So the guy shot someone breaking into his house, and that’s a bad thing?
Considering Senator Soles’ estranged relationship with the truth there must be some doubts about the facts in the case. Maybe he invited a couple yutes over for some booze and weed and when he tried to grope them they resisted.
If that is all it was.. but, it sounds like there is more to this story...keep reading the comments.
It’s only a “bad thing” in this case because the Shooter belongs to a Political Party would take away your Right to do the same if needed.
If you’re a Democrat, what’s good for the Goose is not necessarily good for the Gander.
He ‘acted badly’ and will have to have a beer with bammy, and the guy he shot. The guy he shot will be wheeled in on a gurney, with wall to wall coverage from PMSNBC. Wonder what the race of the intruders was, and if black, that beer will happen within 1 week.
There will be no mention of the D status, but lots of mention of the nasty Republican position on gun toting, and clinging to guns.
We should be doing our civic duty in such an economy, and allow intruders their ‘fair share’ of our possessions.
Don't you know the credo? “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.” That has quite a ring to it, where is it from?
When a gun-grabber who advocates taking away your right to keep and bear arms insists on exercising his own right to keep and bear arms by shooting an intruder, it is a good thing that an intruder was shot (if in fact that was the case) but it does show a bit of hypocrisy. (See Carl T Rowan as another example)
He SAYS they were trying to break into his house. We'll see.