12/21/2009 2:30:30 PM PST by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Heh, that is a great quote!


63 posted on 12/21/2009 2:31:07 PM PST by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
What they didn't tell us is that Avatar is blitheringly stupid; indeed, it's among the dumbest movies I've ever seen. Avatar is an undigested mass of clichés nearly three hours in length taken directly from the revisionist westerns of the 1960s-the ones in which the Indians became the good guys and the Americans the bad guys. Only here the West is a planet called Pandora, the time is the 22nd century rather than the 19th, and the Indians have blue skin and tails, and are 10 feet tall.

I'm amazed to see someone supposedly as smart as John Podhoretz write something so stupid. The only thing he got right (and that unwittingly) was that "the Indians" had blue skin. Does he know why they have blue skin? Does he know the relationship between the blue skin and the name of the movie? Does he know the literary background of the blue-skinned beings riding giant flying creatures?
64 posted on 12/21/2009 2:33:42 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“Why do you guys sit on your hats?” “Un-ass that shi*. It’s only a flare.” My all-time favorite flick.


65 posted on 12/21/2009 2:37:54 PM PST by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
Avatar was B-O-R-I-N-G and juvenile.

Can't believe the number of adults raving over such a piece of schlok.

66 posted on 12/21/2009 2:46:24 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
$77 million for the opening weekend, and that was probably down a bit because of the weather. Not record setting, but pretty certainly well enough to make a good profit. Ugh.

$77M is not good for a film that needs to make back $300M+ in production costs. The latest Transformers movie made $200M in it's first long weekend (It started on a Wednesday, made $91M thru Thurs, then another $109M on the regular weekend).

Movies generally make about half of all the gate-money they will ever make in the first two weeks of release, and only half the gate goes to the studio in the first two weeks, decreasing thereafter.

It will probably break even with foreign sales plus DVD, but the first weekend turnout will probably seem disappointing to the studio.

67 posted on 12/21/2009 2:47:31 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Does he know why they have blue skin? Does he know the relationship between the blue skin and the name of the movie?

Do you mean this guy/chick/whatchamacallit?


68 posted on 12/21/2009 2:47:33 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Can't believe the number of adults raving over such a piece of schlok.

True

Well, this is America and at least we are free to make, mass market and profit from schlock.

We're also free to call it schlock and freely talk about the idiotic ideas contained therein.

69 posted on 12/21/2009 2:50:30 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
They should have cited the Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London and invoked eminent domain.

Yes, we could have Al Gore selling unobtainium futures at $Trillions of personal profit and bribing fellow Dems to invoke eminent domain. Then the closing shows the big government sending men with guns to take away their home tree and imprisoning or killing those who resist big government.

70 posted on 12/21/2009 2:54:21 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
No I have nothing but for contempt for anyone that is a thought policemen. Your thoughts are toward the book burning and censorship side.

"You see these dictators on their pedestals, surrounded by the bayonets of their soldiers and the truncheons... They are afraid of words and thoughts! Words spoken abroad, thoughts stirring at home, all the more powerful because they are forbidden....

A swing and a miss.

oh please...nobody said that this movie should be banned but in a FREE SOCIETY you can call out well made but idiotic art for what it is, pretty and well made yet IDIOTIC and SIMPLE MINDED.

That's all, nobody is calling for a book burning so stop making s*it up.

71 posted on 12/21/2009 3:02:58 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

My wife and I went to see Beowolf and about 10 minutes into it I asked her if she thought the focus on the film was off a bit - I said it seemed almost animiated

She looked at me like I lost my mind

——Dear. That’s because it is-——

Boy I felt dumb


72 posted on 12/21/2009 3:08:39 PM PST by Popman (Election 2010: Congress: your pink slips are coming ............... :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
When I read, a book I have the ability to separate fact from fiction.

I, don't get it.

73 posted on 12/21/2009 3:09:29 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan; org.whodat

Dude, don’t you know that criticism equals censorship? That by taking offense to the ubiquitous Leftist propaganda permeating pop culture you are oppressing the sacred muse of the artiste?

Bumpkin! Rube! Philistine!


74 posted on 12/21/2009 3:17:38 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

I saw it. The black football player is named Michael Oher. Most of his black friends from the project are portrayed as thugs and criminals. His mother is portrayed as a crack head. When Michael begins to succeed, his black friends ridicule him and try to drag him back down again. The black community is portrayed as being far more responsible for his problems than white racism although that is portrayed as well.

The white family finds him walking down the street in the rain and let him come over to sleep on the sofa. They leave him alone downstairs while they go upstairs to their own bedrooms. In the morning, before going downstairs, the husband and wife joke to each other about calling the insurance adjuster.

Besides that, it’s got FOOTBALL.


75 posted on 12/21/2009 3:26:29 PM PST by Locomotive Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
Our 20 year old son has decided that his movie is a big ticket remake of Ferngully.
76 posted on 12/21/2009 3:27:33 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
I realize the error of my naive ways...how could I have doubted the all knowing and all seeing sacred muse of the artiste?

foolish me.

77 posted on 12/21/2009 3:29:22 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

unobtainium is a joke I first heard as an engineering undegrad in the 70s. “Here’s something we could build but first we’ll need to get some unobtainium”. It’s engineering shorthand for a project you could do if only you had a material that was light enough, strong enough, or whatever physical property that’s keeping you from doing what you want to do.


78 posted on 12/21/2009 3:29:53 PM PST by Locomotive Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Gran Torino is a wonderful movie about redemption. I put it in the same category at Denzel's Man on Fire.

Clint Eastwood was just delightful in his relationship with the Hmong family next door, and it was poignant that he got along better with them than with his own sons.

79 posted on 12/21/2009 3:31:57 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke
My sister saw The Blind Side, and just LOVED it, and she's about as far from a lib as you can get! It's based on a true story. Some white family in Texas DID take in a young black man who was homeless, and apparently, family-less, and treated him like one of their own. It sounds like a wonderful Christian witness to me, though I don't know if religion is mentioned at all.
80 posted on 12/21/2009 3:38:34 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson