Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rolling_stone; Candor7; LucyT

COURT ORDER FINALIZES SCHEDULE FOR TRIAL!
by John Charlton

(Oct. 7, 2009) — Today was published the Court order resulting from the Oct. 5th hearing in Barnett vs. Obama, issued by federal judge, David O. Carter, in the Southern Division of California.

The order, reads as follows:

On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final.

Case Management dates are as follows:

Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing — December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment — November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment — November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment — November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference — January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial — January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.

October 7, 2009 4:49 PM


313 posted on 10/07/2009 2:05:00 PM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]


To: MestaMachine; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; GOPJ; ..
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

. . . Update at #313.

336 posted on 10/07/2009 2:22:24 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine

This is good news, but I’ve become so pessimistic that I see five opportunities to be shot down. :o(


368 posted on 10/07/2009 2:47:29 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine; LucyT
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing — December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.

Now that is an interesting date to begin with!

391 posted on 10/07/2009 3:06:56 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine; stockpirate; MrLuigi; rxsid; pissant; LucyT; Red Steel; David; BP2; patriot08; ...

What’s up with the “Motion for Summary Judgment”? Filed by the government defendants? If so, what’s their strategy, other than delay? Seems as if their motion for dismissal has been denied, and, since summary judgment requires even a stricter standard on the part of the defense than dismissal does, the defendants - absent additional evidence on their behalf - have no case for summary judgment.


432 posted on 10/07/2009 3:45:01 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson