The Major says: "[Then] any order coming out of the presidency or his chain of command is illegal. Should I deploy, I would essentially be following an illegal [order]. If I happened to be captured by the enemy in a foreign land, I would not be privy to the Geneva Convention protections," he said.
1 posted on
07/15/2009 5:37:44 AM PDT by
buggy02
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: buggy02
2 posted on
07/15/2009 5:41:57 AM PDT by
BornToBeAmerican
(We the people, ..... never)
To: buggy02
This story has become very interesting in the past 24 hours, yet is being completely ignored by the MSM.
To: buggy02
His next deployment will probably be Ft. Leavenworth.
6 posted on
07/15/2009 5:43:44 AM PDT by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: sam_paine; tcrlaf
Looks like another thread started.
What other of our brave military men and women will be seeking the same revoke of orders?
With the new engagement policies in Afghanistan, we might see a lot more of this.
Okay 0 what you going to do next to undermine our country and our military?
13 posted on
07/15/2009 5:50:41 AM PDT by
VicVega
(Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
To: buggy02
What it means is that this guy’s career is ovuh.
15 posted on
07/15/2009 5:52:08 AM PDT by
IronJack
(=)
To: buggy02
HMMMMMMMMMMMM
Intersting to say the least.
16 posted on
07/15/2009 5:55:13 AM PDT by
DeaconRed
(BO STINKS)
To: buggy02
Don’t be surprised if the government is getting ready for a court martial.......they will be compelled t o send a message.
17 posted on
07/15/2009 5:55:26 AM PDT by
kenmcg
(THE)
To: buggy02
This is a stupid headline. What is so "shocking".
This officer's career is over and he'll either face multiple articles of UCMJ like #'s relating to
like article 88, 117, or conduct unbecoming...or just be allowed to resign his commission if they don't want a show "trial".
19 posted on
07/15/2009 5:56:05 AM PDT by
erman
(Outside of a dog, a book is man's best companion. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.)
To: buggy02
So what happens to Maj Cook now?
I'm glad he 'won'. Yet, I am a bit concerned that it was so easy...something's not right.
Or, did he actually do what everyone else was afraid to do and that's why it was so easy?
God Bless him and Protect him.
To: buggy02
24 posted on
07/15/2009 6:00:13 AM PDT by
drumr337
(I voted 4 Palin)
To: buggy02
28 posted on
07/15/2009 6:02:48 AM PDT by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: buggy02
Therefore, EVERY member of the military should challenge Zero.
30 posted on
07/15/2009 6:03:15 AM PDT by
Sig Sauer P220
(Forget going Galt. Its time to go Braveheart.)
To: buggy02
They revoked the order because that would make a legal challenge “moot” and therefore would not be heard by any court.
To: buggy02; All
The orders were revoked to moot the case and deprive Major Cook of standing to sue. However, there might be a way for him to keep the case going. Anybody who's ever been in the military knows that all personnel are at the mercy of orders that can send them anywhere, anytime. Those which are revoked can be reinstated and those which are reinstated can be revoked. The revocation of the orders itself gives no reason(s) for the action; full discovery is essential to see why it was done and what assurance Major Cook has, if any, that the orders won't be reinstated as soon as the suit is dismissed as allegedly moot. Thus, Major Cook could argue the case is not moot and he still has standing because his orders can be reinstated any time DOD decides to reinstate them unless there is further clarification of the reasons for their rescission and the circumstances of their possible reinstatement.
Another point is that this action by DOD opens the floodgates for every other military and naval person who wants not to serve in any location to raise the same objection and pressure DOD into rescinding his or her orders, an unacceptable situation that can only be resolved by allowing the case to go forward.
To: buggy02
It will take the U.S. military to save us here at home. Defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Well done.
43 posted on
07/15/2009 6:10:32 AM PDT by
SueRae
To: buggy02; All
Interesting post/thread. Thanks.
47 posted on
07/15/2009 6:17:03 AM PDT by
PGalt
To: buggy02; DieHard the Hunter; BornToBeAmerican; WakeUpAndVote; Rational Thought; Tin Man Tex; ...
How do we reconcile this action with the objectors who refused their duty claiming that Bush was selected-not-elected, or that Iraq was an illegal war? Peter Brown, Ehren Watada, etc
http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=3455
48 posted on
07/15/2009 6:17:06 AM PDT by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: buggy02
Or maybe the Army just doesn’t want this guy commanding troops in the field. I sure wouldn’t want him as my commanding officer under the circumstances.
50 posted on
07/15/2009 6:18:40 AM PDT by
Hugin
(Sarah Palin: accept no substitutes!)
To: buggy02
I hope road dog and zer0 have their day in front of a fair judge. zer0 should have to produce a real birth certificate, not a certificate of live birth.
The Major is going to need some money for this fight.
Lipstick on a zer0 is still a zer0
52 posted on
07/15/2009 6:19:18 AM PDT by
reefdiver
(So how's that HOPE & CHANGE working out for ya ?)
To: buggy02
Excellent point about the Geneva Conventions.
I can’t see how this officer could be court-martialed without the opportunity to have Obama’s long-form birth certificate reviewed, by the court or otherwise.
Sounds like Obamas’s people thought of this too.
The fact that action was taken to make this lawsuit moot is very telling.
We may be in worse trouble than even I thought. I am hoping that somnehow this whole mess gets resolved soon - no matter how remote the chance.
54 posted on
07/15/2009 6:19:31 AM PDT by
cvq3842
(Countless thousands of our ancestors died to give us the freedom we have today. Stay involved!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson