Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate health Care Debate - Live Thread
C-Span ^ | 12/19/09 | US Senate

Posted on 12/19/2009 4:34:45 AM PST by BCrago66

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-442 next last
To: onyx

FOX news just announced that Nelson had announced he would vote FOR!


81 posted on 12/19/2009 6:19:44 AM PST by TexasRedeye (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/19/AR2009121900797.html?hpid=topnews

Sen. Ben Nelson to announce support for health-care bill

...

Asked if he was prepared to support the bill, Nelson said, “Yeah.”


82 posted on 12/19/2009 6:21:59 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye
It's all a dog and pony show. This demon is going to pass.

All our emails and phone calls didn't amount to anything.

So they should just vote NOW and get the inevitable damn thing over with.

sw

83 posted on 12/19/2009 6:22:22 AM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

ooops, sorry, i see that you are gettting some redundancy in opinions. i’m a little behind.

gonna go out and play in the snow while i still am not taxed for that.

b back later


84 posted on 12/19/2009 6:22:31 AM PST by incredulous joe (Bacon makes everything better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: teg_76

You’re so right about that. I’ve asked for only one item for Christmas. I’ll let you guess what it is, but I fully expect Santa to deliver. I saw the twinkle in his eye while I was seated on his lap. *wink*

Senator DeMint told O’Reilly last night that what the democrats are doing is as close to tryanny as he’s ever seen and I agree with him.


85 posted on 12/19/2009 6:23:03 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Here’s some of Manager’s Amendment language, which I got off a lefty blog:

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/12/19/8498/7361

“‘‘(3) Notwithstanding subsection (b) and paragraphs 5 (1) and (2) of this subsection, the Federal medical assistance percentage otherwise determined under subsection 7(b) with respect to all or any portion of a fiscal year that begins on or after January 1, 2017, for the State of Nebraska, with respect to amounts expended for newly eligible individuals described in subclause (VIII) of section 11 1902(a)(10)(A)(i), shall be determined as provided for under subsection (y)(1)(A) (notwithstanding the period provided for in such paragraph).”

The essence of it is that that Nebraska - and apparently only Nebraska - will now get greater Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement from the federal government. That’s the great principle that Ben Nelson held out for.


86 posted on 12/19/2009 6:23:13 AM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: maggief

God help us.


87 posted on 12/19/2009 6:23:30 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
...and apparently only Nebraska - will now get greater Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement from the federal government

That is also what bought the "Louisiana Purchase" from Landrieu.

88 posted on 12/19/2009 6:25:53 AM PST by TexasRedeye (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Holy cow.


89 posted on 12/19/2009 6:26:57 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I am reading the managers amendment
at c-span.org/healthcare.

I think Nelson only got a state opt-out provision
for abortion in the exchange.
If anyone else can figure out the abortion language that Nelson
settled for, please advise.

What about us taxpayers in other states who are not going to pay
any taxes for abortion. I am going to be a conscientious objector.
I am going to write a letter in my IRS return next year.
For religious reasons moral reasons I cannot pay $100 which would
go toward funding the subsidies under the HCR.


90 posted on 12/19/2009 6:27:18 AM PST by preamble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather; TexasRedeye

So much for Ben Nelson and his solemn promise to the unborn.

He’s been had. Kathleen Sebelius is in charge of the decision making. Her office is mentioned countless times in the legislation. Let us never forget that she was Tiller the baby killer’s enabler and supporter.


91 posted on 12/19/2009 6:27:27 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

bookmark


92 posted on 12/19/2009 6:27:55 AM PST by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: onyx

another question, don’t the Dems only have 59 votes or did I miss an appointment from Massachusetts to fill Kennedy’s seat?


93 posted on 12/19/2009 6:28:45 AM PST by j.argese
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
That and the reinstatement of the current abortion funding ban. Both of those Nelson asked for as the price for his vote.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

94 posted on 12/19/2009 6:29:11 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: spectre
All our emails and phone calls didn't amount to anything.

This is not true and you can rest assured that the war is not over even with the passage of the bill. And the bill has NOT passed yet.

The left has done itself tremendous damage with the American people and American's don't like having things shoved down their throats.

It may be in place for a few years - and it won't even take effect for a few years - but it can be taken apart piece by piece and scuttled with a new congress and a new POTUS and increased pressure from more and more dissatisfied Americans.

Patience and faith, FRiend. :0)

95 posted on 12/19/2009 6:30:37 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: preamble
States can opt out of paying of abortion where state laws prohibit such funding. States like California and New York, where court orders require such funding, there will be no opt out.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

96 posted on 12/19/2009 6:31:25 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66; maggief; SE Mom; TexasRedeye

You know, when I saw the Nebraska Governor talk with Greta the other night, he mentioned the burden on Nebraska, but to his credit, he included the burden on ALL states, and I knew right then and there that Reid would get Ben on board ala a Mary Landreui Louisiana purchase.

Damn them all. They’re all for sale at the right price and it’s OUR money.


97 posted on 12/19/2009 6:32:34 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I’ll wait for others to find the pertinent language and do the analysis, but so far I haven’t heard that the Senate bill will have an outright ban on federal abortion funding like Stupak Amendment in the House.


98 posted on 12/19/2009 6:33:07 AM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe; j.argese

The United States Constitution does not provide for nor authorize the recall of United States officers such as Senators, Representatives, or the President or Vice President, and thus no Member of Congress has ever been recalled in the history of the United States.


99 posted on 12/19/2009 6:33:30 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

OMG- that is unbelievable.

Corrupt sons of bitch’s- every last one of them


100 posted on 12/19/2009 6:33:30 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-442 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson