I guess you missed post #929, so I’ll repeat it:
To: Non-Sequitur
Here’s a pretty good summary:
http://instruct.westvalley.edu/hannigan/eligibility%20summary.pdf
HI statue 338-17.8 states:
(a) [§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory
or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.
HTM
The Certification of Live Birth (COLB) could be issued to
a) people without documented proof of birth in Hawaii “whose birth had not been previously registered in Hawaii,” and
b) that this document could be amended by foreign citizens (“a person born in a foreign country”).
http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/hawnbirth.html
Unlike other states, Hawaii’s COLB does not prove that a citizen was actually born in Hawaii if the citizen COLB was issued between the years of 1911 – 1972. The long form needs to be provided to prove natural born citizenship. The long form provides the name of the hospital, doctor’s name and signature, registrar signature, Parent’s signature etc. Additionally, Box 7e, of the long form, states “Country and State or Foreign Country.” It is the contents of this box that will confirm the President’s country or origin and thus status of edibility.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=101483
No, I read it. So what, Obama still says it proves he's a natural-born citizen. What says that it isn't enough proof? Other than you?
Do you believe that the Hawaii newspapers reported Obama’s birth based on Hawaii Bureau Statistics? Or do you believe that the announcements were never made but later inserted — or that both papers were lying about the information coming from the Bureau?