[Red Steel]

Taitz's plaintiff has to suffer real harm. An injury in fact to a legally protected interest. One that is clearly identified, and which has occured or is imminent. This injury must be actual, not conjectural or hypothetical. What's the injury suffered in this case?

Here's the injury. It's very simple even a caveman can understand it and possibly ignorant trolls. Obama being the de facto commander in chief, and especially since the US is fighting wars, he has to be Constitutionally qualified to give orders, and since hostile actions are occurring he gives orders to put members of the Armed Forces in harms way. Harms way is possible death or injury to the Service Member. Simple, easy to understand, unless you are a complete idiot or a troll. Therefore, the Taitz's plaintiffs have STANDING.

[steviep96]

That actually seems more like potential harm to me. And there is no cause of action for potential harm.

This is going down a morbid path, but the best approach may be to get a wounded service member to file.

[Non-Sequitur]

Here's the injury. It's very simple even a caveman can understand it and possibly ignorant trolls. Obama being the de facto commander in chief, and especially since the US is fighting wars, he has to be Constitutionally qualified to give orders, and since hostile actions are occurring he gives orders to put members of the Armed Forces in harms way. Harms way is possible death or injury to the Service Member. Simple, easy to understand, unless you are a complete idiot or a troll. Therefore, the Taitz's plaintiffs have STANDING.

And that is as BS as the rest of your stuff. What part of 'actual' is so hard for you to comprehend? Or is it the definition of 'conjectural' and 'hypothetical' that is causing you problems?

[stockpirate]

It is useless fighting with NON-sq, he has the non for a reason, like non-conservative.