Obama will eventually be forced to show his original birth certificate because of all the liberal forgeries floating around the internet!
Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
Listen to that interview more carefully. It is obvious that Mr. Bomford didn't have his original copy of that web image to compare the critical details. He merely compared the basic facts about himself from his own memory to those on the image (which do match the data on the image), not the inserted document numbers or clerk's name (which were inserted by the forgers into image of his BC).
I’ve been here longer than both of you. Not sure of your point there.
Okay, fair enough. Then, in the mother's section, look at the "e" in Brisbane. You will find similar scrunching, there, compared to the other "e's."
I think it is only fitting that 0bama hold a 5 minute news conference to announce he will unseal his Birth cert in Hawaii and disprove his Kenya birth certificate; tomorrow for his birthday.
I should say, the ones he has listed in this post, the first one is a K and the second one is an E, however, the one on Orly’s site is also an E, not a K.
Obama will eventually be forced to show his original birth certificate because of all the liberal forgeries floating around the internet!
“I am from Adelaide, the home of the Bomford certificate. Its real. And to prove it, heres an interview with David Bomford on ABC Radio Adelaide”
“mikizee
Since Aug 4, 2009”
signing up to FR today to let us know?
Sorry, got my dates wrong.
Still looks like an E to me.
And I know it was a coin, I’m not that big of an idiot. It was just an example of the South Australia coat of arms.
I believe you’re mistaken on what “Divide Scanned Photos” actually does. Edited or non-edited doesn’t matter - it just divides up an image into chunks using fuzzy logic assuming certain borders are the edges of scanned photos. It allows a person to scan a whole bunch of pictures at once in one shot, import that large graphic into Photoshop, and then hit that button to divide all of the pictures up into separate layers or temp files.
I believe you’re mistaken on what “Divide Scanned Photos” actually does. Edited or non-edited doesn’t matter - it just divides up an image into chunks using fuzzy logic assuming certain borders are the edges of scanned photos. It allows a person to scan a whole bunch of pictures at once in one shot, import that large graphic into Photoshop, and then hit that button to divide all of the pictures up into separate layers or temp files.
I've locked horns with T.E. on several occasions. Felt much the same as you, but never called him/her out.
The owner of the birth certificate says it was real. ::shrugs:: Don’t know.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm
Adelaide man caught up in bid to oust Obama
Yes, after reading that interview, I realize all he says is “That looks like the ‘old style’.
He even admits to not knowing what his own birth certificate looks like, so what he is saying is “it SEEMS real enough”.
Welcome to FR bookmark.
>>>It is obvious that Mr. Bomford didn’t have his original copy of that web image to compare the critical details.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm
Excerpt:
DINA ROSENDORFF: Looking over the documents in question Mr Bomford still can’t quite believe his eyes.
DAVID JEFFREY BOMFORD: It’s little old me and my mum and everything else up there. Oh I definitely confirm that the birth certificate was mine. That was quite easy to see - my address, even the style of the birth certificate was an old South Australian one.
So it’s quite easy to identify that it’s mine.
DINA ROSENDORFF: And looking at the fake Kenyan birth certificate what do you make of it?
DAVID JEFFREY BOMFORD: It’s definitely a copy of my certificate. It’s so laughable it’s ridiculous.
Am I on the paranoid side of things? This David Bombard works as a public servant? In a government office?
Listen to that interview more carefully. The old chap didn't have his original copy to compare and was merely comparing general facts about himself with those on the web image. He didn't compare the incriminating details (document numbers & clerk names) which were inserted by the forgers into the image of his BC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.