Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's regulatory chief pushes new 'bill of rights'
WorldNetDaily ^ | SEPTEMBER 10, 2009 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 09/10/2009 9:42:21 PM PDT by RobinMasters

NEW YORK – A government that is constitutionally required to offer each citizen a "useful" job in the farms or industries of the nation.

A country whose leadership intercedes to ensure every farmer can sell his product for a good return.

A nation that has the power to act against "unfair competition" and monopolies in business.

This is not a description of Cuba, communist China, or the USSR until 1991. It's the vision of the future of the U.S, as mandated by a radical new "bill of rights" drawn up and pushed by President Obama's newly confirmed regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein. Until now, Sunstein's proposal has received little scrutiny.

In 2004, Sunstein penned a book, "The Second Bill of Rights: FDR'S Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More than Ever," in which he advanced the radical notion that welfare rights, including some controversial inceptions, be granted by the state. His inspiration for a new bill of rights came from President Roosevelt's 1944 proposal of a different, new set of bill of rights.

WND has learned that in April 2005, Sunstein opened up a conference at Yale Law School entitled "The Constitution in 2020," which sought to change the nature and interpretation of the Constitution by that year.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1944; 2004; 2020; casssunstein; communism; constitution; entitlements; fdr; needmorelampposts; power; propertyrights; revisionism; roosevelt; secondbillofrights; sunstein; thoushaltnotsteal; yale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2009 9:42:21 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
"In what sense is the money in our pockets and bank accounts fully ‘ours’? Did we earn it by our own autonomous efforts? Could we have inherited it without the assistance of probate courts? Do we save it without the support of bank regulators? Could we spend it if there were no public officials to coordinate the efforts and pool the resources of the community in which we live?... Without taxes there would be no liberty. Without taxes there would be no property. Without taxes, few of us would have any assets worth defending. [It is] a dim fiction that some people enjoy and exercise their rights without placing any burden whatsoever on the public… There is no liberty without dependency."

- Cass Sunstein, Regulatory Czar

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein

2 posted on 09/10/2009 9:45:29 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Which was the lie, 0bummer: 47 or 30 million uninsured?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
I repeat:

"THERE IS NO LIBERTY WITHOUT DEPENDENCY."

- Cass Sunstein, 0bummer's Regulatory Czar

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein

3 posted on 09/10/2009 9:47:13 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Which was the lie, 0bummer: 47 or 30 million uninsured?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

4 posted on 09/10/2009 9:47:58 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Which was the lie, 0bummer: 47 or 30 million uninsured?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

"Liberty is Dependency"

- Big Brother Sunstein

5 posted on 09/10/2009 9:49:14 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Which was the lie, 0bummer: 47 or 30 million uninsured?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; traderrob6; OL Hickory; socialismisinsidious; trlambsr; Altera; ...

Ping.


6 posted on 09/10/2009 9:49:51 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Sunstein is phenomenally dangerous, definitely a standout. Another among many, he is to be carefully watched. He will be one of the most agressive communist idealogues in the 0bama regime.


7 posted on 09/10/2009 9:52:14 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (It's better to give a Ford to the Kidney Foundation than a kidney to the Ford Foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
The day obama tries to undo the Bill Of Rights is the day the revolution begins. I will fight for my Country against an un-Constitutional socialist takeover.
8 posted on 09/10/2009 9:58:24 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Tick....Tock...


9 posted on 09/10/2009 10:03:13 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Hopefully his dog will sue him.


10 posted on 09/10/2009 10:05:54 PM PDT by Rannug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rannug

LOL !


11 posted on 09/10/2009 10:22:31 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

So, what does it really mean (the oath) “to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” How does one go about protecting and defending the Constitution? It is pretty obvious that it has both foreign and domestic enemies.


12 posted on 09/10/2009 10:27:36 PM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rannug

Someone should bring a suit on behalf of his dog for Slavery.


13 posted on 09/10/2009 10:28:41 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Which was the lie, 0bummer: 47 or 30 million uninsured?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

“Someone should bring a suit on behalf of his dog for Slavery.”

That’s doggist! More generically, Pettist!


14 posted on 09/10/2009 10:34:25 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (It's better to give a Ford to the Kidney Foundation than a kidney to the Ford Foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

This may be the stupidest thing I have ever read and I am sure he feels that he is brilliant to have written it. Of course in the purest and theoretical sense there is no complete liberty without some dependence. But this is like the physicist who knows that there are spaces in between atoms and in theory you can walk through a wall...but you don’t DO it. Or the old idea that you really CAN’T walk across a room. You can’t separate out pieces of reality and then act on that. If you take a flower apart and put the leaves and petals and stems in a jar you do not then have a “flower” though the parts are there. Essentially this is what he is doing with ideas like freedom. Freedom is a wholistic CONCEPT and leftists do not deal well with CONCEPTS. They simply have a bunch of parts and they really are not able to conceptualize them to make sense as a whole. Some chip is missing in this guy’s brain.


15 posted on 09/10/2009 10:36:15 PM PDT by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Well, it appears that none of the “czars” have been vetted nor taken the oath — albeit they take the pay.

How can that be?


16 posted on 09/10/2009 10:39:25 PM PDT by Bhoy (Joe Wilson said it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Actually what this shows is these people have no idea how things get done or how the world works. They can’t fix anything, make anythng or do anything worthwhile. They talk for a living.


17 posted on 09/10/2009 10:42:21 PM PDT by Bhoy (Joe Wilson said it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

If you do not see that we are being attacked by communists by now then you are willfully ignorant, a Democrat, or a thick-headed, McCain type Republican.


18 posted on 09/10/2009 10:57:21 PM PDT by Boucheau (Who is John Galt? "I am the first man of ability who refused to regard it as guilt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

“aggressive communist idealogue”

There is no other kind, FRiend.


19 posted on 09/10/2009 10:59:54 PM PDT by Boucheau (Who is John Galt? "I am the first man of ability who refused to regard it as guilt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

In his new book, The Second Bill of Rights, Sunstein seeks to give constitutional status to welfare rights. The title comes from Franklin Roosevelt’s 1944 State of the Union address, in which he proclaimed that “necessitous men are not free men” and proposed a “second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all.” Among the rights FDR proposed were the rights to “a useful and remunerative job,” “a decent home,” “adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health,” “adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment,” and “a good education.”

More. A collection of quotes attributed to Cass Sunstein. It is beleived that these quotes are accurate.
http://stopsunstein.com/media/pdf/Sunstein%20quote%20file.pdf


20 posted on 09/10/2009 11:00:25 PM PDT by anglian (0bama's Stealth Reparations: "Mouthfulls of 'Gimme' and handfulls of 'Much 0bliged'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson