To: Behind Liberal Lines
Palin doesn't need to be Reagan to be a worthwhile candidate.
36 posted on
07/06/2009 7:35:01 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: trisham
Palin doesn't need to be Reagan to be a worthwhile candidate. You are right. She'll do just fine being Palin...
45 posted on
07/06/2009 7:38:45 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Central park didn't hit 85 degrees in June this year - last time was 1916. Al Gore is nuts.)
To: trisham
Palin doesn't need to be Reagan to be a worthwhile candidate.
And therein lies the problem with this analysis. It assumes that the only way she can win is to "be like Reagan", and follow his path exactly.
Obama is most certainly no Reagan. He never finished his first term in the U.S. Senate, and campaigned for president from day one of taking office there.
But Obama is now in the White House. The rules have changed, apparently. I don't think necessarily for the better, but they are what they are.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson