Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Risks of the Swine Flu Vaccine (Experimental adjuvant squalene implicated in autoimmune disorders)
http://www.thenewamerican.com ^ | Thursday, 03 September 2009 | Alex Newman

Posted on 09/03/2009 10:17:06 PM PDT by Maelstorm

The coming swine flu vaccination campaign is expected to begin in October. But with vaccine safety tests being fast-tracked under “public health emergency” rules and the use of some questionable ingredients, many health experts are warning about a myriad of risks associated with the vaccine and the importance of being educated.

“Right now, you need to become educated about vaccination, influenza, vaccine risks and the public health laws in your state,” warned Barbara Loe Fisher, the president of the National Vaccine Information Center. “You need to find out what your rights and options are under new public health laws that may require you — and your children — to be vaccinated or quarantined.”

So what are the risks of the swine flu vaccines? It depends on who you ask.

“There can be no argument that unnecessary mass injection of millions of children with a vaccine containing an adjuvant known to cause a host of debilitating autoimmune diseases is a reckless, dangerous plan,” explained Dr. Joseph Mercola, a health activist, author and strong critic of the swine flu immunization program. He proceeds to provide evidence justifying his concerns.

The adjuvant Mercola is referring to is based on an oil known as squalene. It is used to reduce the amount of viral antigen required in vaccines, which allows companies to produce more vaccines for less money at a faster rate.

But according to countless medical professionals and experts, using it in immunizations is a bad idea. It is also going to be somewhat experimental. There isn’t a single vaccine containing squalene that is approved for use in America, according to Meryl Nass, M.D., who notes that Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline will make use of it as a “novel feature of the H1N1 vaccines.”

Squalene is a naturally occurring oil, found in the human brain, joints, and other places. The problem, according to some experts, comes when it is administered in a vaccine. They claim that in this circumstance, the body creates antibodies to attack the oil. And it is believed by many to be responsible for the wide variety of symptoms that were called collectively "Gulf War Syndrome," a sometimes debilitating set of phenomena present in a large number of U.S. military personnel who served during the first war in Iraq.

“The substantial majority (95%) of overtly ill deployed GWS patients had antibodies to squalene. All (100%) GWS patients immunized for service in Desert Shield/Desert Storm who did not deploy, but had the same signs and symptoms as those who did deploy, had antibodies to squalene,” noted a Tulane Medical School study published in Experimental Molecular Pathology. “In contrast, none (0%) of the deployed Persian Gulf veterans not showing signs and symptoms of GWS have antibodies to squalene.” The study has been challenged, but it is still widely cited.

Another study published in the American Journal of Pathology highlighted problems with the use of the substance as well. One injection of squalene into rats led them to develop what humans know as rheumatoid arthritis, or “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation.”

Another potential risk from the vaccine was highlighted by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, the chairman of the health committee in the German parliament and the European Council. As reported in an article entitled "German health expert’s flu warning — Does virus vaccine increase risk of cancer?" in the German newspaper Bild, “the nutrient solution for the vaccine consists of cancerous cells from animals,” and according to Wodarg, "we do not know if there could be an allergic reaction.”

Johannes Löwer, the president of the German government’s Paul Ehrlich Institute, also warned that the side effects of the shot could be worse than the actual swine flu, according to the article.

Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative that will also be used in the swine flu vaccine, has come under fire from a broad array of medical experts. Despite a number of studies that concluded the substance does not cause autism, there are critics of the various studies. Also critics point to widespread concern about other mercury-related complications.

The Food and Drug Administration actually told pharmaceutical companies to stop using the substance in early childhood vaccines. But many still contain it. And the swine flu vaccine will be no exception, though Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, said that because of concerns over the preservative, there will be some vaccines available without it.

Critics, however, are still not satisfied. "We don't have adequate safety studies on this vaccine before we are moving forward to market," noted Lyn Redwood, the president of a non-profit organization called SafeMinds (Sensible Action For Ending Mercury-Induced Neurological Disorders) dedicated to investigating and raising awareness about the risks associated with mercury in medicinal products. "I'm really not convinced that we know for sure that the risk of the disease outweighs the risk of the vaccine, especially since this is a brand new additive that we have never used before in combination with thimerosal."

