Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty
I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.
This is good news. Let’s get this issue settled.
Uh, no. Why would it? That's a pretty silly assertion.
Seriously, what’s the scholarship program for foreign students? What advantage would there have been in applying for admission or for assistance as an Indonesian national rather than a black American?
Actually, those are the birthers. They're the ones making silly arguments, like arguing about the difference between "date filed" and "date received".
What you've been hearing from us critics is pretty standard stuff. No convolutions involved. You just don't want to hear it.
According to the IRS, there is no statutory authority for special agents to carry firearms. The General Counsel, Department of the Treasury, has concluded that no specific authority is necessary where a federal officer has the authority to make an arrest and that the authority to carry a firearm is implicit.
http://www.gao.gov/archive/1996/gg96154.pdf IMPLIED LAW
Eligibility is in the Constitution, Enforcement of that requirement is IMPLIED is noting else, and WE the People are ultimately responsible for the Constitution.
I read the thread of replies by you and OldSwabby, and still contend that in matters of national security, not judicial misconduct, that appointments, signed documents,etc will have to be reversed, as it adversely affects our military, economy, security, etc.
That is my personal opinion, I don’t really know, and when it comes to a person being a usurper to the highest office in the land, it is uncharted territory. I just want our nation whole again.
Show me where I’ve been “uncivil” on this thread.
If any one of my posts qualifies for that in your mind, you’re way too sensitive for Free Republic.
Considering the important facts you and your cadre studiously ignore, that is downright hilarous.
You bet.
OK, what does it take to enforce it? What is Obama required to do to prove his qualifications?
OK—So it’s not true that a COLB could be obtained in Hawaii for someone whose birth was actually out-of-state or unattended, or on the basis of very slender testimony after the fact? (This is assuming that the Obama COLB is in fact genuine, which we don’t really know.)
He has to prove he is a natural born citizen, 35 years of age and 14 years a resident of the US.
Prove to whom? And with what supporting evidence?
Uh since I am talking to you I better clarify that and state Natural Born Citizen of the United States....
Hopefully he’ll have to prove it in a court of law.
Tell us about the travel ban to Pakistan again.
He did that. He showed a COLB from the state of Hawaii and he's lived in the U.S. for more than the last 14 years. Now what?
Well he is here 24/7 and he will dispute every words you post just for the heck of it and he will jump in on other postings to see if they will bite on his calculated baits, can you say obamagasm!!!
Are you joking?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.