Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge dismisses reservist's suit questioning Obama's presidency
Ledger-Enquirer ^ | Thursday, Jul. 16, 2009 | Lily Gordon

Posted on 07/16/2009 9:30:23 AM PDT by jaxon72

A federal judge this morning dismissed the suit filed here by a U.S. Army reservist who says he shouldn't have to go to Afghanistan because he believes Barack Obama was never eligible to be president.

Judge Clay Land sided with the defense, which claimed in its response to Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook's suit, filed July 8 with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, that Cook’s suit is “moot” in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to Afghanistan, so the relief he is seeking has been granted.

"Federal court only has authority of actual cases and controversies," Land said. "The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: article2section1; birthcertificate; certifigate; citizenship; cook; eligibility; ineligible; lawsuit; military; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamafile; orly; orlytaitz; ruling; stefancook; stephancook; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-244 next last
To: TribalPrincess2U

Amen!


101 posted on 07/16/2009 10:48:04 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Marie
It wouldn’t take 40,000 troops to make an impact. There are about 40 brigades in the army. Around 3,500 soldiers per brigade. A brigade cannot deploy with less than 95% strength and every deployment is close to that number at the time of deployment. (Pregnant females, illness, etc. This is NORMAL.) If 50-100 people in every brigade refused to go based on this president, it would cripple the entire military.

And friends, somewhere in Washington enshrined in some little folder, is a study in black and white of my fingerprints. And the only reason I'm singing you this song now is cause you may know somebody in a similar situation, or you may be in a similar situation, and if you're in a situation like that there's only one thing you can do and that's walk into the shrink wherever you are, just walk in say "Shrink, you can get anything you want, at Alice's restaurant." And walk out.

You know, if one person, just one person does it they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if two people, two people do it, in harmony, they may think they're both faggots and they won't take either of them. And three people do it, three, can you imagine, three people walking in singing a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. They may think it's an organization.

And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day walking in singing a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. And friends they may thinks it's a movement.

And that's what it is, the Alice's Restaurant Anti-Massacre Movement, and all you got to do to join is sing it the next time it comes around on the guitar.
102 posted on 07/16/2009 10:48:43 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Marie
The DOD *has* to court martial this guy. If they don’t, many soldiers will gather the courage to follow in his foot-steps. (Trust me, the bulk of the military doesn’t like this guy.) Quite literally, the army will have set the legal precedence to allow soldiers to strike.

Before they can court martial the guy, they have to order him to deploy, and he has to refuse the order. If they instead withdraw the deployment order (no doubt following the Chief's order), then they can't court martial him. And it will get very interesting if he starts a trend.

103 posted on 07/16/2009 10:51:21 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

Didn’t someone post in the last 48 hrs that Orly has others filing in Cook’s wake (no pun intended)?


104 posted on 07/16/2009 10:53:50 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

Comment #105 Removed by Moderator

To: cynwoody
Before they can court martial the guy, they have to order him to deploy, and he has to refuse the order. If they instead withdraw the deployment order (no doubt following the Chief's order), then they can't court martial him.

No, but the Secretary of the Army can send him a letter saying his service is no longer needed by the Army Reserves, thanking him for his service, and wishing him well in his future outside of the military. Don't be surprised if that happens.

106 posted on 07/16/2009 10:58:50 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: jaxon72

SCOTUS has rejected prior cases on a matter of standing. As many have mentioned on this thread, Major Cook, as a soldier ordered for deployment by the CiC, has standing.The fact that his orders were so quickly rescinded after filing this action seems to arouse suspicion in some.


107 posted on 07/16/2009 11:03:08 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Cook volunteered to go to Afghanistan back in May.

An officer suddenly becomes a conscientious objector after volunteering to be deployed? They rescinded the orders because Maj. Cook put personal politics above Country.

Hope it was worth his military and civilian careers.


108 posted on 07/16/2009 11:03:11 AM PDT by jaxon72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL

How many would believe it if they saw the actual birth certificate?


109 posted on 07/16/2009 11:04:42 AM PDT by jaxon72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Ironically, “quickest way of shutting down the suit” is actually the fastest way of showing us that something is indeed amiss with Obama’s birth certificate and legitimacy as CIC.


110 posted on 07/16/2009 11:06:56 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
The trick is finding a reason for the courts to examine the evidence, where the filer both has standing and the action requested is something the court has jurisdiction over.

There is the $64K question. I wonder if there is something he has done or bill he has signed that propels the average taxpayer to having standing if an attorney worded just right?

111 posted on 07/16/2009 11:09:41 AM PDT by lovesdogs (I will die on my feet if it is God's will. But I will not live on my knees for any man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The COURTS are a constitutional means. They are the third branch of government and in this case the only means by which we can get Bozo to pony up a BC.


112 posted on 07/16/2009 11:13:15 AM PDT by calex59 (I, me, myself, am actually Jim Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Perdogg said: "What if President Jindal orders forces into Korea and a soldier who didn't him like sues over eligibility? "

If the court permits the suit, then Jindal proves his eligibility, and the case is decided for the defense. Then the military court-martials the soldier for disobeying a lawful order and the soldier spends time in a military prison. Other soldiers will recognize the validity of Jindal's eligibility and will obey lawful orders.

What's the problem with that?

113 posted on 07/16/2009 11:17:03 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: shay in florida

I thought that Jindal is the USA born offspring of naturalized parents, which is one definition of “natural born”.


114 posted on 07/16/2009 11:19:08 AM PDT by Don W (The root word of diversity is DIVIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
SCOTUS has rejected prior cases on a matter of standing. As many have mentioned on this thread, Major Cook, as a soldier ordered Volunteered for deployment by the CiC, has standing.The fact that his orders were so quickly rescinded after filing this action seems to arouse suspicion in some.

Fixed it.

115 posted on 07/16/2009 11:20:57 AM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL

>>> If they did that, why then would they have joined our armed forces - voluntarily - in the first place?

Not everyone who joins the military voluntarily is actually prepared to pay the ultimate sacrifice for their country.

Said another way....

Nobody actually knows whether or not they will be willing to throw themselves on a grenade to save others UNTIL they are presented with that opportunity.

Not all sacrifices require the forfeiture of life.
I sincerely hope that Major Cook proceeded with the knowledge of what was to follow... Otherwise his sacrifice may be in vain.

If others in his position fail to recognize the significance of what has transpired, the opportunity to carry forward Cook’s efforts will expire... and Cook’s sacrifice in some respects again will be in vain.

The wisdom of Cook’s decision is therefore dependent upon a gamble that others in his position share his dedication to duty.

Strength and technology doesn’t win wars... the will to fight does. I don’t think Obama believes that our men and women in uniform have the will to fight. Again... is he right?

That depends upon the answer to your question.
Only time will tell.


117 posted on 07/16/2009 11:22:16 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: jaxon72

“the actual birth certificate..”

Which one? I read that he has 39 different Social Security numbers (under the name Obama Barak, etal)registered by address in just about everyother state in this union. How did he get those numbers without registering birthcertificates? More importantly why did he do this?


118 posted on 07/16/2009 11:22:30 AM PDT by Blu By U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Exactly where in the Constitution are such suits prohibited?


119 posted on 07/16/2009 11:25:44 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

first of all, the SCOTUS has ruled that a soldier cannot sue he superior officier.

second of all, it could be used as a means to harass the office of the presidency.


120 posted on 07/16/2009 11:25:50 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson