Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah’s Ghoulish Carousel [MoDo is lying... slap her down in their comments section]
NYTimes ^ | August 15 2009 | MAUREEN DOWD

Posted on 08/15/2009 8:21:17 PM PDT by bahblahbah

I’m not sure the man who popped off and tweeted that Sonia Sotomayor was a “Latina woman racist” is the best Henry Higgins for the Eliza Doolittle of Alaska.

But Newt Gingrich was a professor. And he does know something about pulling yourself up by dragging down others and imploding when you take center stage — both Palin specialties.

Besides, he agrees with Sarah — who fretted that her parents and son Trig might be in danger from Obama “death panels” — that we should be very wary about trusting government with end-of-life decisions.

So Newt took it upon himself to become Palin’s Pygmalion. He told Politico that the out-of-work pol should write a book; take a commentator gig on TV; get a condo in D.C. or New York to use as an East Coast base; and prepare three types of speeches — one “to make money,” another to “project her brand” before universities and interest groups, and a vivid campaign stump speech to use for Republican candidates in 2010.

Most important, he advised, the dizzy Palin has to be “clear in her own head what she wants to do.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dowdy; drunk; dustywomb; modo; palin; scotchwhiskey; spinster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: bahblahbah

Take the Heroin needle out of your arm Maureen Shroud!


41 posted on 08/16/2009 3:50:24 AM PDT by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freethinker_for_freedom
"I don’t quite understand the argument that Section 1233 of HR 3200 is an attempt to coerce seniors into ending their lives by offering free counseling about end of life decisions."

Because it's the start of the slippery slope to euthanasia. To see the progression, study up on what has already happened in the Netherlands, Great Britain, and Oregon. The progression is from "voluntary" to "mandatory".

42 posted on 08/16/2009 3:52:52 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Not to mention a giant impersonal federal government has no business getting involved in counseling about such issues as these issues do not rise to the federal level, not even as matters of a grossly abused “interstate commerce” clause. Health care itself shouldn’t be a federal issue.


43 posted on 08/16/2009 4:01:01 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

MoDo is still completely offensive and off base about Palin, but even while she twists the facts and hurls more insults at her, the fact of Palin’s success and significance comes through.

Palin is finally free enough to be too influential and formidable for a shrew like Dowd to misrepresent her with any credibility.


44 posted on 08/16/2009 4:12:14 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

Maureen, I hate to break this to you, but you might not be the best person to lecture Sarah Palin for being superficial, intellectually lightweight and fast and loose with the truth.


45 posted on 08/16/2009 4:39:24 AM PDT by RichInOC ("...and the Oscar goes to...Catherine."--Sir Sean Connery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
"Health care itself shouldn’t be a federal issue."

Actually, there IS one aspect of healthcare that IS a "federal issue", and it directly relates to the "interstate commerce" clause. Namely, that any consumer should be able to "shop" for health insurance from any source, rather than just the ones in his state of residence.

46 posted on 08/16/2009 5:21:47 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
"Maureen, I hate to break this to you, but you might not be the best person to lecture Sarah Palin for being superficial, intellectually lightweight and fast and loose with the truth."

Good shot!! Bullseye!!

47 posted on 08/16/2009 5:23:19 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
Dowd doesn't realize how clearly her female jealousy shows.

She's a woman who can't stand the spotlight shining on another woman.

48 posted on 08/16/2009 6:08:28 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

“BTW, nice job regurgitating Obama’s “arguments”

I was regurgitating Palin’s argument, in case you didn’t notice. She said that people would be coerced into end of life planning by their doctors, who would talk the unwilling into it because they could make a fee. I said if Palin thinks doctors are so easily corrupted by the prospect of an extra fee, then we need to rethink the way medical treatment is paid. Now where did Obama say that?

“If (as you assert with no links to proof) health care bills go down where doctors are on salary, this would most likely be due to the fact that they’re not personally responsible for liability insurance premiums and thus order fewer unnecessary tests as a defense against ambulance chasers.”

I don’t know about you, but when my wife brings the car to a shop “because it’s making a funny noise” I end up with a much bigger repair bill than when I take care of things. Never have that happen? But then, I guess you believe that car repairmen are a worthless lot, and doctors would never think of material gain. Is that it? I don’t know about you, but I live on the planet earth, and everywhere I’ve been when you give someone a blank check, you end up paying more. Why do you think it is different with medical care?


49 posted on 08/16/2009 6:28:56 AM PDT by freethinker_for_freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
Newt will never run for president. He doesn't have the money, clout, base, charisma.

He always keeps his name in the mix of presidential candidate possibilities. But that's only to keep his name in the public mind so he can garner well-paying TV stints and appearances.....and get lucrative speaker fees at political and corporate functions.

Here and there, he deliberately throws into the public arena some outrageous statements guaranteed to raise eyebrows and hackles. This calls more attention to himself and guarantees more bookings.....especially if he pops off about a fellow Republican.

Always follow the momey trail with Newt. It's enormously hard work keeping in the public eye to make a living after you've been a D.C. big shot.....and he works very hard at it. It's his personal business and income survival now, folks. Keep this in mind when you hear him opine.

Leni

50 posted on 08/16/2009 6:32:34 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend on You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freethinker_for_freedom
Now where did Obama say that?

I guess you were asleep during his "unnecessary tonsillectomies and amputations" canard.

I don’t know about you, but I live on the planet earth, and everywhere I’ve been when you give someone a blank check,...

Nice try. You are, of course, completely ignoring the point about doctors' being forced to practice defensive medicine because of the ambulance chasers.

51 posted on 08/16/2009 6:37:59 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
The New York Times has fallen far indeed when this type of silliness is tolerated in a guest column, much less actually paid for by the newspaper.

And they wonder why they sell fewer newspapers and attract fewer advertisers?

52 posted on 08/16/2009 6:53:01 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

“I guess you were asleep during his “unnecessary tonsillectomies and amputations” canard.”

Yes, my usual reaction when Obama appears is to fall asleep immediately. Purely defensive. If I actually listen to him, I usually have to make a quick run to the toilet.

“You are, of course, completely ignoring the point about doctors’ being forced to practice defensive medicine because of the ambulance chasers.”

No, I’m just trying to make a different point, which is totally ignored. Sure, some of our excessive treatments are a result of real fears doctors have of being sued in a medical malpractice suit, but the fact that they make more money the more treatment they order also comes into play. For instance, many orthopedists in my hometown have their own physical therapy clinics and MRI and CAT scan machines. And outside physical therapy clinics pay a “doctor supervision” fee to the referring doctor for each treatment that his patient receives. A more polite way of saying a “kickback.” We know that people in all walks of life are susceptible to having their behavior changed by giving them extra money. Why do you think doctors are different?

Sarah Palin was making the same point, that doctors would be susceptible to the extra fee for end of life counseling and would thereby recommend it to their patients. Are you disagreeing with her?


53 posted on 08/16/2009 7:09:33 AM PDT by freethinker_for_freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

“Because it’s the start of the slippery slope to euthanasia. To see the progression, study up on what has already happened in the Netherlands, Great Britain, and Oregon. The progression is from “voluntary” to “mandatory”

Okay, I’ll try to get round to it. In the meantime, could you give me a hint—does Oregon already have mandatory euthanasia?


54 posted on 08/16/2009 7:17:36 AM PDT by freethinker_for_freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: freethinker_for_freedom
Okay, I’ll try to get round to it. In the meantime, could you give me a hint—does Oregon already have mandatory euthanasia?"

Late Oregon incident. Woman with cancer. State insurance refused to pay for any treatment, but offered to pay for her "death with dignity" suicide pills. Comes pretty close to mandatory to me.

55 posted on 08/16/2009 8:13:32 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: freethinker_for_freedom
For instance, many orthopedists in my hometown have their own physical therapy clinics and MRI and CAT scan machines.

So what? Sounds like a good business decision to me. They've got to make those huge malpractice insurance premiums anyway, so they increase their bottom line by performing services they'd otherwise farm out.

And outside physical therapy clinics pay a “doctor supervision” fee to the referring doctor for each treatment that his patient receives. A more polite way of saying a “kickback.”

Ooh, how scary. A doctor is actually paid to monitor the physical therapy. You'd probably do it for nothing, right?

Are you disagreeing with her?

I'm not an Obamabot, so naturally that doesn't stop me in my tracks. I admire Sarah, but I don't worship and adore her every utterance.

56 posted on 08/16/2009 8:36:51 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Agreed.


57 posted on 08/16/2009 9:17:21 AM PDT by freethinker_for_freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

“Ooh, how scary. A doctor is actually paid to monitor the physical therapy. You’d probably do it for nothing, right?”

Seeing as how the doctor doesn’t actually do any monitoring, I think I would.


58 posted on 08/17/2009 10:38:39 AM PDT by freethinker_for_freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson