Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC to Cover Pulled Free Republic Thread on Monday's David Shuster Show
Twitter and Daily Kos | Saturday, July 11, 2009 | Kristinn

Posted on 07/11/2009 4:53:55 PM PDT by kristinn

The Daily Kos has a post up quoting MSNBC personality David Shuster's Twitter page stating his show will be covering the controversy over Free Republic and comments about Malia Obama:

@mikelord @thejoshuablog. We will cover this monday: http://bit.ly/3pqS7M. But follow @joetrippi for what can be done on-line. about 2 hours ago from web

The embedded link goes to the Vancouver Sun hit piece posted earlier to FR

Over at Twitter, the leftists are all in a hypocritical lather over FR.

David Shuster is on sometime mid-afternoon East Coast time Monday-Friday.


TOPICS: Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: davidshuster; freerepublic; malia; msnbc; msnbchomosexuals; obamafamily; pantiesinawad; poofter; smear; troll; trolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 861-872 next last
To: HereInTheHeartland
Those are some really uncalled for (and stupid and offensive comments). Leave the kids out of it..

"Leave the kids out of it" my a$$.

If the Obama's don't wish to draw undue attention on their children and use them to make a point when they're overseas representing America, they ought to dress them like little ladies befitting of the president's office instead of parading them around like little hoodie leftist hipsters.

I don't remember the Palin kids being left "out of it." They're still busy dragging them around through the dirt, even the baby with Downes Syndrome.

61 posted on 07/11/2009 5:12:45 PM PDT by AAABEST (And the light shineth in darkness: and the darkness did not comprehend it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
And Twitter? Only dweebs and gruel pukers watch Twitter.

Read JimRob's tag line ;-)

62 posted on 07/11/2009 5:13:15 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Mainstream media waking up to conservative websites. Let’s light the fires & kick tires & tell’em “bring it on”.


63 posted on 07/11/2009 5:13:37 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

MSNBC? Aren’t those the clowns with the little “news” network?


64 posted on 07/11/2009 5:13:47 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

I whole-heartedly agree with you. Why, in the name of reason and common sense and decency, would anyone make such trashy, low-down comments about a child? And I don’t care whose child it is— Obama’s or Bush’s or Palin’s or yours or mine. It’s wrong.


65 posted on 07/11/2009 5:14:16 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty

No comparison here to the sewage you can read everyday on KOS or DU.


66 posted on 07/11/2009 5:14:23 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
He can put all the stuff he wants on there. As far as "reading it", that's totally different.

There are far better sources.

67 posted on 07/11/2009 5:14:48 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
What’s that website number again?

Joe Biden's looking it up.

68 posted on 07/11/2009 5:14:49 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I’d be curious to hear what that Jim Thompson guy has to say about all this.


69 posted on 07/11/2009 5:14:55 PM PDT by Sylvester McMonkey McBean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Woo hoo!!

Woo hoo is right, money coming your way!


70 posted on 07/11/2009 5:15:28 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 50mm
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
71 posted on 07/11/2009 5:16:11 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

The peace symbol is ubiquitous on tween clothing these days. There’s nothing “politically charged” about it. The peace symbol, to kids these days, means nothing more than “peace is good” (it is, isn’t it?) and they think they look cool because it looks like the ‘60s (which they barely know about). It’s an innocent style fad, like tie dye (which has also come back in style). People need to stop trying to make it something it’s not. (And, yes, I know the symbol originally was anti-nuclear but that was a UK-based group that is barely known in the US and if you asked most Americans about the peace symbol they would make no such political association).


72 posted on 07/11/2009 5:16:13 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I never saw that thread. I'm glad I didn't because I don't condone that kind of action from anyone. Everyone's kids should be off limits.

That being said, I didn't notice PMS-NBC doing a story on the hateful things that were said about Sarah Palin's children. They even bashed that precious little Trig.

Of course, the media is in bed with the White House, so they only report what the "annointed one" allows them to do. As far as Obama is concerned, he's a total pos. I don't like him, and I haven't seen anything that makes me change my mind. He's a liar, and a socialist/communist and he has about as much business running America as Donald Duck does.

73 posted on 07/11/2009 5:16:29 PM PDT by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

The problem was comments made about her, not what she was wearing, and additional racist comments about her mother.

That and apparently nobody noticed and reported it to the moderators until someone outside found it and publicized it.


74 posted on 07/11/2009 5:16:47 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: berdie

later


75 posted on 07/11/2009 5:16:55 PM PDT by berdie (Philosophies of the school room in one generation will reflect the government philosophy of the next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The Daily Kos

You have got to be kidding me. Criticizing others for the same things they do? Where is their support for freedom of speech? I'm so sick and tired of those that think that their shtick don't stink.

76 posted on 07/11/2009 5:17:09 PM PDT by DejaJude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
So, has pMSNBC requested you be on?

Or maybe someone competant.

77 posted on 07/11/2009 5:17:15 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
The young lady wore an exceedingly offensive t-shirt at the G-8 summit. Her father should have been horsewhipped for making her do that.

(Duh, is that better?)

78 posted on 07/11/2009 5:17:25 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There are far better sources.

I will give them credit for breaking the Steve McNair story last Saturday.

79 posted on 07/11/2009 5:17:43 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

We have the New York Times attempting to slime John McCain with completely unsubstantiated allegations that he had an affair with a lobbyist on its front page as soon as he got the nomination, after they endorsed him. They have complete editorial control over what goes into their paper.

And that’s just fine, right?

We have Andrew Sullivan writing at the Atlantic, ostensibly a prestegious publication, that Trig is not Sarah Palin’s daughter...still, to this day, and they have editorial control.

There is lots more, of course.

This is a message board, fgs. People can say what they want, even people who come here specifically to create controversy. Remember MD4Bush?


80 posted on 07/11/2009 5:18:46 PM PDT by Bahbah (Only dead fish go with the flow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 861-872 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson