Posted on 06/24/2009 6:08:46 PM PDT by Ladycalif
I think so too.
But he'll have the mullahs over for turkey dogs on the 4th and have some good laughs.
F#ck China and f#ck the mullahs.
It is a fallacy for so many to say that President Obama is “weak” regarding what is happening in Iran. That’s simply WRONG. He is making clear exactly where he stands — and WHO he stands with. He’s even sending Ambassador’s back to Iran’s allies Syria and Venezuela this week.
Get a clue people — He’s sympathetic to Islamists (if he isn’t REALLY one himself) and he is a Statist (whether “marxist” or “fascist” — the label doesn’t much matter — especially when you are looking down the barrel of the despot’s guns).
Bill O was just keeping it pithy. His show prep is ridiculous these days. Sick of him being out of the loop and then acting as an authority.
The biggest losers in the world are not in Iran...but in homes across the nation who voted the biggest loser of them all into office...Barack Hussein Obama.
“America won its freedom by shedding the blood of British soldiers...”
And America is losing its freedom without so much as a drop of blood spilled.
Amazing, isn’t it?
Ask today’s conservative what he’s going to do about the falling of the USA and he’ll tell you how he can’t wait for the next election cycle.
The Iranians are resisting while Americans are eating and staring at their LCD television (that they bought on credit) hung on a wall in a house they can’t afford.
I mean, who needs to save freedom when we can watch TV, eat, fornicate, and otherwise mood-alter into oblivion?!
“It can’t happen here.”
Oh, I almost forgot, Rush Limbaugh is gonna save us.
Have you heard about the letter that bHo wrote to the mullahs before the election?....It was mentioned on Greta...with comment that more would come out tommorrow.
This is our last chance, and we’re blowing it because we have some evil POS quisling in the White House. The Mullahs want to bring about WWIII, and Obrother doesn’t want to get “involved”. Not choosing, allowing this to happen, is a choice. Your Father Below will be most pleased.
Thanks for the post/link (#115). Interesting. (and interesting CFR’st Haass was quoted)
And now Ahmadinejad is calling for Obama to apologize for his “interference”. Sad thing is, he probably will.
Interesting article about Iranian, Saeed Mortazavi.
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/06/23/iran-violent-crackdown-protesters-widens
Thanks to AnneDanmark at twubs for linking.
This is the change that liberals and black racists voted for.
North Korea threatening us, that too is the change that they voted for.
Unemployment at almost ten percent, they voted for that change too.
I’ll stop, the Kenyan is a traitor to our constitution, get used to many more bad things now that American power is under the control of a corrupt, black, Illinois politician who happens to be an uncompromising lying radical left wing politician. I say black, because it seems that 95% of them stick together based only on race. Totally sickening.
Blood on their hands!
:’( Thanks.
He’s too busy trying to come up with ways to ration healthcare to useful slaves.
......The United States of America should Declare War
on the Islamic Republic of Iran right now....
Why?
Why is it our business?
The world complained and hated America when we did something, now they are seeing what it looks like when we do nothing. I hope they enjoy.
truth is our nation has suffered from lack of experienced leadership for nearly two decades. We have elected younger men that, despite their governorship experience, did not have the right mix or temperment for the Presidency. So we can compile this problem out the next 8 or even 16 years by following the two parties leads or we can start our own search for someone with a strong understanding of the Constitution. Based on past successful leadership models they should:
1. Not be an academic or a lawyer (Reagan)
2. Have some military experience, but not too much (Teddy Roosevelt)
3. Be Constitutionalist (??)
4. Be strong in their words (F. Roosevelt)
5. Be a person of the land/a farmer (Washington)
6. Be able to communicate their message in laymens terms
7. Be honest
8. Be free of hollywood drama and influences
A few thoughts. There is a true conservative Constitutionalist Presidential candidate out there somewhere. Right now he is so disgusted with the vermin in power he is keeping his distance so as not to get rabies. However, the further away he gets from the vermin the closer he gets to his shotgun so he can take care of it. I imagine the one we’re looking for is a mix of Teddy Roosevelt and Andrew Jackson - at least that’s probably what we need right now. Definitely not a Woodrow Wilson or, Lord help us, Jimmy Carter. Unfortuantely the latter is what we seem to be dealing with. Once we do find such a person we must support him or her wholeheartedly and independently of either party. But no Bull-Moose or Perot nonesense. It should be an internet based party for efficiency. Call it the Reconstructionist party for that’s what we will be doing in the aftermath of the current policies.
As for the people of Iran, they need to fight and die for their freedom. Only then will they mature enough to handle democracy.
I am getting some physical reaction things happening as well. I am about ready to throw something.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.