Skip to comments.
Stop this creepy trend
Lincoln JournalStar ^
| 8/24/09
| Lincoln JournalStar Editorial
Posted on 08/25/2009 10:47:09 AM PDT by RepRivFarm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: MrB
They need the reminder - there is an ultimate (earthly) authority in this country, and its not the federal government, its not the supreme court, its the people.
This point, more than anything else, is most likely the REAL cause for the complaint.
To: RepRivFarm
Why does the appearance of a piece of metal strike such fear and revulsion in some folks? I just don't get it....these are my fellow Nebraskans!
It's quite common for uncivilized tribesmen to believe simple items are possessed of magical power. It's childish superstition, but maybe they fear those pieces of metal will somehow render their herds sterile or steal their souls.
22
posted on
08/25/2009 11:03:10 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
To: netmilsmom
You can bet the founders attended political rallies...with muskets in hand. Go blow wind, Mr. Smarty-Pants Newsman.
23
posted on
08/25/2009 11:03:50 AM PDT
by
50sDad
(The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
To: All
You forget, the constitution is suspended when it comes to Obama.
24
posted on
08/25/2009 11:04:17 AM PDT
by
faucetman
(Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
To: pissant
The correct term according to Miss Marple’s Rules of Ettiquette is “poofter”, my dear friend.......(hee hee).....
25
posted on
08/25/2009 11:04:18 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: RepRivFarm
The guy who wrote this article isn’t a fellow Nebraskan.
Or he wouldn’t think it was creepy.
There’s a whole lot of security people with guns around the President all the time.
Who says somebody couldn’t slip in there who shouldn’t be there.
To: crusty old prospector
No one else would use the term creepy.That's true. Besides, it's not creepy at all. In fact,...it's downright REVOLUTIONARY!! ...I love it!
To: RepRivFarm
This will not be popular here but ... Just because you have the right to do something doesnt mean it is the right thing to do.
Some people are taking showing up at rallies with guns to be a form of intimidation. Maybe they are over-reacting or taking it in a way that is not intended, but responsible gun owners dont use their guns for intimidation.
Consider: If union folks showed up with clubs and tire irons at a protest event, and joked about beating up ‘scabs’, would you feel threatened? I think the liberals are seeing these shows of guns in the same way and liars like MSNBC are playing up those fears. We shouldnt give them excuses or video clips that let them do that and tarnish the legitimate and peaceful protests and rallies.
28
posted on
08/25/2009 11:09:35 AM PDT
by
WOSG
(OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
To: TexasFreeper2009
I really don't want to live in a world with every street, school and park not named for MLK being renamed for the zero. Well, we would still know where crack is for sale.
29
posted on
08/25/2009 11:09:54 AM PDT
by
Eaker
(If you have a problem and If explosives are an option then explosives are THE answer.)
To: RepRivFarm
Liberal columnist E.J. Dionne asked a provocative question: "Try a thought experiment: What would conservatives have said if a group of loud, scruffy leftists had brought guns to the public events of Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush?" There's no doubt in our minds that conservatives would have been upset, perhaps outraged. Proof that the writer is either a flagrant liar or has not the most tenuous grasp on reality.
BTW, since when does Brooks Brothers count as "scruffy"?
30
posted on
08/25/2009 11:12:07 AM PDT
by
Sloth
(Irony: Freepers who call Ron Paul a "nut" but swallow all the birth certificate conspiracy crap.)
To: so_real
“If someone doesn’t feel safe around law abiding citizens who happen to be armed, it may just be because that person is not a law abiding citizen himself.”
I too feel safe/comfortable.
But to a liberal, a gun-owning, bible-thumping, freedom-loving redblooded American patriot is an alien, one of the ‘others’.
We see Sam Adams ... they see Tim Mcveigh.
Go figure.
31
posted on
08/25/2009 11:12:15 AM PDT
by
WOSG
(OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
To: RepRivFarm
Is this a high school paper?
To: WOSG
The union pukes carry clubs because they cannot legally carry guns due to all of their felony convictions.
33
posted on
08/25/2009 11:16:46 AM PDT
by
Eaker
(If you have a problem and If explosives are an option then explosives are THE answer.)
To: Eaker
“The union pukes carry clubs because they cannot legally carry guns due to all of their felony convictions.”
LOL.
34
posted on
08/25/2009 11:17:31 AM PDT
by
WOSG
(OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
To: Sloth
“Liberals” can’t be trusted with guns,
because they are inherently immature.
They project this on others, and think
that no one should be trusted with guns.
35
posted on
08/25/2009 11:18:25 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: RepRivFarm
Any public official that is afraid of being surrounded by armed constituents is a public official that the constituents should be afraid of.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
36
posted on
08/25/2009 11:19:42 AM PDT
by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: RepRivFarm
If you are the type of person that the mere sight of a gun freaks you out, seek professional help and meanwhile, stay home.
37
posted on
08/25/2009 11:28:45 AM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: RepRivFarm
Liberal columnist E.J. Dionne asked a provocative question: "Try a thought experiment: What would conservatives have said if a group of loud, scruffy leftists had brought guns to the public events of Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush?" There's no doubt in our minds that conservatives would have been upset, perhaps outraged.
Not a shred of doubt in your minds makes it true? As opposed to.....asking conservatives? Oh yeah, truth and all. Smarmy little cowards. Had they said "Republicans" on the other hand, I might believe it.
To: WOSG
Consider: If union folks showed up with clubs and tire irons at a protest event, and joked about beating up scabs, would you feel threatened? Not if I had a firearm with me.
39
posted on
08/25/2009 11:31:18 AM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: a fool in paradise
and how does that dilute the solid Constitutional stance made by these guys ???
40
posted on
08/25/2009 11:34:58 AM PDT
by
Gilbo_3
(Luke 22:36...Trust in the Lord...=...LiveFReeOr Die...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson