Posted on 08/08/2009 6:38:12 AM PDT by kellynla
The Army National Guard is now recruiting individuals to fill job positions described as an internment/resettlement specialist according to job postings on Monster.Com and other employment based Internet sites such as one listed here. In other words, they are recruiting individuals to man facilities that could be used to house political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals that the government doesnt like. The term resettlement indicates that individuals holding this job position could also be responsible for moving people to other locations against their will. It is a documented fact that the U.S. government has numerous facilities at their disposal that could easily be used to house large numbers of people. Combine that, with this new job posting by the Army National Guard, and it seems as if the U.S. government is continuing to prepare for an eventual popular uprising.
Lets look at some of the evidence we have of the U.S. governments intentions to establish the infrastructure that could be used to house large numbers of political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals the U.S. government wants locked up.
HR 645 the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act is a proposed bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would authorize FEMA to build no less than six National Emergency Centers throughout the U.S. on closed or open military facilities. These facilities are to be designed to house large numbers of people. Why would emergency centers need to be built on closed or open military facilities unless there was a need to keep people from coming in and out of them?
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
You will have to take that up with the National Guard, for whom you have so much scorn. You will have to take that up with the National Guard, for whom you have so much scorn.
There are grisly pics here be warned!
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/WACO/waco.html
But the 1787 constitutional accommodation of slavery, I take it, should be? Or not?
You’re the one who claimed tha National Guard “would never do this”. If the National Guard would violate the Constitution on the orders of a local mayor why would you believe they would not violate the Constitution on orders from the President?
I would like to hear your reasoning in coming to that conclusion.
I said the National Guard would not round up law-abiding citizens and put them in internment camps. I guess I have a higher opinion of National Guard troops than you do.
True, but if the Islamists ever lit-off a dirty bomb (or worse) here, he might "side with Islam" by interning his Muslims buddies... to prevent them from being cut to ribbons by livid Americans.
If you look at the way the federal government holds annual multi-agency field exercises (usually scripted as natural disasters and related emergency response operations), it's pretty obvious that they're also preparing for the Muslim terrorists' SOP: multiple simultaneous attacks.
If they would break into law-abiding citizens’ homes and confiscate their lawfully owned firearms on orders from a local mayor, on what do you base your belief that they would not round up and inter citizens for no other reason than the President said were a national risk and ordered it?
You’re quick with the non-sequitur.
“No apologies. But a book recommendation:... “
Oh, come now! That’s not how the game’s played here. You’re hiding the ball.
Try to be a bit more forthcoming in defense of your statement. I suggest you’re much better than that. :-)
Citing a whole damned book in support of a position would get a rather extended and pregnant silence in most college classrooms. Simply because Lincoln abused the rights of citizens, does not mean there was justification in the Constitution for such actions, or that such abuses should be used as justification for such shenanigans by future governments. That’s why the government is based on the Constitution. It is also why rights of the citizenry are not derived from government (though many pols would have us believe otherwise).
You cited FP #10 in defense of Japanese-American internment (using #10 as a justification for your statement rather stretches that work beyond recognition, IMHO)but if you don’t want to play I can understand.
“Fake ad IMO”
Let us all know what it is about this ad that you “think” is “fake”...
http://www.nationalguard.com/careers/mos/description.php?mos_code=31E
It is interesting that this URL has been blocked by the site owner and all traces of this story have been scrubbed from the net. It was a well known story a few years ago on FR.
I remember that. The NRA sued and I believe won a judgement. As I remember, the court ordered the guns returned, not that they were needed after the fact.
I remember seeing on the local news a big CHP officer body slamming a little old grandma to the floor because she produced her little pistol to show them she had “protection, food and water and dogfood and wanted to stay in her home.”
I was embarrased for a moment to be a Californian. What the CHP was doing there I don’t know?
Have you tried www.archive.org ? Just asking, as it can find lots of stuff that has been “lost to the ages”.
I think that is the site that gave me the “site blocked by owner” page. Kind of strange when the Way Back Machine gets stumped.
It is usually pretty good about such things. I also wonder who and what can have stuff scrubbed from its volumes. Pretty good resource for something that started out using castoff surplus equipment.
The “I’m gonna need a bigger roll of tin foil” ping.
I wonder that too. Some is self-scrubbed. I found about a hundred-fold more hits on Yahoo search than I did on Google.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.