Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
(View past Libertarian pings here)
"FCC's Diversity Czar: Mark Lloyd: 'White People' Need to be Forced to 'Step Down' 'So Someone Else Can Have Power'
America is under siege. Every assumption, every basic fundamental right is under attack. The very premise of America, individual rights, is being destroyed. You won't like what comes after America.
Net neutrality is part of the larger shift to "change" America from our founding principles of unalienable property rights, a free market system and a constitutional republic, toward Marxism.
Please send this article to your list so they are informed and can attack with knowledge.....America is being OVERTHROWN.
and the hits just keep a comin
I thought real Net Neutrality was "bits are bits," that is you can charge me for bandwidth but not discriminate on the source of the bits.
I guess an example would be a Cable provider slowing down traffic from sites that let you see their programs online without using their DVR service.
Maybe the objection is to the hijacking of Net Neutrality for their own lefty agenda and if that's the case then yes I am opposed.
Is it true that the Christian Coalition is supporting Net Neutrality??? If so why????
“…to ensure a "free" and "open" Internet…”
To ensure freedom we will oppress the beliefs and actions of those we disagree!
…those that do not know history are willing to accept another nice sounding story, as they wonder down that road to hell paved with good intentions.
A chicken in every pot and the internet in every household. All paid for by the taxpayer and run by gubment!
Three things:
One, without Stallman, there would be no GNU/Linux.
Two, individual property rights are a good thing, but unlimited copyrights and patents (de jure monopolies) are not so good. That's why they are supposed to be limited to only certain types of information and granted for only certain periods of time.
Three, "net neutrality" is simply a maintenance of the present situation with regards to the Internet's architecture, that is, transit providers agree to pass each other's network traffic without preference or prejudice. Right now, folks running servers pay bandwidth charges, and so do individuals and businesses that access those servers. Without net neutrality, many ISPs have figured that they can introduce what is effectively variable-rate tolling on their networks as a means of extracting additional revenue from either server operators or end users. There is absolutely nothing wrong with "net neutrality" on principle; and yes, Obama's implementation of "net neutrality" could be full of Marxist booby traps.
I can think of nothing that will lose BHO more of his own base than restricted, government controlled internet access.
I can think of nothing that will inflame BHO’s opposition more than attempting to gag communications.
Sow the wind geniuses, sow the wind.
Is there a place to find these rules? I remember reading the 6 principles the rules were to be based on. I realize that the implementation could twist things, but I’m not sure why I should be imposed to rules that set out to achieve this:
1) Consumers are entitled to access whatever lawful internet content they want.
2) Consumers are entitled to run whatever applications and services they want, subject to the needs of law enforcement.
3) Consumers can connect to networks whatever legal devices they want, so long as they do not harm them.
4) Consumers are entitled to competition between networks, applications, services and content providers.
5) Service providers are not allowed to discriminate between applications, services and content outside of reasonable network management.
6) Service providers must be transparent about the network management practices they use.
“A specter is haunting Europe – the specter of Communism….” So began the Communist Manifesto so many years ago. A manifesto driven by the darkest side of human nature, expressed in an unappeasable appetite to control mankind.
That same specter is now haunting the White House.
The same ideas that have animated the 20th century’s mass murderers now have a happy home in the White House. Say that again: The same ideas that have animated the 20th century’s mass murderers now have a happy home in the White House.
Prove me wrong. You can't.
Obama is merely another worshipper at the altar of statism, sharing the same pew as Stalin, Castro, Mao, Chavez and Pol Pot. They bow before the same god of human sacrifice and power for power’s sake. And as the sad, bloody history of the twentieth century, and as the first decade of the 21st has shown, demons dance on their empty altars.
These monsters would rather rule in hell as barbarians sitting on top of a stinking heap of rubble and corpses than leave the rest of us alone to live in peace. I believe that enough patriots still remain to prevent this from happening. But it will come at a terrible cost.
Titus Livy, in his introduction to his monumental history of Rome remarked that his purpose in writing was "to trace the progress of our moral decline, to watch, first, the sinking of the foundations of morality as the old teaching was allowed to lapse, then the rapidly increasing disintegration, then the final collapse of the whole edifice, and the dark dawning of our modern day when we can neither endure our vices nor face the remedies needed to cure them."
Now we must face the remedies needed to cure ourselves of the Marxist totalitarian rot that has overtaken us. That we have allowed to overtake us. Livy's cure will not take place in the voting both nor will it come from the forums of public debate.
Those forums have been lost to us, as any observant individual well knows.
The honest answers to the following questions won’t be pleasant to contemplate.
When your opponents lack the price of admission to civilized debate: a respect for reason, belief in objective truth, and a willingness to admit they’re wrong when the facts prove it so - what then?
When your opponents' goals are to destroy the very foundation of your culture and your society - and to offer nothing in return but the howling nightmare of a society of cannibals and looters - what then?
When your opponents use the public education system to indoctrinate your children's' minds in the politics of victimization and the nobility of human servitude and sacrifice - what then?
When the institutions of higher learning are occupied by Marxist multiculturalists who despise the very philosophical foundation upon which the architecture of liberty and human dignity have been constructed and seek to destroy it - what then?
We know the answer - as historian Samuel P. Huntington said in his Clash of Civilizations, "History shows that no country so constituted can long endure as a coherent society."
And now we must pay the price for Livy’s cure. You all know that there is only one way this can end.
I'm assuming the FCC hasn't changed the definition, though.
have fun. Hope you don’t mind drinking Coffee with aspartame and cream.
What you don’t drink coffee?
Sounds like a personal problem.
Next!.... calling number 46th million in line. Have a seat, you can get on the internet in an hour.
It is all getting past the point of return. I guess there is no tipping point until all is lost.
I am sick of it.
BTTT!
how hard’s it gonna be to duplicate the net? it can’t be captured.
Why doesn’t he move back to Keyna? He has NO RIGHT to change America into a socialist/communist crap hole. That boy is going to push too far and he’s going to meet America’s finest patriots, and I can promise you they won’t be there to share a beer with him!