But thimerosal, squalene, and cancerous animal cells are far from the only concerns. Among other potentially dangerous chemicals and substances often found in influenza vaccines are formaldehyde, antibiotics, and even ethylene glycol, known as anti-freeze. Various health experts have varying opinions about the effects of all of these additives, but many doctors still warn against them.

Another cause for concern surfaced in the United Kingdom when the government’s Health Protection Agency sent a letter to senior neurologists warning that the new swine flu vaccine is linked to the deadly nerve disease known as Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), the Daily Mail reported in an article entitled "Swine flu jab link to killer nerve disease: Leaked letter reveals concern of neurologists over 25 deaths in America." The risk of contracting the paralysis-inducing illness was reportedly eight times greater in those who received the infamous government swine flu vaccine of 1976, which killed more people than the actual virus. The leaked letter warned recipients to keep an eye open for GBS and report it immediately.

Many vaccine opponents go much further than highlighting the potential risks, with some making unsubstantiated claims that it will be used as a tool for mass depopulation or eugenics. Some point to anecdotal evidence like comments by Obama’s science czar, who called for drastic population reduction methods in a book called Ecoscience. But what is certain is that the vaccine carries risks — a lot of them according to experts.

The people who seem totally convinced about the inoculations’ safety and efficacy — or who are at least downplaying the potential risks and side effects — appear to be mostly government bureaucrats or people with vested interests. Virtually every medicinal product carries some risk, and these vaccines are no different. To say otherwise is disingenuous.

What is important is that the population be educated about the potential complications and then decide with their families and healthcare providers what approach they would like to take, taking into consideration the risks of the vaccine and of the swine flu. It should be an individual decision without bureaucratic interference or propaganda.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adjuvant; experiment; flu; h1n1; influenza; mercola; sourcetitlenoturl; squalene; swin; swineflu; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Sometimes the "cure" is more of a risk.
1 posted on 09/03/2009 10:17:06 PM PDT by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

ping


2 posted on 09/03/2009 10:18:29 PM PDT by dit_xi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Count me out!


3 posted on 09/03/2009 10:19:08 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

mark


4 posted on 09/03/2009 10:21:06 PM PDT by varina davis (Life is not a dress rehearsal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead
Count me out!

Me too. I've never understood why people get flu shots.

5 posted on 09/03/2009 10:22:11 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

The entire purpose of an adjuvant is to create an immune response. It does this because your body assumes, correctly, that it is harmful. The risks should be weighed of course but this influenza A is simply not that deadly at this point. IMO of course. Squalene is used to induce arthritis in small mammal studies BTW.


6 posted on 09/03/2009 10:26:13 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

I’m not worried about the swine flue. I figure I and my family have been exposed over and over again since I travel so much. I just don’t understand the hype around this. I understood it when it appeared there is a risk it could manifest differently than the normal flu but it does not appear to be the case at. Most people appear to have been immune or have developed immunity quickly with the vast bulk of cases being very mild to the point of no being noticed. Also for those worry-worts out there if you fly on a plane, you have probably been exposed, if you’ve went to an amusement park or traveled significantly then you have probably been exposed when means you already have immunity.

This thing is being rushed way too quickly and there is no real justification for it. It reminds me of episodes from the Xfiles. Why the rush?


7 posted on 09/03/2009 10:28:10 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Party like it is 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

For what it’s worth, from WIKI: All higher organisms produce squalene, including humans. It is a hydrocarbon and a triterpene. Squalene is a natural and vital part of the synthesis of cholesterol, steroid hormones, and vitamin D in the human body [1]


8 posted on 09/03/2009 10:35:08 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Coming to America- All the Culture, Glory and Beauty of Zimbabwe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Yeah and it was used in the Anthrax vaccine. Our military were the guinea pigs and there were documented adverse reactions. I’m not anti-vaccine, I had my shots as a kid and my kids have had theirs without a problem but I do not like this rushing around setting the stage for vaccination with what are experimental vaccines with a known autoimmune antagonist. This could lead to millions of children and others with chronic autoimmune diseases.

“What Squalene Does to Rats

Oil-based vaccination adjuvants like squalene have been proved to generate concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of time.[vi]

A 2000 study published in the American Journal of Pathology demonstrated a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,” also known as rheumatoid arthritis.[vii]

The researchers concluded the study raised questions about the role of adjuvants in chronic inflammatory diseases.”


9 posted on 09/03/2009 10:36:11 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Party like it is 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
I watched a press conference on youtube a few weeks back and the officials weren't even narrowing down squalene. The term was ‘experimental adjuvants’, plural, in regards to these swine flu vaccines. Also plural. No description or allusion to what the other chemicals might be. I'm not anti vaccine either. My kids have had their shots as well, but I agree this rushed hysteria is wrong.
10 posted on 09/03/2009 10:48:17 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
>>Yeah and it was used in the Anthrax vaccine.
 
Correct.

Vaccine A tells a story of betrayal, of medical arrogance flourishing in the absence of public accountability, shielded by an unquestioning deference to national security. Investigative journalist Gary Matsumoto reveals that thousands of young men and women in the U.S. Armed Forces were subjected to medical experiments that were conducted without their knowledge or consent-and that have put them in grave danger. Not only have military scientists performed unethical experiments on U.S. and British soldiers; not only are they refusing to admit either the experiments or the effects they caused; not only are they continuing to use a deadly substance in experimental vaccines-this substance is being developed for use in vaccines intended for mass immunization around the globe. In an alarming narrative, Vaccine A recounts this scientific tragedy-from the U.S. Army's tradition of medical experimentation on soldiers through to the present, where the consequences of these experimental vaccines, if administered to civilians, will be unimaginably devastating.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/046504400X
 
Preview on Google Books:


11 posted on 09/03/2009 10:52:56 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanChick

ping


12 posted on 09/03/2009 11:02:12 PM PDT by kara2008 (The Answer to 1984 is 1776 - Restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Most importantly, a 2006 law gives complete immunity to the pharmaceutical companies for the use of these vaccines under the conditions of “medical emergency” that has been declared for the H1N1/variants.

That’s why it’s being rushed - the “emergency” is used not only to force mass innoculations, but also to invoke the legal immunity law for the vaccine makers.

Which means, of course, that there is zero money put into safety testing. After all, what’s the point if they can’t be sued? Instead, the results of the mass inocculations will BE the “safety testing.”


13 posted on 09/04/2009 12:17:10 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Maelstorm

The sickest I’ve been with a virus was after I had taken the only flu shot I’ve ever taken. I’ll never do it again.


15 posted on 09/04/2009 12:35:15 AM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Autoimmune pancreatitis seems to be a side effect.


16 posted on 09/04/2009 2:00:40 AM PDT by x_plus_one (In Chicago, the dead vote twice, in St. Louis they get elected. Require A Picture ID for voting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

I am not taking it. I’ll take that risk.


17 posted on 09/04/2009 2:58:58 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raygun; Admin Moderator

Your bizarre personal abuse of another Freeper has been reported.


18 posted on 09/04/2009 4:45:48 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
I'm not anti vaccine, I'm anti Flu Vaccine.
I got two Flu Shots in my life. Both times I got sick.

So if the goobermint is going to make these H1NI shots 'mandatory', and under threat of detention and relocation, they better recall the 101st and 82nd Airborne Divisions from Afghanistan first 'cause I AIN'T gettin' one.

19 posted on 09/04/2009 5:15:44 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Every time I post that I got sick for a month after each of my two flu shots, FReepers tell me I’m nuts.

My husband, my children and myself will skip the shots.

We did the baby shots, but that’s it.


20 posted on 09/04/2009 6:12:50 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson