Posted on 09/15/2009 12:50:19 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
This past May, a fossil nicknamed Ida was loudly heralded by the evolutionary scientific community as the long-sought-after “missing link” that supposedly proved ape-to-human evolution. Directly following the unveiling, ICR News reported reasons why Ida, in fact, linked nothing, being merely an extinct variety of lemur.[1]
ICR News also predicted what has now occurred with Ida’s popularity campaign, stating, “After further study, however, this claim will be quietly rescinded.”[2] Ida has been surreptitiously...
(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...
No prediction just pointing out another lie.
Looks like Ira just admitted that GGG is prevailing.
Too bad he can't bring some of those absolutely wonderful counter-arguments that only exist over on fark.com.
You'd be toast fer shur GGG. LOL!
This past May, a fossil nicknamed Ida was loudly heralded by the evolutionary scientific community as the long-sought-after “missing link” that supposedly proved ape-to-human evolution.
This, Brian....IS A LIE. Ida is not provided as evidence of a missing link between apes and humans. Ida is claimed to be a ("a", not "THE") "missing link" from much further back in human evolution than any human-to-ape link. Cherry picking scientists and statements is so typical of you, Brian. Bet that scientists doesn't believe that Ida died 4,351 years ago.
A BEAUTIFULLY preserved 47-million-year-old fossil from a German shale pit is the “missing link”, the earliest ancestor of all living monkeys, apes and people
How EXACTLY does that mean that "Ida is the missing link between apes and humans"? Speaky englis?
Hint: the ancseter OF ALL primates.....a link between "primates" and "not primates." Selective quoting....cute. Using the words of a reporter....super-cute. How about the words of THE ACTUAL RESEARCHERS?
This past May, a fossil nicknamed Ida was loudly heralded by the evolutionary scientific community as the long-sought-after “missing link” that supposedly proved ape-to-human evolution.
“Riiiiight...now this is curious because I don’ t recall the part about scientists tripping all over themselves to correct said “media idiot”...”
—Just the day before this story was posted, there was another story posted complaining about the circus created by the countless interviews of scientists, and articles in science magazines, and the tv specials, websites, and book, etc etc... I guess all of that wasn’t enough to correct a single mistaken article (I think it was the New York Post)?
And will you call your bretherin to account for calling it “evoloserism”?
No. You only care when your own retarded ox gets gored.
Rather than being something that someone cannot help, it is a choice of willful ignorance.
The more one knows, especially about science, the less likely they are to be a Creationist.
Thus Creationism tailors their message to their target audience. Those who have willingly retarded their intellectual and theological progress... the Cretarded.
Of course if Brian Thomas* says it, it is true.
Someone post the creev flow chart and give #s to the straw men. That way they can save electrons. Instead of a long screed, they can post #s.
Example:” This is a lie because of 5,10, and 3”.
That would save us all a lot of time.
Ira where did you learn to bloviate such drivel?
Every word of your post is nonsense. There have been numerous standing offers to debate the evoliars going back into the ‘50s offering significant cash, and none have ever been taken.
When you have to stick to provable fact, the evos are just not there. They all depend on media propagandists rather than science to make their case.
Thanks for the ping!
Thanks for the ping!
“Personally I doubt you last more than 2 or 3 post as best without being exposed.
But go ahead and sign up, defend your position outside of this echo chamber without your cheerleaders.” [excerpt]
“You are all hat and no cattle, and each time you run and hide you prove my point.” [excerpt]
“Can you not prevail in a debate without your cheerleaders?” [excerpt]Say, Ira, are all your friends over at fark afraid to come over here and sign up?
I had to go look that one up...LOL!
project-alot entry number 4,867,673,523.
Ummmm “a single mistaken article”???
National Geographic...the Guardian, pmsnbc, you mean single mistaken CLAIM backed by a stream of articles!
“National Geographic...the Guardian, pmsnbc, you mean single mistaken CLAIM backed by a stream of articles!”
—Nat Geo claimed that Ida was an intermediate between apes and humans? Where?
Hmmm.. won’t answer honestly. So noted.
LOL...like you have some kind of special integrity to make observations about anyone’s honesty?
Plllllllllease!
See this post right here, then crawl back in your hole.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2341320/posts?page=13#13
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.