Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.
-snip-
Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court. Payment shall be made to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of today’s Order. If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings.
(Full Order at the link.)
Well I do have to come to the defense of BuckeyeTexan's honor here as he has admitted that Obama is not a natural born citizen in his opinion as posted below:
Yes, correct. Obama is not a natural born citizen for that very reason, IMO. However, the courts are not the proper venue. I believe that the only option via the courts is a quo warranto action in D.C. Outside of that, impeachment is the only legal method to remove him. If we buckle down and focus on taking back the House AND Senate in 2010, we might get somewhere. 79 posted on Tuesday, October 13, 2009 9:37:51 AM by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
Perhaps those on his list will follow his example.
Funny thing, I don’t remember seeing so many stridently helpless people until Katrina.
I live back in the San Francisco Bay Area and always my back pack in the trunk.
Many think it weird or that I am survivalist. I am neither. I have live through floods and mudslides in the Santa Cruz Mountains.
I have lived through floods, Tornadoes and hail storms in Oklahoma.
More over I have found myself in the position of helping people and been fortunate to have my gear with me.
I tell better to be prepared and have it, than need it and not.
The only people who don’t think I am weird are the ones who I have helped and I have had to bail myself out a few times.
Yeah, that quick internet search brings up fake Kenyan birth certificates.
Good line!
Nope. Even if that is true (why would it cost so much money to protect things that aren't public records in the first place? Dunno) but even if it is, he'd be foolish to release a birth certificate now.
First of all, people would just claim it's a fraud anyway... and second... when he's got his opponents looking foolish with all their wailing and gnashing of teeth his best play is to let them keep doing it.
Doesn't look like mine, either. But I wasn't born in Hawaii.
There is speculation that he was adopted at the age of 7. If so, his BC or COLB should have a notation saying amended, as does mine and my brother and sister.
Only if it was done in a U.S. court. Why would Soetoro, an Indonesian national and temporary resident, adopt a child in a U.S. court?
I remember going to college and having to provide a BC along with school records.
And how do you know Obama didn't have to do the same?
Based on my experience why wouldn't I question Barry and his forthrightness.
And you are free to do so. But what says Obama has to satisfy your doubts in order to be president?
Too bad they didn't toss the one that cut the water off to about 40% of California food production.
I saw a complete loss of compression as the gut rained out of the can.
Guilty! lol
Don’t forget the DOJ is paying folks to spread disinformation on the Internet regarding pending cases. Some of the folks posting pro-usurper comments to FR could actually be paid by DOJ disinfo operations.
~~~
The organized Obots .. SEIU, other unions, ACORN, various pacs, Soros groups, Obamians and convinced believers, etc. etc. are certainly known for these tactics .. and they’re known for doing it on conservative fora.
It’s not out of the realm of possibility.
And it’s certainly nothing I would discount.
Sorry — I meant to ping you to #561
That and he showed it twice. So he must have been proud to hit it.
And how did the original founders say we should verify natural-born citizen status?
The quickest Internet check is seeing Obama’s fake Hawaiian COLB.
On the contrary, it's the only explanation for the actions and comments of you and most of the other Birthers around here.
Please be specific. What law was violated by a failure to properly vet?
This is the point. There is no law saying he has to produce a birth certificate. Without such a law on the books, you can't go back and make someone answer for not doing it. You have to change the law for the future.
Well that is the question isn’t it? What is the requirement of proof and all we have his word and 50 SOS’s who did not vet him at all.
I don’t have that answer of requirement.
As far as Barry providing the long form BC for college and first passport I have said he had to and why didn’t he present that one instead of one that would undoubtedly raise questions.
And only two of those documents might have any bearing on his Constitutional qualifications for the presidency. He’s submitted one, and the fact that you call it a forgery is irrelevant. Others say it’s genuine.
The law violated was that he did not show his qualifications. The constitution requires the candidates to be qualified. THAT’S WHAT LAW. The sec of state of cal is required to qualify candidates for the state primary. She failed to do so. THAT’S WHAT LAW! She also took an oath to uphold the state and federal constitutions. THAT’S WHAT LAWS. OOPS, OATH OF OFFICE.
First time he ever hit anything with a handgun!
Who says it’s genuine? The marxists at Factcheck don’t get to vet the candidates now, do they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.