Skip to comments.
McCain staffers push back on Vanity Fair's Palin profile
Washington Times ^
| June 30, 2009
| Amanda Carpenter
Posted on 06/30/2009 2:48:35 PM PDT by SolidWood
Alaskan Governor and GOP 2008 vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin may be nice looking, but she sure wasnt a very good candidate is the bottom line of Vanity Fairs 9,920-word profile about her released Tuesday.
The comments about her beauty weren't entirely complimentary, either. Vanity Fair writer Todd S. Purdum said her looks probably hurt her as much it helped win voters during the campaign.
The brunt of his article, the notion that she was never suited to run nationally, relied heavily on unattributed quotes from McCain campaign staffers who felt she wasnt up to snuff and refused properly study up on policy issues.
The Democratic National Committee quickly seized on the story and it was the first nondorsement of 2012.
Three McCain staffers, however, were immediately willing to go on the record with the Washington Times in their support for Mrs. Palin after the Vanity Fair piece was published online.
Randy Scheunemann, director of foreign policy and national security for the McCain-Palin campaign and who played Joe Biden in Mrs. Palins debate prep, was happy to push back against the Vanity Fair piece, saying she was an impressive and capable candidate.
He recalled her performance in the vice-presidential debate where she held her own and went toe-to-toe against Mr. Biden, a candidate with much more experience in debates and decades of public service. She was incredibly hard-working and concerned shed do a good job for John McCain who was a national hero and plucked her from obscurity, Mr. Scheunemann said. That weighed on her every day.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: liarschmidt; mccain; mittromney; msm; palin; rino; rinoromney; rinos; romney; romneyantipalin; sarahpalin; schmidt; slander; steveschmidt; vanityfair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Must ReadMcCain Campaign staffers defending and praising Palin against the slander coming from the Steve Schmidt (pro-gay, liberal RINO) corner.
1
posted on
06/30/2009 2:48:37 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
To: Abbeville Conservative; sleepwalker; Roses0508; feedback doctor; LibLieSlayer; ...
Palin PING!
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
2
posted on
06/30/2009 2:50:15 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
To: SolidWood
We have such a split between reality and the bs that makes the rounds. In reality Palin was a great vp candidate who did much for the McCain campaign. Also a popular governor and no reason to believe she’s anything but smart.
3
posted on
06/30/2009 2:51:05 PM PDT
by
Williams
(It's The Policies, Stupid.)
To: SolidWood
They just wont quit going after Sarah. Must be threatened.
To: SolidWood
“The brunt of his article, the notion that she was never suited to run nationally, relied heavily on unattributed quotes from McCain campaign staffers who felt she wasnt up to snuff and refused properly study up on policy issues.”
Well written, there, genius...
5
posted on
06/30/2009 2:51:58 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: SolidWood
To: SolidWood
7
posted on
06/30/2009 2:57:14 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
To: SolidWood
McCain vetter Culvahouse (Reagan guy) has nothing but praise for Palin:
As do I!
8
posted on
06/30/2009 2:59:23 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: SolidWood
Reps need to grow Spines. The attack on Palin’s looks is an attack on all women. The Staffers should have said “An attack on her looks is against all women candidates and is disgusting. Palin is a formidable candidate and an attack on her “looks” demeans all women candidates”.
9
posted on
06/30/2009 3:01:13 PM PDT
by
sr4402
To: SolidWood
Late in October, The American Spectator's The Prowler revealed:
"Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers, some of whom are currently working for Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin's bid for the White House,
have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election.
'Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won't be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012,'
says one former Romney aide, now working for McCain-Palin.
'The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney.
He's in charge on November 5th.'"
The Prowler added: "Some former Romney aides were behind the recent leaks to media, including CNN, that Governor Sarah Palin was a 'diva' and was going off message intentionally."
The Romney supporters in the McCain campaign had access to internal polling which indicated well in advance of the November 4 election that McCain had no chance to win.
So they began working to position their man Mitt for a run in 2012. Just two days after the election,The Palmetto Scoop reported:
"One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"Im told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palins people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romneys former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
These aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
Erick Erickson, who organized Operation Leper, said:
"Heres what I think: I think there are some staffers on the McCain campaign who seriously screwed up the roll out of Sarah Palin, to which Governor Palin herself objected.
These staffers are now out trying to finish her off thinking, as typical D.C. types do, that if they dont do it to her, shell do it to them. They just never understood who Palin is or what she is about."
"Likewise, I do think there are some staffers and others who expect Mitt Romney to run again in 2012,
they decided McCain could not win, and decided to undermine Sarah Palin and her chances hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Schmidt was importuned by several of the Republican aspirants for president earlier this year.
Mitt Romney sent him an antique chair to symbolize a seat at the table."
"Romney would not say whether hed been vetted,
but did insist that the vice presidency was a subject he had never even so much discussed with McCain,
with whom he often tangled bitterly in the primary campaign.
So I tried another tack, recalling that I had been in a car with McCain and his then aide John Weaver,
reporting a piece for V.F. in the fall of 2006,
just after McCain delivered an address at Boston Colleges opening convocation.
Weavers phone rang, and it was someone at B.C.,
informing him that Romneys office had just called to ask when he would be invited to speak."
"Texan helped McCain secure Romney endorsement
AUSTIN The decision by Mitt Romney to endorse John McCain didn't just happen, of course. It took a Texan who knows something about uniting fierce political rivals.
John Weaver, Mr. McCain's former political guru, was the intermediary who initiated talks between the two sides that led to Mr. Romney's announcement of support.
...Here's how the two came to make a joint appearance Thursday in Boston: Last week, Mr. Weaver got a call from McCain aides Charlie Black and Steve Schmidt, who asked if he would help broker an endorsement.
Mr. Weaver, who had left the McCain campaign in last year's shakeup, is a longtime friend of Beth Myers, Mr. Romney's campaign manager.."
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
Poor sport spoiler Romney doing what he does best:
Novak: "Fred Thompson drop-out rumors traced to Romney campaign"
Said Novak: "The rumors were traced in part to Mitt Romney's campaign,
trying to stir up strife between McCain and Thompson."
"Despite outspending his rivals by huge margins throughout the primaries,
(Mitt Romney, Carpetbagger UT,CA,MA,NH,Mexico) lost Iowa, South Carolina, Florida and California.
The only primaries he won were in Michigan, where Dad was governor; LDS states;
and a few states on Super Tuesday in which his California-obsessed rivals
couldn't spare the cash to advertise.
Only John Connolly in 1968 had a worse cash-to-delegates ratio.
And John McCain rightly did not like Romney's tactics during the primaries.
(W)hen (Romney's early leads) started slipping away, he resorted to unfair,
distorted, scorched-earth negative ads, betting that his opponents couldn't
afford to spend enough for the truth to catch up to his charges."
[Romney: A Mistake for McCain, 7/23/2008, Dick Morris]
To: SolidWood
Wasn't a good candidate ROFLMAO.
So 15K-20K crowds weren't good enough, compared to the 5(I mean just 5)-600 that JM attracted alone.
11
posted on
06/30/2009 3:02:44 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Barry: mentally deficient & narcissistic misogynist megalomaniac psychopath w/ paranoid delusions)
To: SolidWood
WITCH HUNT ALERT!!! Why don’t the cowards come out and show their G-Dam faces? If she’s such a loser destined to fade away what do they have to lose? How much is Mitt paying them?
To: jessduntno
Wow... Mrs Carpenter dropped a “to”. Thanks Grammar Police.
13
posted on
06/30/2009 3:06:25 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
To: toddausauras
What’s your proof that Mitt is behind this.
I have no dog in this fight. None of the current GOP front runners do a thing for me.
14
posted on
06/30/2009 3:07:29 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
The Democratic National Committee quickly seized on the story and it was the first "nondorsement of 2012."
...okay, but what is this 'Vanity Fair' they keep talking about? ;')
15
posted on
06/30/2009 3:08:45 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: dfwgator
16
posted on
06/30/2009 3:11:19 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
To: Diogenesis
Thank you. I always suspected as much. He still refuses to acknowledge her in a positive way. Speaks volumes to me.
17
posted on
06/30/2009 3:14:02 PM PDT
by
SueRae
To: SolidWood
Read it again...she did more than that, professor...
18
posted on
06/30/2009 3:14:11 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: SolidWood
It is remarkable to me that the press can not seem to leave her alone. If she didn’t sell newspapers or TV time, we would never hear about her; and her political future would be in doubt.
As long as the MSM keeps her in the news, and the DEMS keep trying to bash her potential, the more Palin becomes viable in 12 or beyond. The limp-wristed attacks against her from disenfranchised rinos who worked on the McCain/Palin campaign, is only going to draw the attention of voters. Once those voters get the Palin/conservative message they will stick with her.
The MSM is blowing it. Remember the old political adage, “Print anything you want about me, just spell the name right.”
What happened to the GOP listening tour, heard any news from them lately?
It is horrible reading, but may not ultimately hurt her to get the press she is.
19
posted on
06/30/2009 3:15:35 PM PDT
by
FilmCutter
( Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. - Barry Goldwater)
To: dfwgator
No proof, just a strong suspicion that he and others are firmly behind this. It certainly adds up.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson