Posted on 10/19/2009 8:32:17 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Newsweek magazine recently published a commentary by atheist Richard Dawkins containing some of his arguments against creationists. Therein he admitted, What would be evidence against evolution, and very strong evidence at that, would be the discovery of even a single fossil in the wrong geological stratum.[1]
Out of place fossils are actually common, despite Dawkins claims regarding the massive numbers of fossils documenting evolutionary history. ICR News has reported on several over the last 12 months [2,3,4,5,6] and another one has surfaced recently...
(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...
And why WOULD Jesus use “ that after 20 billion years that the Creator used evolution...” in discussing marriage of all things????
If there’s some point you’re trying to get to, please do so as my time is limited at the moment.
Hmmm...How about “Organization of Exporting Countries”, OEC. Your turn if you are going to answer questions with questions. Just go ahead with your explanation.
That means alot coming from an evo-atheist who pretends to be a Christian while denouncing genuine Christians in the name of Christianity. I have asked you numerous times if you accept Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, and you have refused to answer each time. All Christians confess Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Let me know if you ever become an actual Christian (or are at least willing to be honest and admit that you are an evo-atheist disruptor posing as a Christian). Until then, buzz-off imposter.
As for New Scientist, as per usual your darwiniac allies are trying to have it both ways. On the one hand, darwood’s so-called “tree of life” is the MAIN PREDICTION of his evo-religious creation myth, on the other hand, the evos have been forced to admit that Charlie’s MAIN PREDICTION has now been falsified. So what do your fellow Temple of Darwin fanatics do? They try to have it both ways of course, declaring darwood’s main prediction to be FALSIFIED, while at the same time declaring that this FACT should not tarnish their cult leader’s image in the least. What a bunch of buffoons!
The 'in the beginning' part. Not after 20 billion years, which would be 'almost at the end', not 'in the beginning'.
"And why WOULD Jesus use that after 20 billion years that the Creator used evolution... in discussing marriage of all things????"
Jesus said he was the Truth. Why WOULDN'T he say "after 20 billion years that the Creator used evolution" if that is the truth? No matter what he was discussing? Are you saying we can't count on Jesus to speak the truth unless he is speaking directly about the subject? For that matter, how do you know that he WASN'T discussing BOTH the creation timeline AND marriage when he said this? Aren't you just assuming that you can ignore it?
"If theres some point youre trying to get to, please do so as my time is limited at the moment."
I'm wondering if there is some point you're trying to get to? After saying, "I'll be right here and happy to deal with your present questions." you now say that your 'time is limited'. It appears that you are just trying to run away as fast as possible.
You call me an imposter, yet you are a demonstrable FRAUD. You are no Christian, and I challenge your professed acceptance of Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. Your statements in that regard are phony and self-serving. You are a side show huckster.
You have a point, get to it please as I’m going to be away for a few hours. But I’ll take up the discussion when I return if you care to.
Does this mean GGG has officially declared himself the arbiter of all things “genuine” and the destroyer of all things “not”??
Megalomania is kind of an ugly thing, generally.
That means alot coming from an evo-atheist who pretends to be a Christian while denouncing genuine Christians in the name of Christianity. I have asked you numerous times if you accept Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, and you have refused to answer each time. All Christians confess Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Let me know if you ever become an actual Christian (or are at least willing to be honest and admit that you are an evo-atheist disruptor posing as a Christian). Until then, buzz-off imposter.
Furthermore, your continue to betray your complete lack of knowledge about any matter in science. Without reference to the specific topic in the article, falsification is actually a GOOD thing that advances scientific thought and achievement. Lack of a falsification mechanism locks creation “science” in a 6000 year old bubble of compounded rationalization.
If you think that OEC means Organization of Exporting Countries", then I would be interested in how you relate that to your statements here, ""It doesn't apply just to YEC folk. Jesus said God's word was truth (John 17:17) and as we gain epignosis we see the pattern of Biblical teachings as Paul called it (2 Tim. 1:13) so if Jesus uttered those words I'd recognize the truth of them, the pattern."
"Your turn if you are going to answer questions with questions. Just go ahead with your explanation."
I'm thinking that someone who uses the acronym YEC knows full well what OEC means and is only trying to avoid the point.
I think it just means that he’s a lying fraud who knows that, despite the truth, his sleight of hand will continue to amaze and “educate” his minions (few though they be) of faith as weak as his own. In that regard, they’re like democrat voting blocs.
To me, he’s just entertainment.
Having said that, let me introduce you to someone who will listen to your phony diatribes to your rotten heart's content:
I have already made it multiple times.
"So how do you get around the timeline in Gen 1 and Ex 20 and Christ's statement in Matt 19 using Scripture only?"
"Jesus said he was the Truth. Why WOULDN'T he say "after 20 billion years that the Creator used evolution" if that is the truth? No matter what he was discussing? Are you saying we can't count on Jesus to speak the truth unless he is speaking directly about the subject? For that matter, how do you know that he WASN'T discussing BOTH the creation timeline AND marriage when he said this? Aren't you just assuming that you can ignore it?"
"The 'in the beginning' part. Not after 20 billion years, which would be 'almost at the end', not 'in the beginning'."
You pretending not to understand the point shows that you can't defend your position.
You’re exposed, you know it, and you’re running for the hills. No childish graphics can overcome the shame of your actions. You are over.
That means alot coming from an evo-atheist who pretends to be a Christian while denouncing genuine Christians in the name of Christianity. I have asked you numerous times if you accept Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, and you have refused to answer each time. All Christians confess Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Let me know if you ever become an actual Christian (or are at least willing to be honest and admit that you are an evo-atheist disruptor posing as a Christian). Until then, buzz-off imposter.
Also, please refer back to the graphic in my last reply to your phony self.
Why all the hate in your heart for people who disagree with you?
That is definitely not a Christian trait.
Please figure out where all this hate is coming from.
Keep digging. It entertains me.
I don’t hate them. I am merely exposing a wolf in sheep’s clothing who poses as a Christian in order to attack Christianity from within. This person has been given dozens of opportunities to declare Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior, and he has refused each time. He also like to pretend he is Catholic from time to time, in an effort to drive a wedge between Catholics and Protestants. But when pressed, we also learn that he is not Catholic. When someone is a known liar, you don’t waste time debating them, you expose them for what they are.
See my last reply to you.
Actually, I’ll do better than that. I will refer all readers to this morning’s exchange in its entirety, not just to your last post. Your sophistry will be evident to everyone. Your evasion upon exposure will be the subject of laughter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.