Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery Immediately
Resistnet ^ | September 10, 2009 | Phil Dedrick

Posted on 09/10/2009 9:42:35 PM PDT by moonpie57

I just talked to Orly:

She has 2 good news items that she is very busy with right now:

1. Judge Carter is ‘giving her expedited discovery - immediately’.

2. Judge Land will allow her to present before the court in GA. She is leaving now to fly to GA to appear before Judge Land at the Federal Building in Columbus, GA at 2:00 pm tomorrow (Friday, 9/11/09).

She would like as many military supporters to be there as possible. I called Carl Swensson (RiseUpForAmerica.com), and he will see what he can do. If you have any contacts there, please advise them.

(Excerpt) Read more at resistnet.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; judgedavidcarter; kenya; lucassmith; naturalborn; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,141-1,151 next last
To: pissant

PS, the decision I cited was written by Alito.


501 posted on 09/11/2009 12:34:33 PM PDT by steviep96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Since you believe that, based on previous dismissals, are you going to change your opinion if/when one or more cases are not tossed?

If that happens then I'll be be interested in reading the judges ruling. But if Judge Carter does not grant the motion to dismiss I'll accept his decision. I will not be whining about unfair judges or conspiracies or God knows what other excuse. Unlike you and your buddies.

502 posted on 09/11/2009 12:34:53 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: steviep96

It has nothing to do with this case or subject matter.


503 posted on 09/11/2009 12:35:01 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The Constitution and Bill of Rights leveled the playing field. The question is, does the Constitution still stand. It gives citizens the right to question government and expect answers. The people are the power, not the government.

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. And force, like fire, is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." George Washington

"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed and that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of press." Thomas Jefferson

"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of society but the people themselves and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform them." James Madison

504 posted on 09/11/2009 12:35:30 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Taitz's plaintiff has to suffer real harm. An injury in fact to a legally protected interest. One that is clearly identified, and which has occured or is imminent. This injury must be actual, not conjectural or hypothetical. What's the injury suffered in this case?

Here's the injury. It's very simple even a caveman can understand it and possibly ignorant trolls. Obama being the de facto commander in chief, and especially since the US is fighting wars, he has to be Constitutionally qualified to give orders, and since hostile actions are occurring he gives orders to put members of the Armed Forces in harms way. Harms way is possible death or injury to the Service Member. Simple, easy to understand, unless you are a complete idiot or a troll. Therefore, the Taitz's plaintiffs have STANDING.

505 posted on 09/11/2009 12:37:45 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: pissant

But it has to do with taxpayer standing to sue.

I think that the cases that have the best shot are cases filed by other candidates and - maybe - members of the military.

I don’t think that you or I can just sue the president into revealing his birth certificate because our taxes went up.


506 posted on 09/11/2009 12:38:40 PM PDT by steviep96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: steviep96

It’s not out of context but only to non Sequitur trolls.


507 posted on 09/11/2009 12:39:59 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: steviep96; Red Steel

Go to the following link and scroll down to page 5 of the summary presented there on. At the first Para which begins with Kreep, read it and the next. He states his concern regarding delays. Now I don’t know if that is a verbatum quote or someone’s rememberance.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19547316/Keyes-v-Obama-Motions-Hearing-8SEP-2009


508 posted on 09/11/2009 12:40:01 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The case in front of Judge Carter has people who ran in the election against Obama. They have standing and they have been harmed.

Avoid feeding tr**ls.


509 posted on 09/11/2009 12:40:17 PM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

It is a conspiracy with Obama as the puppet and Soros pulling the strings. America is going down and you have your fingers in your ears while you sing.


510 posted on 09/11/2009 12:40:44 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

That actually seems more like potential harm to me. And there is no cause of action for potential harm.

This is going down a morbid path, but the best approach may be to get a wounded service member to file.


511 posted on 09/11/2009 12:41:14 PM PDT by steviep96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
No one believes you except a few trolls,... *ell I doubt if they believe you.

Based on what I've seen from you to date, the day you start agreeing with me on anything is the day I start questioning my own sanity.

512 posted on 09/11/2009 12:41:33 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

They wont say a word, I totally agree, they choose thier jobs over the nation ...


513 posted on 09/11/2009 12:43:14 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

It has nothing to do with me or you “accepting” it. Obviously, unless we get directly involved, we have no say, or influence on Judge Carter or anyone else. Just because a judge says something, does not make it correct.

For example, Kelo was wrongly and unconstitutionally decided. I don’t give a crap what the liberal tyrants in black pulled out of their butts to justify it. It needs to be remedied via legislation. Some states have already done so. And the House and Senate need to get busy and do so on a federal level.


514 posted on 09/11/2009 12:43:26 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: deport

OC reporter Martin Wisckol, Politics reporter quotes him verbatim:

http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2009/09/08/obama-birthplace-lawsuit-in-oc-plauged-by-infighting/21081/


515 posted on 09/11/2009 12:43:46 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: steviep96

If the president is not qualified, a soldier following his orders is not protected as the soldier is committing illegal acts.


516 posted on 09/11/2009 12:43:58 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: steviep96

I don’t care what you think


517 posted on 09/11/2009 12:44:13 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Perhaps it's why the (R)'s haven't moved on this. 1) They are waiting to get the majority in 2010 which, then, if Barry, Biden and Nanzi are found to be frauds in one way or another...they can nominate the Pro-tempore who would (at least) be temp President and 2) they know that adjudicating this through the courts will take a long time (hoping, perhaps to have it wrapped up post mid-terms).

Yes, the audible is terrible...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNb6nRG67gg&feature=player_embedded
"In related news, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) weighs in on his view that taking the eligibility issue through the Judiciary would take too long to resolve to matter: ... I have to wonder — if the man knows about the issue and agrees that there is a constitutional question here, why isn’t he raising this in committee? Too much Dem resistance? Perhaps." http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=7217

518 posted on 09/11/2009 12:45:31 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Here's the injury. It's very simple even a caveman can understand it and possibly ignorant trolls. Obama being the de facto commander in chief, and especially since the US is fighting wars, he has to be Constitutionally qualified to give orders, and since hostile actions are occurring he gives orders to put members of the Armed Forces in harms way. Harms way is possible death or injury to the Service Member. Simple, easy to understand, unless you are a complete idiot or a troll. Therefore, the Taitz's plaintiffs have STANDING.

And that is as BS as the rest of your stuff. What part of 'actual' is so hard for you to comprehend? Or is it the definition of 'conjectural' and 'hypothetical' that is causing you problems?

519 posted on 09/11/2009 12:46:03 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: steviep96
This is going down a morbid path, but the best approach may be to get a wounded service member to file.

Potential harm is plenty for standing.

520 posted on 09/11/2009 12:46:31 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,141-1,151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson