Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery Immediately

Resistnet ^ | September 10, 2009 | Phil Dedrick

[moonpie57]

I just talked to Orly:

She has 2 good news items that she is very busy with right now:

1. Judge Carter is ‘giving her expedited discovery - immediately’.

2. Judge Land will allow her to present before the court in GA. She is leaving now to fly to GA to appear before Judge Land at the Federal Building in Columbus, GA at 2:00 pm tomorrow (Friday, 9/11/09).

She would like as many military supporters to be there as possible. I called Carl Swensson (RiseUpForAmerica.com), and he will see what he can do. If you have any contacts there, please advise them.

[Aurorales]

But I wanna know nowwwwwwww!!

Sorry. After over a year of this Barry BC story, my patience is extremely thin.

Praying, praying, and praying again as usual.

[etraveler13]

I tend to agree. Carter is all about fairness and proper procedures. He gave the opposition until Oct 5 to present its case for MTD (Motion to Drop), I think it seems unlikely that he would change that without very good reason, and also without first notifying the DOJ..

I would like to be wrong, however, I don’t think so.

[American Constitutionalist]

Maybe Obama , the Democrats and their henchmen are working on contingency plans now in case Obama is found out.

[patriot08]

I found this letter to WND that explains the problem between Dr. Orly and Kreep: To: “Jerome Corsi” Cc: “Orly Taitz, Atty OC” , “Jan Herron, CO” Mr. Corsi, sorry I missed your call yesterday. My phone went nuts after the hearing. I want to set the record straight about Mr. Drake, Mr. Robinson, and their attorney Mr. Creep being granted permission to adjoin their case to ours. Yes, I am one of 48 plaintiffs in this case and I was one of the first to sign on. So far 46 of us have supported Ms. Taitz in her lawsuit. Only 2 plaintiffs have withdrawn and have been causing trouble and distraction by trying to hire a new attorney and sneak back into OUR case. They should have filed their own lawsuit, but they chose to selfishly make waves along with Kreep and his associates. Yesterday’s antics at the hearing by Kreep were disgusting and documented well in this media post: http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2009/09/08/obama-birthplace-lawsuit-in-oc-plauged-by-infighting/21081/ 7 of us plaintiff witnesses were there to support Orly and we all rejected Kreep coming into the case during the break to “work it out”. But Kreep refused to back down of course. The judge let him back in ONLY in the name of time and expediency otherwise Kreep and his clients would have been told to take a hike and file their own suit. We all witnessed it and the transcripts would clearly show it. Kreep and his clients got very lucky, but no they just need to let this move forward. So, here’s where we are (and your future reporting needs to reflect these REALITIES if you keep mentioning Gary Kreep) 1. Yes, Kreep has technically been allowed to enter the case as “co-counsel”, but - 2. Kreep only represents 2 plaintiffs out of 48. Most of the rest of us have retained Ms. Taitz as our attorney and do not recognize Kreep as lead counsel or even co-counsel. He’s just a secondary or sub attorney on the case. Orly is lead counsel and will make all final, binding decisions on behalf of us plaintiffs. Any further attempts to delay these proceedings by Mr. Kreep (he delayed a hearing yesterday from Sept. 11 to Oct. 5), will not be tolerated and we will take all necessary legal action to stop any more of his antics. 3. Ms. Taitz has a large team of experienced attorneys assisting her now. If Mr. Kreep remains on this case he will be expected to give his professional input, but defer to OUR lead attorney, Ms. Taitz and not argue with her in open court. 4. As you may or may not be aware, Mr. Kreep has a horrible reputation in Southern California among grass-roots activists and Patriot groups. His latest court gimmick yesterday was just another in a long string of selfish games that Kreep has been playing. Everyone is on to him here and watching his every move from now on. He will be tarred and feathered if he in any way hurts our case. His days of damaging Ms. Taitz’ efforts to get to the truth are OVER! Just a friendly warning to those who continue to support and promote Gary Kreep in this case. On behalf of the veteran plaintiffs, Jeff Schwilk MSgt, USMC (Retired) Bcc: Plaintiffs

[patriot08]

Sorry the above is all jammed up together, but I don’t know how to fix it.

[Frantzie]

???? I hope it is true but it makes no sense that a Judge would say be back here on Oct 5th for motion to dismiss but be ready for discovery then issue this.

Not impossible but sounds fishy????

[roaddog727]

I have been discussing this action with CPT Rhodes for most of the day.

She will likely not be in Court for this. She has been ordered to have some sort of out-brief or Discussion with an O6 in her chain of command tomorrow in Kansas.

More games. More attempts to trip her up. This O6 is clearly exerting undue command influence on her actions.

[roaddog727]

Bumperoo!

[etraveler13]

Can you comment on the basis of this thread? Do you have documentation from the Judge that allows discovery? Otherwise its just heresay...

[meadsjn]

I don’t know about the Civil War

The Civil War was an internal dispute.

What has happened in the US now is a communist takeover by internal and external enemies of the US, financed by a former Hitler Youth who sold out his own family members to the NAZIs, and muslim terrorists who really don't like us much.

[Aurorales]

I will bet those plans have already been made.

I guess they could just be going over them one last time before the SHTF.

I could just see Barry, Biden, Clinton, Pelousy, and others (McCain?) sitting close together in the Oval Office repeating a twisted, instruction filled nursery rhyme over and over again to get the plan straight.

(Just like in the movie “The Dirty Dozen”.)

[etraveler13]

They need to post documentation from the Judge that gives them authority, otherwise its just hearsay...

It does more damage to start rumors, get everybody worked up and then disappointed. We got this far by dealing with facts, and until they are presented, we do Orly Taits a disservice by runnin off on rabbit trails.

Until documentation or an official statement is made by the lead attorney, or the judge. I cannot and will not believe it.

[etraveler13]

Are you having fun stirring the pot? FDLMAO...
Somebody is ribbing us, I think.

[rxsid]

Looks to be true!

Filed & Entered: 09/10/2009 Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19633550/03118745409

Filed & Entered: 09/10/2009 Ex Parte Application for Order re Discovery Matter

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19633565/03118746941

and

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19633559/03118746940

[roamer_1]

I have good sources who say that this story is not true.

Thank you for your very concise reporting. Your sources are good enough for me. :D

[Aurorales]

I thought I was only stirring my own pot tonight?

[Faith]

Post from Resistnet.com

Reply by Phil Dedrick (OATH KEEPER) 4 hours ago
You can email these patriots, I have followed them all for many months and they never put out anything false, that is for sure...

Edward C. Noonan ednoonan@4xtreme.org
Neil Turner NBTurner@earthlink.net
Jeff Schwilk jeffschwilk@cox.net OR stopxspp@qmail.com

We are in the process of making this go viral, I have already emailed this info. to J.B. Williams of CanadaFreePress.com , so if you have contacts, please make this go viral, btw, I have not emailed this to worldnetdaily.com as of yet..., but I assure you this will be their front story tomorrow morning...

[Hypo]

[knarf]

I found this letter to WND that explains the problem between Dr. Orly and Kreep:

To: “Jerome Corsi”

Cc: “Orly Taitz, Atty OC” ,

“Jan Herron, CO”

Mr. Corsi, sorry I missed your call yesterday. My phone went nuts after the hearing.

I want to set the record straight about Mr. Drake, Mr. Robinson, and their attorney Mr. Creep being granted permission to adjoin their case to ours.

Yes, I am one of 48 plaintiffs in this case and I was one of the first to sign on. So far 46 of us have supported Ms. Taitz in her lawsuit. Only 2 plaintiffs have withdrawn and have been causing trouble and distraction by trying to hire a new attorney and sneak back into OUR case. They should have filed their own lawsuit, but they chose to selfishly make waves along with Kreep and his associates.

Yesterday’s antics at the hearing by Kreep were disgusting and documented well in this media post:

http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2009/09/08/obama-birthplace-lawsuit-in-oc-plauged-by-infighting/21081/

7 of us plaintiff witnesses were there to support Orly and we all rejected Kreep coming into the case during the break to “work it out”. But Kreep refused to back down of course. The judge let him back in ONLY in the name of time and expediency otherwise Kreep and his clients would have been told to take a hike and file their own suit.

We all witnessed it and the transcripts would clearly show it.

Kreep and his clients got very lucky, but no they just need to let this move forward.

So, here’s where we are (and your future reporting needs to reflect these REALITIES if you keep mentioning Gary Kreep)

1. Yes, Kreep has technically been allowed to enter the case as “co-counsel”, but -

2. Kreep only represents 2 plaintiffs out of 48.

Most of the rest of us have retained Ms. Taitz as our attorney and do not recognize Kreep as lead counsel or even co-counsel. He’s just a secondary or sub attorney on the case. Orly is lead counsel and will make all final, binding decisions on behalf of us plaintiffs.

Any further attempts to delay these proceedings by Mr. Kreep (he delayed a hearing yesterday from Sept. 11 to Oct. 5), will not be tolerated and we will take all necessary legal action to stop any more of his antics.

3. Ms. Taitz has a large team of experienced attorneys assisting her now. If Mr. Kreep remains on this case he will be expected to give his professional input, but defer to OUR lead attorney, Ms. Taitz and not argue with her in open court.

4. As you may or may not be aware, Mr. Kreep has a horrible reputation in Southern California among grass-roots activists and Patriot groups. His latest court gimmick yesterday was just another in a long string of selfish games that Kreep has been playing. Everyone is on to him here and watching his every move from now on. He will be tarred and feathered if he in any way hurts our case. His days of damaging Ms. Taitz’ efforts to get to the truth are OVER!

Just a friendly warning to those who continue to support and promote Gary Kreep in this case. On behalf of the veteran plaintiffs, Jeff Schwilk MSgt, USMC (Retired)

Bcc: Plaintiffs

[patlin]

I hope it is true but it makes no sense that a Judge would say be back here on Oct 5th for motion to dismiss but be ready for discovery then issue this. Not impossible but sounds fishy

Yes, it does sound fishy however not completely out of the ball park. Military stick together and a flight surgeon in combat is of the most extreme importance, not so easy to replace so maybe Carter is having some influence in the GA court. With action overseas igniting again, this seems the most plausible reason for immediate discovery to me and remember Cook's case, he received his retraction of orders the day before. So far no orders have been retracted for Rhodes. Just thinking out loud using common sense here.