Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty
I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.
No, I read it. So what, Obama still says it proves he's a natural-born citizen. What says that it isn't enough proof? Other than you?
“See what I’ve said, they jump in everywhere to to distract and challenge your very sentence, that is what they are paid for by DoJ (Aporn) as the usurper’s brown shirts!!!”
We know what they are doing. Last time we caught one of their criminals in action, the same avoidance tatics were used. They are avoiding: Obama has to qualify for President just like any American has to qualify for a passport. It’s like pretending the issuing is lying about sex, versus the real issue of commiting perjury.
“The relevant facts contained therein have been verified by state officials. I’m not sure what else you want.”
The statement by the Hawaii official was vague and carefully lawyered, and not a specific affirmation of the statements on the alleged COLB. The state has not affirmed that this alleged COLB was issued by them.
“What you’ve been hearing from us critics is pretty standard stuff.”
Exactly.
So what? Obama says it's proof enough to establish natural-born citizenship. What says he's wrong other than you?
I can think of a very good reason: it is unnecessary, and it's a hastle to get a long form, as pissant has verified.
Furthermore, by not showing one, he encourages crackpot conspiracy theories, which I imagine he finds amusing. I know I would if I were in his shoes.
and to let us know who delivered him and where.
And how exactly is that relevant to his eligibility to be president?
Your whole position is “he says so.” Wow.
Fundamentally, your argument is exactly the same as his taxpayer-funded lawyers: “We won. There’s nothing you can do about it. Get over it.”
In other words, your attitude is also identical to Obama’s.
Well you are right on, Bubba! Why would a Black US citizen apply for an affirmative action scholarship as an Indonesian unless he was not a Black American? Things that make normal people go hummm. Things that make after-birthers go “yikes!”
And your whole position is "I say so." Double wow. What does the law say, that is the question.
Well, to be exact, if he was not born in the United States of America, under the laws of this country in 1961, his mother could not transmit citizenship to him.
This is what she said:
"Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii"
How is that vague? Where's the lawyering?
The state has not affirmed that this alleged COLB was issued by them.
So? They have affirmed he was born in Hawaii. That's sufficient to affirm his eligibility to be president.
Do you believe that the Hawaii newspapers reported Obama’s birth based on Hawaii Bureau Statistics? Or do you believe that the announcements were never made but later inserted — or that both papers were lying about the information coming from the Bureau?
Neither the identity of the physician who delivered him, nor the hopsital in which he was born is necessary to confirm he was born in the USA.
Well, gosh. Why don't we post it again:
"No person except a natural born Citizen...shall be eligible to the Office of President...."
Donchaknow, it is uncivil to disagree with an after-birther. Right there, you are a racist and hater.! Geez, don’t you “stupid” people know anything? /s/
The hospital is a physical location. One has not been provided for the man known as Barack Obama. At least not one inside the United States.
And here we are back at the beginning, having come full circle once again for the umpteenth time.
If you want to argue that some authority should have been more diligent, I won't disagree. I know of no law prohibiting the Federal Election Commission asking for qualification documents from candidates, for example.
But I also know of no law requiring them to do that. So maybe we can say it's something that makes sense to do and they have the power to do, so they should. But you can't say they have to.
The constitutional requirement is that he BE natural born. Not that anyone has to take any specific step to verify it. So there are two problems.
One, nobody has violated any rule or law concerning the qualifications of Presidential candidates. Maybe there should be stricter laws.
Two, nobody has demonstrated, as a matter of fact, that he really is ineligible. So you can't just assume that the constitutional requirement has even been violated.
You asked me the same question.
To an afterbirther:
“I answered it, and showed you in the constitution exactly where it specifies that the office requires that the candidate be a “Natural Born” citizen, and why.
What is gained by asking different people the same question?
You know the answer...time to move on, unless that is all you have, which is pathetic.”
We are getting a taste of the afterbirthers once their Dear Leader is exposed as a traitor. You see, the constitution does not mean what it says, everyone lies about their citizenship...etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.