Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred to Newt: We're not 'deaf, dumb'
Politico ^

Posted on 10/27/2009 4:45:19 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Fred to Newt: We're not 'deaf, dumb' By: Andy Barr October 27, 2009 07:20 PM EST

Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson brushed back former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Tuesday over Gingrich’s warning that the Republican Party is wrong to thrown in its lot with the Conservative Party nominee Doug Hoffman over Dede Scozzafava, the GOP’s candidate, in the special election in New York’s 23rd congressional district.

Gingrich has called the many prominent national Republicans – including Thompson – who have endorsed Hoffman over Scozzafava in recent days “misguided,” arguing they are making a “mistake” to back a third-party candidate over the party’s nominee.

The conservatives who back Hoffman point to Scozzafava’s support for abortion right and ties to local union leaders.

During his radio show Tuesday, Thompson said he was “sad” to hear “when a good Republican friend of mine says that I, and the other good, conservative Republicans who have endorsed Hoffman, are ‘misguided.’ And that’d be my friend, Newt Gingrich.”

“I respect Newt. He’s a friend. Done a lot of good, I think. But he endorsed Scozzafava early on. So, we have an honest disagreement in the family,” Thompson said.

But, he added, “Newt said that our support for Hoffman was a ‘purge,’ was ‘misguided,’ was—we were applying a litmus test that said if you’re not 100 percent with us than you're not with us at all. And that Scozzafava was more in step with her district and therefore we shouldn't substitute our judgment for the party elders of the district.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; hoffman; ny2009; ny23; scozzafava; thompson; whigpartyii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: goodnesswins
As horrifying as that being a photo-op is, what is truly terrifying is that it is a SCREENSHOT from THIS VIDEO that gives credence to the global warming scam!
41 posted on 10/27/2009 5:49:32 PM PDT by Don W (I will praise Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
Its an interesting aspect to the NY race that is has become a litmus test for who in the Republican party is in fact what a Republican should be: a Conservative.

Romney: on the fence, RINO
Huckster: same as above
Fred: solid C
Sarah: solid C
Newt: RINO
- and so on.
Anyone know if Jim Demint has endorsed Hoffman? I recently started following Demint after his excellent Honduras article in the WJS.

42 posted on 10/27/2009 5:50:46 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What kills me are the RINOs that say, “Well, if you vote for a Conservative, a Democrat will win cuz YOU split the vote.”

“American to RINOs: Conservatives voted for McCain thanks to Palin and nearly won it. ‘Moderates’ and RINOs split THEIR vote and voted for OBAMA!”


43 posted on 10/27/2009 5:53:18 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

My thoughts on the flag you posted. It needs a “BIG” cannon round through the Blue & White area.

Possibly from a pocket nuke.

There is only one type of “good” Commie.


44 posted on 10/27/2009 5:55:27 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Fred T withdrawing from the race was a great disappointment.


45 posted on 10/27/2009 5:56:00 PM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonrush23

Want to go Rino and Dem hunting? Here is where to start looking:

“Congressional Voting Score Card”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2341921/posts

Those in both Parties who have yellow highlighting are the enemy combatants.


46 posted on 10/27/2009 6:01:46 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

SURRENDER MONKEYS ON PARADE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aQM-5u9CkE


47 posted on 10/27/2009 6:02:44 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (THE 2010 ELECTIONS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT IN OUR LIFETIMES! BE THERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timydnuc; All

Rush is correct.

When I go into the voting booth, I first look at the Conservative Line on the ballot. Then I check the Republican line.

If the same candidate is on both lines for a particular office, I pull the Republican lever down, if it is different, I pull the Conservative lever to vote against the Republican candidate, and for the Conservative candidate.

I am registered as a Republican, but actually consider myself an Independent Conservative. If I were to register as the latter, I wouldn’t be able to vote in the primaries, unfortunately.


48 posted on 10/27/2009 6:05:02 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Gingrich has lost any credibility he had.....

And Fred has done...?

There was no bigger Fred fan than me. But you can't throw the hip of claining to run and then pull it back in. Any reason we should listen to this guy? He could have won.

49 posted on 10/27/2009 6:11:20 PM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The really strange thing here, and the article itself or others may have mentioned it, is that Newt actually picked the day that a poll was released that shows more people described themselves as Conservative, than by an other description. 40% of them picked Conservative, vs 20% picking liberal.

Still Newt claims that Conservatives are wrong to think they should lead the Republican Party.

Newt, bud, get a grip. If our party leaders, you included, would spend 1/10th as much time pushing Conservative ideals explaining them to the public, that you do backing liberal policies, that 40% would be 55%.

Get off your ass and help the rest of us retake this nation.


50 posted on 10/27/2009 6:12:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Palin/Thompson...Thompson/Palin...Sarah/Fred...Fred/Sarah.

Anyway you slice it, those 2 should make up the ticket in 2012.


51 posted on 10/27/2009 6:15:08 PM PDT by jsdjason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

Do these politicians think that voters are going to punish them for backing a third party candidate? If so, they are wildly out of touch.


52 posted on 10/27/2009 6:19:46 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jsdjason

Palin/Thompson...Thompson/Palin...Sarah/Fred...Fred/Sarah.

Anyway you slice it, those 2 should make up the ticket in 2012.


They WERE to win last year until SOMEBODY in the RNC decided the Soros and commie-backed 0 was fated to win instead.

SOMEBODY got skeered by the Daley machine and put McLettuce up instead: who was it? Who decided that 0 was destiny?


53 posted on 10/27/2009 6:26:50 PM PDT by txhurl (It's only a matter of time before FreeRepublic has this fraud's scalp on our lodge pole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Fred should be our President. Just damn.


54 posted on 10/27/2009 6:30:38 PM PDT by RockinRight (Shove it down our throats in 2009, and we'll shove it up your a$$ in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

It’s too bad Fred ain’t about 10 years younger. If he were he could position himself perfectly for 2012...but I think he’s just not in the mood to campaign anymore (Not sure I can blame him) and that’s why he was so hesitant in ‘08.


55 posted on 10/27/2009 6:33:17 PM PDT by RockinRight (Shove it down our throats in 2009, and we'll shove it up your a$$ in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

If FDT had acted this forceful when he was running in 2007, he might have gotten somewhere.


56 posted on 10/27/2009 6:37:05 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
What good does one vote for a Republican Speaker of the House do when all of her other votes, votes that affect US every day, are with the Rats?

It's very simple. The Party in charge sets the agenda.

The Party in charge controls the legislation that is introduced on the floor.

The Party in charge makes sure that legislation that tramples on your freedom never sees the light of day.

Unless it's the 'crats that are the Party in charge.

57 posted on 10/27/2009 6:37:37 PM PDT by metalurgist (Want your country back? It'll take guns and rope. Marxists won't go without a fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
"Any reason we should listen to this guy?"


Uh, perhaps because he is right and what he is saying makes sense. If he says something that I do not think makes sense, then I do not listen to him. It is simple as that. His current argument on a subject should be judged objectively on its own merit, not on how one feels about past decisions he has made.
58 posted on 10/27/2009 6:44:49 PM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Then she is COMPLETELY worthless to the GOP.


59 posted on 10/27/2009 7:04:01 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well Newt, you lost any support from me. Can’t wait for the next time that one of your telemarketers calls and wants a donation for your PAC. They will get an earful!!!


60 posted on 10/27/2009 7:10:28 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson