Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Birthers Get Their Day in Court – Obama Must Now Prove His Citizenship
examiner.com ^ | September 9, 2009 | Kimberly Dvorak

Posted on 09/10/2009 4:54:47 AM PDT by kellynla

Americans’ who do not believe President Obama is a U.S. citizen won a huge decision in California as a judge set three court dates, one of which will require the President to prove his citizenship.

The case will be heard by U.S. District Judge David Carter in Southern California, it is the first time the merits of the President’s citizenship will be argued in open court.

The first obstacle the plaintiffs will have to overcome is an October 5 motion to dismiss as well as the arguments on the issue of discovery. From there the plaintiffs will have to navigate a pretrial hearing before Judge Carter will hear the case tentatively set for January 26, 2010.

According to Jeff Schwilk, who was in the courtroom, the judge was solid as a rock. “The audience of about 45 was nodding and giving thumbs up to each other on almost all of his decisions.”

“He (the judge) is determined to get Obama to prove he is eligible,” Schwilk explained. “Things are going to move very fast.”

However, Judge Carter hasn’t ruled on the discovery motion, which is the right to see the President’s still-concealed records. Judge Carter didn’t rule on the motion to dismiss either.

The next few weeks will tell if the California plaintiffs will actually be able to challenge President Obama in open court.

The lawsuit claims President Obama is actually a citizen of Indonesia or Kenya. This would violate the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, it says, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of the President.”

The records put forth by the President show that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth took place in Hawaii.

“It’s pretty close to check mate, but of course the Obama team will try to come up with something to get their way,” Schwilk finished.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: article2section1; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; eligibility; obama; obamanoncitizenissue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-315 next last
To: wolfcreek
I see Barry’s lawyers slapping down the same bogus piece of paper he posted on his website and saying this is it, you get no more.

But at least it will be a physical piece of paper and not an electronic copy. Experts can determine if it's a forgery or if it's been tampered with if they can examine it.

61 posted on 09/10/2009 6:14:16 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bluebeard16
Remember the court date is 1/26/10. The election is just prior to that date.

This is what confused me.

62 posted on 09/10/2009 6:15:55 AM PDT by pilipo (GOP=Gutless Old Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

Dr, Edwin Viera who is an attorney and pretty sharp on constitutional issues has said if a scenario likes this plays out - the Joint Cheifs may have to move to have the military remove him from office if he does not resign.

You will also probably have 55% or more of the country wanting him to go. The sooner Judge Carter gets a answer the better because the 2010 elections are coming.


63 posted on 09/10/2009 6:16:13 AM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
Wonder why he didn't rule on this motion? The case can't move forward without discovery...

First he has to rule on the defense's motion to dismiss. They submitted that last week, and the judge gave Taitz 30 days to respond. They'll have a hearing on that October 5th and following that the judge will either grant or deny the motion. If he grants it, game over. If he denies it, then discovery can be started in earnest.

64 posted on 09/10/2009 6:17:02 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
“give it a rest?”

I'll “give it a rest” when Hussein provides his ORIGINAL Birth Certificate...and not a second sooner, thank you.

65 posted on 09/10/2009 6:17:41 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64; wolfcreek
Already, Axelrod, in consultation with 0dinga, Van Jones, and Emanuel, has ordered the Secret Service to take possession of Barry's body scans (among them, bottom-of-the-foot scans) done at Walter Reed.

Too bad they were digitized scans from the start!   After all, who's good at recognizing a stream of apparently meaningless, inconvenienced electrons zipping around the globe?

Multiple fingerprint experts have already determined that Barry's baby footprint matches the big boy's. Now it's just a question of when the testimony will be heard, hopefully in open court, and appropriately acted upon.

HF
P.S. ...and no, I don't really know this, or at least, "all of it."

66 posted on 09/10/2009 6:18:02 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
A presidential recall and new election.

Nothing in the Constitution allows for a recall or a new election. Odds are it's President Biden for the duration. And if Biden gets tossed too, then God help us but it's President Pelosi.

67 posted on 09/10/2009 6:18:35 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I see...thanks for the explanation


68 posted on 09/10/2009 6:19:34 AM PDT by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Bluebeard16
The election is just prior to that date.

Ten and a half months after, you mean.

69 posted on 09/10/2009 6:20:03 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
“The entire Federal Judiciary?”

Last I checked, Judge Carter is part of the “Federal Judiciary”.

Now run along and quit bothering me with your lame posts.

70 posted on 09/10/2009 6:21:24 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan

What if there is no proof that Obama is NOT a native born US citizen?

What if no one can decide the definition of “natural born?”

If there is no legal definition, and the case defaults to the law about “native born”, and there’s no way to prove he is NOT, then what?

His mother’s and grandparents residences, attendance at college, and other small items establish Obama’s PRESENCE in the US as an infant. Granted he could have been a week or two old before he actually arrived, but if there’s no way to prove otherwise, then I think it defaults to the US Constitution’s failure to define natural born or to establish a body to oversee eligibility.

All he has to say is “there is no original birth certificate. It was lost. But, we have all this circumstantial and testimonial evidence.”


71 posted on 09/10/2009 6:21:26 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

If this is so important to this judge, I don’t understand that he can’t CLEAR HIS DOCKET to move this along. I know legal things move slowly, but this nation can’t wait much longer!


72 posted on 09/10/2009 6:21:28 AM PDT by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat

The Judge is used to being in impossible situations. He was wounded and received a Purple Heart and Bronze Star at Khe Sanh in Vietnam. If anyone knows about that battle, they will understand.

The cat is out of the bag on Obama too. Probably 55% of the population do NOT like him and after last night the number could go higher. He is no longer hip but an embarassing joke.

He will send an order to Hawaii to provide the documents. Obama can try to appeal but once Carter tells HI to pony up the Long Form BC - Hussein is in big trouble. They will try to file a protective order to keep it secret for in-camera examination but why? What is there to hide?


73 posted on 09/10/2009 6:21:40 AM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
his is in essence a quo warranto action against Obama, and as such, is a lawsuit against him in his personal capacity so there are no separation of powers or jurisdictional issues.

A Writ of Quo Warrento cannot be brought by anyone except the United States in any district court except for the D.C. district.

74 posted on 09/10/2009 6:25:18 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You are correct! Coffee has not yet kicked in!


75 posted on 09/10/2009 6:25:30 AM PDT by Bluebeard16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: xzins

[All he has to say is “there is no original birth certificate.]

Then what did he use for passport ID, college applications etc. etc.?


76 posted on 09/10/2009 6:26:35 AM PDT by RetSignman (Townhalls ..."We have seen the Patriots and they are us")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Bluebeard16
Yes they are. With a Republican controlled House and Senate we might just get justice. (I’m thinking positively here.)

Even if that happens it's 16 months away.

77 posted on 09/10/2009 6:26:44 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Lawyers can raise issues regardless of merit and tie things up in court for eons. Anyway:

“...discussions in Congress suggest that Quo Warranto does not apply to Constitutional Officers whose election, appointment and removal are explicitly described in the Constitution.”
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/07/13/quo-warranto-no-applicable-to-the-president/


78 posted on 09/10/2009 6:26:59 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mbynack

We have got to pound him with everything we got


79 posted on 09/10/2009 6:27:31 AM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

How is it that Biden would be appointed as Pres? If Obama is found to be a fraud, then his entire candidacy was fraudulent. Doesn’t that make his election to the presidency fraudulent ex post facto? That should nullify everything and mandate an immediate new vote for president, no?


80 posted on 09/10/2009 6:27:44 AM PDT by rarestia (Confutatis maledictis, voca me cum benedictis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-315 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson