Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty
I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.
Once again you’re left off the Troll list. What are you doing wrong?
Great troll sign you got there! Also, I read all the posts you pinged to me about Orly’s case in front of Carter and they were enlightening. Thanks.
Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.
She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obamas inelgibility!
She states the case expertly, including the bc and natural born citizen aspect, when not abused by the U.S. state-controlled media.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880
HELP HER!
PayPal:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
If you sue the president then you sue the United States.
My point was merely about the mechanism for filling Urkle’s place not the viability or longevity of a Biden presidency. You are undoubtably correct about the view people would have of him, those that care at all.
This is an honest question, and I’m not claiming to know ANYTHING about legal matters, so please don’t be condescending. I think what most people are wondering is why the judge would make the trial dates “final”, instead of leaving them “tentative”, if he is still undecided on the motion to dismiss. Perhaps you can explain the legal reason for this entry into the record in a way that will answer this question for people.
That’s not true. The EO he signed was referring to Presidential records only, not personal records of Presidents.
After they finish rolling on the floor, I wish they'd post it. I suspect Orly won't. :-)
Please. She’s nut job. Don’t give her your money.
****NOTE TO ALL:
If I go to
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=4727
using Explorer, it’s fine.
It freaks on Firefox.
Yay!!!! Fireworks!!!! Snoopy dance!!!
Go back to the muzzie...and don’t forget your kneepads.
COURT ORDER FINALIZES SCHEDULE FOR TRIAL!
by John Charlton
(Oct. 7, 2009) Today was published the Court order resulting from the Oct. 5th hearing in Barnett vs. Obama, issued by federal judge, David O. Carter, in the Southern Division of California.
The order, reads as follows:
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final.
Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
October 7, 2009 4:49 PM
Also, see Post 295
"On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final. Case Management dates are as follows: Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009 Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009 Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. 3 : 21 01 Initials of Preparer kh Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 81 Filed 10/05/2009 Page 1 of 1"
A fool and his money are soon parted. I read that somewhere.
“NUTS’.
Mr. West already made a reply to Dr. Taitz. His reply was one word...”Nuts”.
Which was the reply General Anthony Clement McAuliffe made to the Germans when they surrounded him and demanded his surrender.
“From: Charles Lincoln [mailto:charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:11 AM
To: Dejute, David (USACAC); West, Roger (USACAC)
Subject: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.
Dear Messers DeJute & West:
Dr. Taitz has asked me to ask you whether you are willing to stipulate that, now that the Scheduling Order has been made final, rather than moot, that it is now time for us to begin discovery. We need to start sending out notices of deposition duces tecum to parties and subpoenas duces tecum to non-parties. The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.
Charles E. Lincoln, Research Associate & Law Clerk for Dr. Taitz, Esq., Attorney for the Plaintiffs.
Deo Vindice
May the Lord God be with you,
and with thy spirit!
My assistant, Mr. Lincoln has contacted Roger West, assistant US attorney, lead attorney representing the defendants, asking to stipulate to discovery in light of todays order by Judge Carter. You can see his polite and constructive response Nuts. I wonder, if I wasnt a woman, if I was a part of good old boys club, would there be a more appropriate response.”
I wonder how this fraud can stand himself....you’d think he’d be living in fear of being found out....him, his wife and the people who engineered this heist.
Let the tomato-hurling begin!
Yeah, and I was, too!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.