Posted on 11/26/2009 9:55:25 PM PST by Jim Robinson
I said I would didn't I?
A newbie troll. That’s what I figured as well.
Sold! LOL
This guy needs to be jettisoned into the ranks of the government unemployed. Unfortunately he’ll get a pension for his treachery.
See, that's the way I see it, too. It's so easy to get holier than thou on these threads but when the rubber meets the road and practical decisions must be made, it's not so easy, is it?
I remember it well. I had to have a very tough conversation with myself but knew it was for the good of my country to do everything within my power to stop Harkin.
I pretty much have read the whole thing. And again, I don’t see JR dictating what can or can’t be said here. Nor has the admin/mod weighed in. Just you. I’m betting that they’re getting pretty tired of the bickering though.
Can we drop it?
Have you not read what I wrote?
I said I would have voted for the conservative candidate (even if they were a third party candidate) or written in a name.
Ah you reference Kosovo which is mostly forgotten today in the US.
Helping create a Muslim state in Eastern Europe. What a brilliant idea.
Can we drop it?
You post. I answer. Your choice.
Wagglebee: Either you try to stop Harkin, or you don’t—there is no middle ground. You’re trying to have it both ways and you can’t. First you say wouldn’t try to stop him, then you say you would and now you say you won’t. You sound like John Kerry.
Agreed. Dumbest move ever.
He answered. You are being disingenuous again.
Yes, you stop him by voting for a CONSERVATIVE.
First you say wouldn’t try to stop him,
That is a LIE!
then you say you would and now you say you won’t.
No, that would be a problem with your reading comprehension.
You sound like John Kerry.
No, YOU sound like a RINO apologist.
Since you're here, who would you have voted for in this instance? Harkin or Ganske?
I've asked repeatedly and no one wants to answer.
Dang! Well, he must be laying low since I haven’t seen him since he got zapped.
I've asked repeatedly and no one wants to answer.
I've answered REPEATEDLY!
She doesn’t read posts, she just repeats the same schtick over and over. I think her behavior is outright trolling, no different than Cedric.
Oh I don’t support disruptors (trolls) at all. But you have to understand... I spent years in the belly of the beast (Slate’s Fray) being attacked by, and fighting/fencing with, some of the most rabid, foaming at the mouth leftists on the planet.
As a result, what I consider to be trollish disruption is apparently a lot more intense or offensive than what you consider it to be.
And again (sigh)...I don’t bother to even read the posts by someone that might be trying to disrupt a thread. It’s not like a “have-to” on my list of priorities. Only if I’m bored enough....hehe. The lefties at Slate always whined (to the admins) about anyone that didn’t agree in lock-step with them. And they even HAD an ignore button. Let’s not do anything that even remotely makes us appear similar to them. They are, after all, such babies.
And you are back to playing this game that you played when you first came on this thread. Wagglebee answered you. You just don't like the answer. Enough!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.