Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Avatarocious (Another spectacle hits an iceberg and sinks. )
The Weekly Standard ^ | 28 Dec 2009 | John Podhoretz

Posted on 12/21/2009 1:27:57 PM PST by AreaMan

Avatarocious
Another spectacle hits an iceberg and sinks.


by John Podhoretz
12/28/2009, Volume 015, Issue 15


Avatar
Directed by James Cameron

Avatar, we are told, does things with cameras and computers and actors that have never been done before. Its painstaking combination of real-life action and animation has, we are told, taken cinema to a new level. It cost anywhere from $328 million to $500 million, we are told, and took four years to make. It is a breakthrough, we are told, the boldest step into the future of filmmaking, an unparalleled achievement.

What they didn't tell us is that Avatar is blitheringly stupid; indeed, it's among the dumbest movies I've ever seen. Avatar is an undigested mass of clichés nearly three hours in length taken directly from the revisionist westerns of the 1960s-the ones in which the Indians became the good guys and the Americans the bad guys. Only here the West is a planet called Pandora, the time is the 22nd century rather than the 19th, and the Indians have blue skin and tails, and are 10 feet tall.

An American soldier named Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) is sent to make friends with the blue people. To effect this, scientists download his consciousness into a 10-foot-tall blue body. Jake discovers that the natives are wonderful in every possible way. They are so green it's too bad their skin has to be blue. They're hunters and they kill animals, but after they do so, they cry and say it's sad. Which only demonstrates their superiority. Plus they have (I'm not kidding) fiber-optic cables coming out of their patooties that allow them to plug into animals and control them. Now, that just seems wrong-I mean, why should they get to control the pterodactyls? Why don't the pterodactyls control them? This kind of biped-centrism is just another form of imperialist racism, in my opinion.

Like the Keebler elves, the Blue People all live in a big tree together and they go to church at another big tree, under which (we learn) lives Mother Earth, only since it isn't earth, she isn't called Mother Earth, but the Great Mother or something like that. Meanwhile, back among the humans at their base camp, there's a big fight. The scruffy scientists, led by Sigourney Weaver, want to learn, learn, learn about the wonders of the planet and the people and Mother Earth and the big tree and the pterodactyls. But the scientists work for an evil corporation (natch) and the evil corporation is only there because it wants-you can write the rest; but I will, just for the sake of expedience-to exploit the planet's natural resources. In particular, it wants to exploit a mineral called (again no kidding) unobtainium. And it turns out there's a big deposit of unobtainium under the Keebler Elf Tree. They want the elves to move.

Getting them to move is Jake Sully's job. And he does earn their trust, even though the leader of their tribe says, "His alien scent offends my nose!" (The line is translated from their nonexistent language with subtitles that are designed to look like the men's room signs at an Indian casino.) The Blue People, in particular the contemptuous and lovely Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), show him their wondrous ways. But before he can discuss hiring Allied Van Lines with them, the Evil Corporation intervenes.

It is run by an evil Yuppie, and the Yuppie's security is provided by an evil Marine. And for no good reason other than to get the movie into its second act, they decide to stage a military attack on the Elf Tree, thus blowing the zillions of dollars they sank into the project of making Jake Sully into a Blue Person rather than waiting a couple of weeks.

Oy, the suffering that ensues, all for some lousy unobtainium! Oy, the destruction! You can hear writer-director James Cameron weeping over his special-effects computer as the bad humans he created commit this terrible atrocity against the Blue People who don't exist. As for me, I was reminded of Oscar Wilde's immortal crack about Charles Dickens's tears as he killed off the child heroine of his Old Curiosity Shop: "It would take a heart of stone to read the death of Little Nell without laughing."

The only salvation for Pandora lies with our man Jake Sully turning into the leader of the blue-skinned people, rallying them to the cause of protecting their planet against the Evil Corporation. This, too, is unacceptably paternalistic, in my view; after all, why should giant blue people have to learn these things from a shrimpy white guy who doesn't even have a tail or built-in Skype?

Eventually, it falls to Jake to plug his fiber-optic cables into a plant and ask the Great Mother to do something. And she does. She rallies the pterodactyls, not to mention some rhinoceroses and dogs, to join with an army of blue people to take down the EC. In the end, it's Jake Sully vs. the Evil Marine, who is dressed up to look like (again, not kidding) a Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robot, one of those ludicrous toys from the late 1960s that gave toys a bad name.

You're going to hear a lot over the next couple of weeks about the movie's politics-about how it's a Green epic about despoiling the environment, and an attack on the war in Iraq, and so on. The conclusion does ask the audience to root for the defeat of American soldiers at the hands of an insurgency. So it is a deep expression of anti-Americanism-kind of.

The thing is, one would be giving James Cameron too much credit to take Avatar-with its mindless worship of a nature-loving tribe and the tribe's adorable pagan rituals, its hatred of the military and American institutions, and the notion that to be human is just way uncool-at all seriously as a political document. It's more interesting as an example of how deeply rooted these standard-issue counterculture clichés in Hollywood have become by now. Cameron has simply used these familiar bromides as shorthand to give his special-effects spectacular some resonance. He wrote it this way not to be controversial, but quite the opposite: He was making something he thought would be most pleasing to the greatest number of people.

Will it be? Aside from the anti-American, anti-human politics, the movie is nearly three hours long, and it doesn't have a single joke in it. There is no question that Avatar is an astonishing piece of work. It is, for about two-thirds of its running time, an animated picture that looks like it's not an animated picture.

On the other hand, who cares? It doesn't count for much that the technical skill on display makes it easier to suspend disbelief and make you think you're watching something take place on a distant planet. Getting audiences to suspend disbelief isn't the hard part; we suspend disbelief all the time. It's how we can see any movie about anything and get involved in the story. The real question is this: If Avatar were drawn like a regular cartoon, or had been made on soundstages with sets and the like, would it be interesting? Would it hold our attention? The answer is, unquestionably no. There's no chance anybody would even have put it into production, no matter that Cameron made the box-office bonanza Titanic. So the question is: Does the technical mastery on display in Avatar outweigh the unbelievably banal and idiotic plot, the excruciating dialogue, the utter lack of any quality resembling a sense of humor? And will all these qualities silence the discomfort coming from that significant segment of the American population that, we know from the box-office receipts for Iraq war movies this decade, doesn't like it when an American soldier is the bad guy?

John Podhoretz, editor of Commentary,is THE WEEKLY STANDARD's movie critic.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: avatar; culture; hollywood; moviereview; movies; philosophy; podhoretz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: brownsfan

My wife got pissed at me after we saw dances with wolves because I said at the end of it that if I were a soldier I would hunt that bastard to the ends of the earth and string him up at the first available tree for helping the Indians kill the troopers at the end. But hey, that’s just me. ;^)


41 posted on 12/21/2009 2:06:52 PM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
Great. Dances with Smurfs plus a pc message.

Think I'll skip this one................

42 posted on 12/21/2009 2:06:52 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

I won’t see this movie, at least I won’t pay to see it — but ‘unobtainium’? Seriously? I despise that all video games are made for the 9-13 year old intellect and that just simply wreaks of hollywood talking down to us stupid people — trying to edumucate us on that thar kommunism thingy majig.


43 posted on 12/21/2009 2:10:20 PM PST by Naspino (Not creative enough to have a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
Its painstaking combination of real-life action and animation

"Beowolf" was all that and cool!

44 posted on 12/21/2009 2:11:51 PM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
John Podhoretz is my favorite movie reviewer. Had a great movie and dinner date with mrs. jimfree several years ago on his recommendation of the Irish flick Once.
45 posted on 12/21/2009 2:13:28 PM PST by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
LOL, aways has, and always will, that is why they call it fiction.

Your comments and responses seem to be brief, cryptic and bereft of any kind of meaning.

To which I respond:

"There was once a man called Rousseau who wrote a book containing nothing but ideas. The second edition was bound in the skins of those who laughed at the first."
Thomas Carlyle

46 posted on 12/21/2009 2:13:31 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
It's funny that you use the Apocalypse Now example, because when it was made it was panned as an overbudget spinoff of someone else's story Heart of Darkness.

I haven't seen Avatar yet but I'll probably see it once just to check out the visual effects. The big question will be whether people want to see it again and again, and how it plays on DVD.

47 posted on 12/21/2009 2:14:53 PM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Dont forget the 1911.


48 posted on 12/21/2009 2:16:20 PM PST by 03A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kaboom

Avatar sounds truly billous.


49 posted on 12/21/2009 2:16:44 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The CRU needs adult supervision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

It was ok, 162 minutes of cliche though. I just have this feeling that the Weelky Standard - DailyKos Alliance versus the evil isolationist tea party yahoos might not last too long after reading Poddies review.


50 posted on 12/21/2009 2:19:52 PM PST by junta (S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
No I have nothing but for contempt for anyone that is a thought policemen. Your thoughts are toward the book burning and censorship side.

"You see these dictators on their pedestals, surrounded by the bayonets of their soldiers and the truncheons of their police. Yet in their hearts there is unspoken - unspeakable! - fear. They are afraid of words and thoughts! Words spoken abroad, thoughts stirring at home, all the more powerful because they are forbidden. These terrify them. A little mouse - a little tiny mouse! - of thought appears in the room, and even the mightiest potentates are thrown into panic."

Winston Churchill

51 posted on 12/21/2009 2:22:12 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty

My wife wants to see “The Blind Side”, but I heard that it is basically a story of a poor black, underpriveleged boy being helped by a typical rich, white family, out of a sense of ‘white guilt’ and the black boy faces discrimination from all the other whites, but the white mother just complains that everyone should show tolerance, again showing white racism against blacks.

Is any of this true?

I am so tired of every black person being shown as a victim and every white person shown as the racist oppressor. On the other hand, my wife has heard that it is a movie with a conservative Christian theme. What is your take on the movie?


52 posted on 12/21/2009 2:22:37 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Took my 11-year-old son to the 3D version at the IMAX (best part was the new memory foam seats!) I was a bit worried about the anti-miltary, enviro-kookiness basis of the film having a negative effect on him. When we were leaving, he just said “I loved those machine-guns!”

HAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHA!!!


53 posted on 12/21/2009 2:23:04 PM PST by mdk1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
That’s correct actually. But what do you think one should do in response? Not read Shakespeare because you aren’t a Monarchist and so forth?

I assume your hyperbolic comparison of Shakespeare to this steaming pile was just to make a point.

So, from my comment that is all you were able to discern?

All I said is don't ignore that all art pushes a world view.

but...

If Shakespeare were alive and well and was using his royalties to finance a philosophy that hated America, the military, capitalism etc...then no, I wouldn't PURCHASE any Shakespeare and put money in the pocket of that monarchist skidmark.

54 posted on 12/21/2009 2:23:05 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan

Sometimes a movie IS just a movie.

I saw the 3D version of “Avatar” on Friday night and loved it. Once you get past the obnoxious 3D goggles (I wear glasses), the movie is beautiful. It’s detailed and I kept wanting to see more plants and animals, especially the “DaVince Bug” as my son described it.

At the risk of defending a bland plot...a thicker one would’ve weighed down the movie. There was so much to see on a second-to-second basis that one more involved would’ve bogged it down. Cameron needed a villian so he fell back on the good ol’ “corporate military” standby, but the reasoning was so thin I forgot about it and just thoroughly enjoyed the visuals. I had no problem with 10’ blue aliens (but my favorite characters are Kermit the frog, Pilot from Farscape...) and watching them move was amazing.

Please don’t let politics keep you home. This is a must-see on the big screen, and as a loyal conservative I thoroughly enjoyed it.


55 posted on 12/21/2009 2:24:14 PM PST by Kieri (The Conservatrarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

The only war flick worse than Apocalypse Now was the Deerhunter.


56 posted on 12/21/2009 2:24:17 PM PST by 03A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mdk1960
Awesome....Kid's got his priorities right.

Maybe he'll grow up to design some of those.

57 posted on 12/21/2009 2:24:27 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
When my grandson is twenty no one will be watching Avatar and Apocalypse Now will still be compelling.

I remember someone say the same thing about that silly film "Star Wars".

58 posted on 12/21/2009 2:24:37 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Dude...you have to either cut down or double up on whatever medication it is you are currently on.

Lighten up Francis.

59 posted on 12/21/2009 2:25:42 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 03A3

Ya gotta admit...with that 1911 he sure looked the part. Great role!


60 posted on 12/21/2009 2:28:26 PM PST by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson