Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clorox: "Decision not to advertise on political talk shows" (Boycott = FAIL)
DefendGlenn.com ^ | 08-20-2009 | DefendGlenn.com

Posted on 08/20/2009 3:18:08 PM PDT by montag813

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: grey_whiskers

Yeah, got them wrong but thanks!


41 posted on 08/20/2009 5:20:09 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Sodium hydroxide is Clorox

Clorox's active ingredient sodium hypochlorite.

42 posted on 08/20/2009 5:31:52 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
According to the Material Safety Data Sheet, the main active ingredient of Clorox is sodium hypochlorite (which supplies the clorine), but it does contain a tiny percentage of sodium hydroxide.
43 posted on 08/20/2009 5:35:46 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Thanks! Several FreePers have mentioned that ... the hydroxide for some reason popped into my brainbox .....


44 posted on 08/20/2009 5:42:06 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: IceAge

You know what also good

Walgreens essential cleaning products they are good


45 posted on 08/20/2009 7:27:56 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob
Were had Beck been all week?

I think a moose bit his sister.

46 posted on 08/20/2009 7:39:32 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I never thought I would do this; but I am actually looking to see if any of these advertisers are on the products I buy. If they are; I don’t buy them.


47 posted on 08/21/2009 12:38:30 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I used to participate in boycotts but stopped. I finally figured out that since crap always rolls downhill that all I was doing was hurting the regular person like me when the company had to cut back due to low sales.

I work for one of those companies that are being boycotted and the end result is that people like me are the ones that end up getting hurt. My employer treats us good and we make a good wage but we also have NO say in the decisions regarding advertising and marketing.

I don’t bite the hand that feeds me regardless of how I feel about some of the decisions they make. I can’t see putting regular Americans out of work by boycotting the products they make. There are a lot of good conservatives like me that depend on jobs these companies provide.


48 posted on 08/21/2009 2:23:31 AM PDT by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Yup, did so much of it it’s a verb in many circles (”I totally McGyvered that”). Great show. And some of his things, not many but some, actually work in the real world.


49 posted on 08/21/2009 8:22:53 AM PDT by discostu (Somehow mister reliable was not where he was supposed to be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I’m not dithering, I just realized most of the places I was boycotting weren’t missing my money nearly as much as I was missing their products. I’m not sure lying to a company and saying I’m boycotting them when I’m not is really a path towards a more moral country.


50 posted on 08/21/2009 8:24:30 AM PDT by discostu (Somehow mister reliable was not where he was supposed to be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer; dighton; aculeus; general_re; L,TOWM; Constitution Day; hellinahandcart
"So freedom of speech is wanted to be directed by advertisers?"

Well, I'm old enough to remember the old .. old .. shows, like Dinah Shore, Dean Martin, Jack Benny, The Honeymooners, and George Burns, and they all had either just one sponsor or one major sponsor and a couple of minor ones who sponsored that particular show.

I'm sure that the sponsors, in those days, had a significant say in what appeared on shows bearing their brand name. And, in my opinion, the shows were better for it. Just like the days when the studios "owned" the movie stars and kept a tight rein on them to prevent a backlash by the public for something they said or did.

Darn kids ... stay off my lawn ... [/old man mode]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


RESISTOR

Swear allegiance to the flag, whatever flag they offer;
Never hint at what you really feel.
Teach the children quietly for, someday, sons and daughters
Will rise up and fight while we stood still.

Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmändø (EMØØK)

51 posted on 08/21/2009 8:28:30 AM PDT by BlueLancer (I'm getting a fine tootsy-frootsying right here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Your boycott "morals" and 15 cents will get you a ticket to Obama's second Inaugural Ball.

Leni

52 posted on 08/21/2009 8:37:50 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend on You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Yeah but I can look myself in the mirror every morning.


53 posted on 08/21/2009 8:38:38 AM PDT by discostu (Somehow mister reliable was not where he was supposed to be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

Ya, true. I remember seeing a DVD on The Smother’s Brothers and how they had to submit their stuff to the CBS head to make sure it wouldn’t upset the sponsors .... then too, here in Seattle I remember reading where Nordstrom pulled their ads from the Seattle Times because of some editorial they didn’t like ....


54 posted on 08/21/2009 1:03:13 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Clorox has been one of the best stocks I have ever owned.
Great name brand and excellent management.
55 posted on 08/21/2009 4:38:24 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: montag813

This is pretty significant, when you consider they’ll be pulling GreenWorks advertising off liberal talk shows also.

And, Clorox brand loyalty is about as strong as it gets, deservedly so, and I doubt any amount of ‘shuffling’ will hurt.


56 posted on 08/25/2009 9:46:25 AM PDT by davidlachnicht ("IF WE ARE ALL TO BE TARGETS, THEN WE ALL MUST BE SOLDIERS.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson