Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schism Closer As US Anglicans Vote To Overturn Ban On Gay Ordination
London Times ^ | July 13th 2009

Posted on 07/13/2009 7:00:06 PM PDT by Steelfish

July 14, 2009

Schism closer as US Anglicans vote to overturn ban on gay ordinations

Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent

A formal split in the Anglican Church worldwide moved closer yesterday after clergy and laity in the US voted to allow the consecration of openly gay bishops.

The Archbishop of Canterbury expressed “regret” over a decision by Anglicans in the US that represents a blow to his hopes for Church unity. Dr Rowan Williams made clear his concern after the Episcopal Church voted at the triannual General Convention in California to overturn a moratorium on gay ordinations.

Clergy and laity in the US backed a motion that “acknowledges that God has called and may call any individual in the Church to any ordained ministry in the Episcopal Church, in accordance with the discernment process set forth in the Constitution and Canons of the Church”.

This means that anyone will be able to be ordained regardless of sexuality if the US bishops back the move when they vote on it in the next few days, making formal schism inevitable.

The vote represents a snub to Dr Williams, who flew last week to the convention and pleaded in a sermon on Thursday for the Episcopalians not to do anything to “push us further apart”, thereby jeopardising the fragile Church unity he has struggled so hard to maintain.

Dr Williams has found his time as Archbishop dominated by having to deal with the fallout from the consecration of the openly gay Gene Robinson as Bishop of New Hampshire in 2003, an event that has taken the worldwide church to the brink of schism.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: New Hampshire; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: ecusa; europeanchristians; gaybishopsschism; homosexualagenda; homosexualbishop; religiousleft; rowanwilliams; schism; sin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2009 7:00:07 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“...jeopardising the FARCE he has struggled so hard to maintain.”


2 posted on 07/13/2009 7:05:31 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

If the individual is not sexually active, I have no problem with this.

If they are sexually active, it is a sin & the church is domed!!

(My mother was Episcopal, I was baptized in the Episcopal church. I’m glad she’s not alive to see what it has become)


3 posted on 07/13/2009 7:07:10 PM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Split and get it over with. The “gay ordination” church will die off in 25 years anyway.


4 posted on 07/13/2009 7:07:57 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I don’t see the problem. People who can’t abide homosexuals behind the pulpit and in the leadership, should vote with their feet and join a church that more closely follows scripture.


5 posted on 07/13/2009 7:18:38 PM PDT by umgud (Look to gov't to solve your everday problems and they'll control your everday life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

A wonderful site for news about Orthodox Anglicanism is VirtueOnline at http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/index.php


6 posted on 07/13/2009 7:20:18 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

I was also baptized and confirmed as an Episcopalian. This saddens me and I know it’s the end of the once-great church. God will NOT be mocked.


7 posted on 07/13/2009 7:21:28 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: umgud
I don’t see the problem. People who can’t abide homosexuals behind the pulpit and in the leadership, should vote with their feet and join a church that more closely follows scripture.

Why is the reverse not true? Why should ANYONE feel it necessary to agitate for a church to "change" when a new denomination with the new beliefs can be formed at any time?

People are free to create a new church that believes in homosexual bishops, contraception, e-meters, and/or Tiamat. Why must the Catholic Church for example be agitated against to adopt any of those?

The only conclusion is that it is an attack on the established churches. Not in an effort to change them, but to destroy them from within.

Seriously, if you believe in women priests then you are not a Catholic and should join or form a church that believes that. If you believe in psychiatry then you are not a Scientologist and should not be a member.

It is STUPID to advocate for a church to change its beliefs and theology to fit yours. Just go to a church that believes as you do.
8 posted on 07/13/2009 7:27:35 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: umgud

***I don’t see the problem. People who can’t abide homosexuals behind the pulpit and in the leadership, should vote with their feet and join a church that more closely follows scripture.***

It’s about legitimacy. If you can warp (especially in secret) the basis for an organization, then you have the ability to legitimize your own particular predilections and have the organization consider them mainstream.


9 posted on 07/13/2009 7:33:32 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr; Arkinsaw

You may have misunderstood me. I would vote with my feet and join a church that did not ordain homosexuals.


10 posted on 07/13/2009 7:41:45 PM PDT by umgud (Look to gov't to solve your everday problems and they'll control your everday life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PGR88; Steelfish; secret garden
Split and get it over with. The “gay ordination” church will die off in 25 years anyway.

Nope. That's why the Catholic “gay church” actively and continuously recruits ... alter boys, young priests, older priests, nuns....

This “leader” is so focused on preserving the “unity” he treasures so much that he is missing the sin.

11 posted on 07/13/2009 7:46:41 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

You may have gotten this one wrong. The Catholic Church realizing its cancer extirpated it with zero tolerance. The rule of Benedict is that when it’s pruned, it grows.


12 posted on 07/13/2009 7:49:21 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Anglican ping


13 posted on 07/13/2009 7:50:36 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

***You may have misunderstood me. I would vote with my feet and join a church that did not ordain homosexuals.***

Apologies for the less than clear post. What I meant was that the reasons for suborning an institution are normally that one wishes to legitimize one’s actions or beliefs that in opposition to that institution.

Our hope is that the US Anglicans move away from their current path and start back onto the Via of Christ.


14 posted on 07/13/2009 8:01:25 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

***You may have gotten this one wrong. The Catholic Church realizing its cancer extirpated it with zero tolerance. The rule of Benedict is that when it’s pruned, it grows.***

Looking at the current field of bishops in the US, there is only overwhelming evidence of that. I think that there are only a handful of Marxist liberation theologians in a see in the US. BXVI is greater than any of us (and I was a fan before he was chosen - and scarcely dared to hope) had even expected. Not only is he a very able administrator, but he has the Orthodox, even, excited because of his teachings and his pronouncements.

One of our Orthodox friends considers him as a possible Doctor of the Church - the first in nearly a millennium.


15 posted on 07/13/2009 8:05:41 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
Well of course they are sexually active. Chaste homosexuals have always been welcome, at least in recent years. The pressure now is from the sodomite lobby who want their perversions redefined from "sin" and "abomination", as God called them, to "love" deserving the blessing of that same God. And they have seized control by running off the faithful.

Piskies can cheer up though, when they watch their congregations wither and die. The ELCA Lutherans are right behind them and will join the Gay Pride Charade at their Churchwide Assembly in August. Maybe they can merge and form some kind of demonic communion together..

16 posted on 07/13/2009 8:10:08 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

If Archbishop of Canterbury had a clue, he’d have said, “Go ahead - make my day!”


17 posted on 07/13/2009 8:15:59 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; x_plus_one; bastantebueno55; Needham; sc70; jpr_fire2gold; Tennessee Nana; QBFimi; ...
Thanks to Fractal Trader for the ping.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail Huber or sionnsar if you want on or off this low-volume ping list.
This list is pinged by Huber and sionnsar.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Humor: The Anglican Blue

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

18 posted on 07/13/2009 11:53:11 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Neda Agha-Soltan - murdered by illegitimate government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Got to disagree with you here.

We used to be Episcopalian (shoot, I was a sixth-generation Episcopalian) but GC 2003 was too much for us. Since we're "high", the logical safe harbor for us was the Catholic Church, but I was well aware of the homosexual predator problems there.

Not wishing to jump from the frying pan into the fire, I thoroughly looked into the issue from every angle I could (including talking to some lawyers who had been involved in the original prosecutions here).

Not only was the archdiocese here extremely proactive about cleaning things up and making sure that nothing of the sort happened again, Benedict XVI is replacing homosexual sympathizers with extremely orthodox bishops, inspecting seminaries and religious orders, and generally cleaning house on the highest levels.

I don't for a moment imagine that (1) they can get rid of EVERYBODY all at once, or (2) that a few lowlifes won't sneak through. But the Church has taken a very proactive approach (and its actions have been audited favorably by an outside consultant), while a lot of other churches, schools, and so forth are in complete denial.

19 posted on 07/14/2009 8:00:38 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

“If Archbishop of Canterbury had a clue...”

He’d have taken the proactive position and booted the whole damned Episcopal Church - and damned it is - out of the Anglican Communion. It was becoming obvious by the ‘80s and certainly by the ‘90s that the homosexual activists had targeted the weakest of the mainline churches for takeover. The last couple of diocesan conventions I attended were dominated by the topic, to the exclusion of just about everything else except racism, guns, and the environment. It was more like attending a legislative session than a church convention. Not much “Jesus” talk to be heard there, I’m afraid. A born and raised Episcopalian, I finally bailed in 2003. I’m almost grateful Mom had Alzheimers by then and didn’t have to see what her beloved church had turned into before God took her home.


20 posted on 07/14/2009 10:26:00 AM PDT by beelzepug (It's not what you said, it's how you said it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson