No matter what she does, her army of apologists will make excuses for her and lash out at those who dare to criticize her by accusing them of being liberal elitists who are threatened by her sheer awesomeness....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
She is not a Reagan or a Thatcher, that is true enough. She is a lot like Elisabeth Hasselbeck on policy.
28 posted on
07/06/2009 7:32:09 AM PDT by
The Toll
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Did anyone catch the look of confusion and stunned dismay on Obama’s and Axelrod’s faces as Sarah
spun around
saw her opening
and ran toward HER goal?
In the words of Vince Lombardi, if you want to win, “Run to Daylight”
29 posted on
07/06/2009 7:32:16 AM PDT by
syriacus
(Palin the ANTI-OBAMA says, "Only dead fish go with the flow.")
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Sounds like Mr. Klein got his butt spanked here on FR.
31 posted on
07/06/2009 7:33:10 AM PDT by
rintense
(Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Palin’s chief asset is the dearth of conservative Republicans.
32 posted on
07/06/2009 7:33:36 AM PDT by
Mr Rogers
(I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Hunter 2012. More Reaganesque than Reagan.
35 posted on
07/06/2009 7:34:41 AM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Palin doesn't need to be Reagan to be a worthwhile candidate.
36 posted on
07/06/2009 7:35:01 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I’d love to see the admin moderators start nuking Sara threads this week.
Sick to death of wading through them to find any that aren’t someones opinion of why she quit, why she shouldn’t be considered, why she should sue the blogger, NYT, Washingtonpost.
If Sara had a statement, that would be worth reading.
37 posted on
07/06/2009 7:35:07 AM PDT by
listenhillary
(90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Yet another pundit who views Palin as just another pol with an eye on the White House. I’m convinced that’s not even on her scope right now.
38 posted on
07/06/2009 7:35:53 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Impeach President Soros!!!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
She doesn’t need to be Reagan. She needs to be Sarah.
42 posted on
07/06/2009 7:37:18 AM PDT by
Pistolshot
(The Soap-box, The Ballot-box, The Jury-box, And The Cartridge-Box ...we are past 2 of them.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Palin is like Forrest at Fort Donelson: She is being attacked by an enemy that will not relent, while dealing with people that wish to surrender the common folks while escaping themselves
44 posted on
07/06/2009 7:38:27 AM PDT by
sticker
To: Behind Liberal Lines
50 posted on
07/06/2009 7:39:54 AM PDT by
mo
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Klein, IMO, is absolutely correct.
Palin, as attractive as she is, really needs to spend more time immersed in the issues...speaking on them....thinking about them....writing about them....I think the notion that she must run in 2012 is misguided.
I hope that is her plan.
She has awesome potential.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I loooooooooove Sarah. Her imperfections pale next to her attributes. And, who else do we have in non-RINO-land?
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Reagan could not have pulled off the slit skirt as well as she does...
To: Behind Liberal Lines
For me, I think Palin is the 21st Century version of Barry Goldwater, a polarizing presidential candidate in 1964, who inspired a generation of conservative voters. These Goldwater conservatives helped bring Ronald Reagan 16 years later.
With Palin out making stump speeches and raising money for conservatives, she could motivate a new generation of conservative voters to get involved. Palin may have killed her chances at the Presidency, but she may pave the way for someone else to be Reagan’s heir.
68 posted on
07/06/2009 7:44:15 AM PDT by
yongin
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Palin Is No Reagan Todd would be pretty bummed if she was Reagan.
69 posted on
07/06/2009 7:44:23 AM PDT by
listenhillary
(90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
And the A Spectator is no spokesman for the Grassroots. Go have another box of Chablis.
Pray for America and Gov Palin
71 posted on
07/06/2009 7:44:54 AM PDT by
bray
(Rope & Chains)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Reagan already invented Reagan.
All Sarah has to do is follow the recipe.
Maybe add a dash or sprinkle of insight along the way.
Beats the hell out of the RHINO stew the GOP is serving up.
78 posted on
07/06/2009 7:45:51 AM PDT by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
87 posted on
07/06/2009 7:47:53 AM PDT by
ken21
(i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
The idea that Sarah Palin is somehow compariable to Reagan on any level is ridiculous.
Reagan was a political heavyweight. Palin is a political lightlight. End of story.
93 posted on
07/06/2009 7:50:56 AM PDT by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson