Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul attacks Sarah Palin as 'country club' Republican
American Thinker ^ | 7/18/2009 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 07/19/2009 9:32:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-285 next last
To: BlackElk

You are good at getting something out of someone’s words that was not there.

Did I reveal who I voted for in 2008? No. I said the country rejected neo-con ideology, which it did.

Did I say I was “anti-war”? No. I said we need to shift our foriegn policy to that of a non-interventionist (not “isolationist”).

Your remarks about the constitution are not very clear, but I think you are saying the Constitution is a relic, or posibly that it is combersome to the progressive world? Could you clear that up? Thanks :D

Oh, and I just love war! Every man who has ever fought in a war will tell you the same thing too. We all just loved it...sheesh What kind of a...ah nevermind

Have fun at your meeting.


221 posted on 07/20/2009 4:11:45 PM PDT by camp_steveo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

Why are you not trumpeting Duncan Hunter or some other solidly conservative candidate who would make a better president than Palin? Is it Palin’s name recognition?


222 posted on 07/20/2009 4:36:07 PM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: dcgst4
He didn’t say Sarah was the Country Club type, he said her supporters mostly were.

Yes, the title of this thread and the article is a flat-out lie. "The American Thinker" and Politico seemed to have double-teamed to run interference on behalf of the Federal Reserve. The media falsehood is easy to detect and yet Paul detractors bought it hook, line, and sinker.

At the bottom of a wide-ranging interview, Politico reports:

Politico article: As for soon-to-be departing Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, Paul dismisses her supporters as "more establishment, conventional Country-Club type of Republicans.”

"I wonder whether she's energizing the 15-20 year olds," Paul muses. "That would be a question I would have. Because she doesn't talk about the Federal Reserve and some of these issues. She doesn't talk too much about personal liberties, civil liberties, getting rid of drug laws, attacking the war on drugs, punishing people who torture."

Notice the headliner about "Country-Club type of Republicans" is not even quoted as a full sentence. That is highly suspicious.

Palin and Paul are natural allies so it should be no surprise that the media tries to drive a wedge between them. If Palin joins in supporting Ron Paul's campaign to audit the Fed, we suddenly have the cultural-populist/libertarian/blue-dog alliance necessary for a conservative prairie fire.

223 posted on 07/20/2009 4:40:15 PM PDT by Kells (Andrew Jackson was the only President to pay off the National Debt. His Epitaph: "I Killed the Bank")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished
Only Palin cheerleaders are independent thinkers.

At this point, supporting Palin runs contrary to both conventional thinking and the status quo, so yes.

I stand by everything I’ve posted. In my opinion Palin lacks a lot of substance and I’ll support Romney or almost any other potential primary candidate over her.

So you stand by your claim that you only supported Romney because you thought he was the best candidate in the '08 primaries, yet you contradict yourself by claiming (well, more like admitting) that you continue to support him now. Okay. Glad we've cleared your dishonesty up.

The only reason Palin is as strong a candidate as she is (I think inherently weak because she has very little intellectual depth), is the novelty of McCain choosing her as a VP candidate.

Yes, we already know that you think she's an idiot. Do you have anything new to add? I find it interesting that you criticize her supposed idiocy first and foremost. You don't take issue with her pro-life stance (at least not publicly: privately I'm sure you're fuming about it), her energy policy, her support of federalism (which shouldn't even be an issue: thanks, Comrade Obama!), or her calls for reduced federal spending and taxes. You don't talk about her unknowns, namely her stance on illegal immigration and specific areas of foreign policy. Instead, you call her an idiot. Frankly, that reveals far more about yourself than you realize.
224 posted on 07/20/2009 4:50:50 PM PDT by Terpfen (FR is being Alinskied. Remember, you only take flak when you're over the target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Kells

Nice work, Kells. You know how to parse the media b.s.!!!


225 posted on 07/20/2009 4:54:52 PM PDT by dcgst4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Ron Paul attacks Sarah Palin as 'country club' Republican"

Hey Ron, go tack on another juicy Earmark for your district to the next Bill that's gonna pass and then "show us your courageous stand" by voting against it... (even though you know its going to pass!)

Ron, can you spell 'hypocrite"? I know you can...

226 posted on 07/20/2009 4:58:27 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (will work for bailout bonus.... Twitter: maddawggmorgan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished

The fact you asked that question shows how truly politically clueless you are.


227 posted on 07/20/2009 4:59:02 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: admin; moder_ator; administrator
The title of this thread is inaccurate. Please see post 223.

Thanks

228 posted on 07/20/2009 5:16:18 PM PDT by Kells (Andrew Jackson was the only President to pay off the National Debt. His Epitaph: "I Killed the Bank")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: dcgst4
Nice work, Kells. You know how to parse the media b.s.!!!

Thanks! Expect more media misdirection on the Fed Audit in the weeks and months ahead.

229 posted on 07/20/2009 5:18:24 PM PDT by Kells (Andrew Jackson was the only President to pay off the National Debt. His Epitaph: "I Killed the Bank")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
I always enjoy it when folks bring up their military record in a political conversation, especially when their politics is “out of band” vs most in the Military.

There is a fellow I work with, was injured in 2004 in Iraq, has a cluster of “Obama / Biden” and “Vets for Obama” stickers on the back of his truck, and was insufferable during and right after the election shilling for the Messiah.

Proof that Military Service, as much as I respect it, is no guarantee of political acumen...

230 posted on 07/20/2009 5:49:58 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (There's something socialist in the neighborhood, who ya gonna call? MITTBUSTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished

231 posted on 07/20/2009 5:52:12 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (There's something socialist in the neighborhood, who ya gonna call? MITTBUSTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished

232 posted on 07/20/2009 5:54:09 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (There's something socialist in the neighborhood, who ya gonna call? MITTBUSTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: dcgst4
You can ask about things that are none of your business but you won't get answers. The topic is not my service record but the Galveston paleopipsqueak's echoing of Neville Chamberlain's cowardice as his hope for the foreign policy of America leading to its demise. My generation killed the draft and it was the conservatives who killed the draft. Rumsfeld found a way around the benefits of that policy by extending service commitments. Let your generation work on that. I'll sign on for abolishing involuntary extensions of service. If you don't like the WOT, stay home and mind your own business. If you regret your military involvement there, study Arabic, learn the Koran and join up with Al Qaeda formally.

You expressed your opinion by enlisting. For the duration of your agreed enlistment, the policy decisions were no longer in your hands even as to you. You could serve or be court-martialed and punished if your constitutional pretensions motivated you to refuse obedience. The military is not an anarchy, not a democracy, not a republic but a disciplined force that necessarily submerges and suppresses your individual idiosyncracies in a common effort as you knew when you enlisted.

The constitution is a bit more complicated than the paleoPaulie stick figure version. Or than the delusional Libertoonian version (based on each anarchist singing I gotta be me).

Gee, you don't seem any better informed on Stalinism or on America than you are about the constitution.

The Bircher/Libertoonian fantasy of (whether you admit it or not) rank despicable isolationism may have worked in Washington's time for a verrrry fledgling nation primarily dependent on an ocean for its defense and even mqy have been a species of wisdom way back then. Baby elephants, like baby countries, are not in a very good position to throw their weight around. They tend to fly under radar to develop their resources. We have developed our resources. We needn't shun opportunities to put a stop to thugs wherever they are found. Nits become lice. We should have attacked Stalin as well as Hitler and Mussolini and Tojo.

If you are looking for those with Stalinist policies, try the real thing: the McGovern crowd, the various antiwar movements that facilitated soviet communism for soooooo very long. The best way of handling Stalin would have been to drive the Nazi army before us into Russia, let the main fighting be between Hitler and Stalin and then mop up the remains of both enemies.

Your "Was it worth...."question is pure John Kerry and no more American which is to say outright anti-American. Some of your buds died in wars??? Verrrrry few wars are ever fought without death and other casualties. You did not figure that out before enlisting???

If you think you love liberty, go find something worth doing like ending abortion or ending lavender marriage make-believe or abolishing gummint skewels (the parochial schools of the anti-American left. Of course, I would be presuming that you might be pro-life or pro-family or pro-truth in education. Since you apparently favor the ilk of the paleos and Paulie in particular, that is no guarantee.

I love certain aspects of the American government as exceptions to the rule. The Ohio National Guardsmen at Kent State in 1970; the Strategic Air Command; the late Air Force Chief of Staff General Curtis Lemay; General George Patton; the RTKBA; Ronald Reagan for whom I served as a state chairman when he challenged feckless paleopeaceweasel and babykiller Gerald Ford.

233 posted on 07/21/2009 1:18:18 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: camp_steveo
When domestic airliners are hijacked and flown into the Pentagon and the WTC, I refuse to get my undies in a bunch if the gummint inadvertently wiretaps your Aunt Pittypat's phone conversations leading to this week's Mah-Jong game. You are such a "non-interventionist" along with the paleosurrenderman that you oppose "intervening" (waging war) against this nation's enemies. Whoever you voted for in 2008, it is plain that you are not what you call a "neo-con" and that you are, in fact an isolationist whether you admit it or not. Are you enjoying the nearly non-stop Obama crawl on our bellies like reptiles sniffling apologies for deposing the communist likes of Mossagh Dagh (sp.?) and generally opposing despotism of the anti-American variety? El Run Paulie's foreign policy hallucinations seem so reflective of Obama's world apology tour.

The constitution largely died in the 1930s after FDR threatened to pack the SCOTUS with New Deal ideologues of the left. Read the dissents of McReynolds, Sutherland, van de Vanter and Butler. There have been a few small resurrections such as the DC RTKBA case. There have been foul latter day developments such as rights to lavender nuptials and to kill unborn children.

234 posted on 07/21/2009 1:37:03 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Now we have one purporting to speak for “every man who has ever fought in a war.” Paleos: The crackpot wing of American politics.


235 posted on 07/21/2009 1:40:22 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

236 posted on 07/21/2009 4:21:09 AM PDT by Ron H. (I believe in and practice the 4 Gs : God, Guns a Garden and Gold,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think the punctuation was wrong.

He must have said: “Country, (Gun-)Club Republicans”


237 posted on 07/21/2009 5:01:28 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Just like I love it when people say things like “real Americans” because their opinions are not the same as mine. I don’t want to mention any names...er..black elk


238 posted on 07/21/2009 6:31:37 AM PDT by camp_steveo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

BE, I think that you and I could actually have a lot in common, but your method of communicating your point is self-defeating.

You think that everyone with a different way of looking at things is an enemy of the state, and quite frankly, you are wrong.

I think that the state has a lot of problems that need to be addressed, and I am here on the FR to discuss that. I don’t mind being wrong, if it helps us all realize the truth.

I agree with your perspective on FDR and the USC. I think that is the biggest problem that we as a country face today.

There are other problems that we need to address as well, but resetting the USG to a constitutionally limited govt is the biggest challenge we face.

At this time, I think the things that RP has said about US foreign policy, and auditing the Fed are the kinds of reform that would help get the national debt paid down.

The national debt is how much...$60,000,000,000,000?

To continue operating this country the way we have been is suicidal. Something has to be done to pay off the debt.

If you have some other ideas on how to do that, then by all means, let us hear it.

Have you ever seen this documentary called I.O.U.S.A.?

Here’s part 1 of 9: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DcgjC5nVb8

The rest of the film is in the “related videos” section.

The US debt is unsustainable.

This is another one of the most important issues of our lifetimes. If we don’t do something about it, the US is likely to default and become irrelevant.

That is not something that I want for my country, and I know you don’t either.


239 posted on 07/21/2009 6:57:39 AM PDT by camp_steveo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is sad to see, I like Ron Paul, unfortunately he always finds a way to make himself irreverent. If Paul really wanted to be a player he'd be trying to ally himself with Palin instead of attacking her. Palin same old country club republican is a totally bogus charge. And by making that charge is proves once again, he is lost in space and irrelevant to the cause of restoring constitutional government to this republic.
240 posted on 07/21/2009 7:11:38 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson