Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty
I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.
Nope. Isn't that good enough?
See what I’ve said, they jump in everywhere to to distract and challenge your very sentence, that is what they are paid for by DoJ (Aporn) as the usurper’s brown shirts!!!
You asked me the same question.
I answered it, and showed you in the constitution exactly where it specifies that the office requires that the candidate be a “Natural Born” citizen, and why.
What is gained by asking different people the same question?
You know the answer...time to move on, unless that is all you have, which is pathetic.
I am referring to 870!!!
Just show us the documents.
Amen! Our alleged president is concealing something. That’s what we’re left with after all of the cute legal conversations have been had.
Already repeatedly addressed.
de ju·re (d jr, d yr)
adv. & adj.
According to law; by right.
According to law, he does not qualify, and by right, he has no standing. Therefore De jure, is not something he is qualified as, IF, he is found to be ineligible...
We will see.
The Treason was committed buy those that allowed Obama to run for an office he was not eligible for in the first place.
Yes, but then the COLB would not list Hawaii as the place of birth. Furthermore, that was only possible after 1982. Obama's birth was registered with the state in 1961.
or unattended, or on the basis of very slender testimony after the fact?
As in any state, you can get a standard, long-form birth certificate (not just a COLB) for your child in Hawaii if he was born at home without a doctor or midwife. The documentation standards in these circumstances are no more lax than in any other state.
However, it takes longer time to register a home birth. Since Obama's birth was registered only 4 days after his birth, it's pretty unikely to have been a home birth.
(This is assuming that the Obama COLB is in fact genuine, which we dont really know.)
The relevant facts contained therein have been verified by state officials. I'm not sure what else you want.
Already repeatedly addressed.
Documents you can’t even prove exist.
Yet you can't answer what it is that makes the COLB insufficient to prove his eligility other than the fact that you say it isn't. Well Obama says it is. What makes you right and him wrong?
That "document" does not show that both his parents were US citizens at the time of his birth. That document is not reliable without witness and hospital information that can be independently verified. Better evidence is readily available. That document contradicts Indonesian records showing he was a citizen of Indonesia with the name of Barry Soetoro.
Someone had the title to the Brooklyn Bridge, and was selling it, is it necessary to verify their claim and documents? Barack Obama is a proven chronic liar, and anything he presents must be taken in that light and verified or else we may end up with a President like the bridge, worthless. We need to have trust and confidence in our President and we do not have that. Now we have no confidence in Congress or our court system to do their jobs. Confidence must be restored.
If that’s all true than there is no reason not to show the American people the long form birth certificate, and to let us know who delivered him and where.
After all, we might want to erect a monument or something.
Article III, Section 3: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Care to explain how?
I know.
I guess you missed post #929, so I’ll repeat it:
To: Non-Sequitur
Heres a pretty good summary:
http://instruct.westvalley.edu/hannigan/eligibility%20summary.pdf
HI statue 338-17.8 states:
(a) [§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory
or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.
HTM
The Certification of Live Birth (COLB) could be issued to
a) people without documented proof of birth in Hawaii whose birth had not been previously registered in Hawaii, and
b) that this document could be amended by foreign citizens (a person born in a foreign country).
http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/hawnbirth.html
Unlike other states, Hawaiis COLB does not prove that a citizen was actually born in Hawaii if the citizen COLB was issued between the years of 1911 1972. The long form needs to be provided to prove natural born citizenship. The long form provides the name of the hospital, doctors name and signature, registrar signature, Parents signature etc. Additionally, Box 7e, of the long form, states Country and State or Foreign Country. It is the contents of this box that will confirm the Presidents country or origin and thus status of edibility.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=101483
Again, I'm not the one claiming to be qualified to be President of the United States. The burden of proof is on the applicant, not the employer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.