Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editor quits after journal accepts bogus science article
The Guardian ^ | 18 June 2009 | Jessica Shepherd

Posted on 06/19/2009 10:31:05 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

The editor-in-chief of an academic journal has resigned after his publication accepted a hoax article.

The Open Information Science Journal failed to spot that the incomprehensible computer-generated paper was a fake. This was despite heavy hints from its authors, who claimed they were from the Centre for Research in Applied Phrenology – which forms the acronym Crap.

The journal, which claims to subject every paper to the scrutiny of other academics, so-called "peer review", accepted the paper.

Philip Davis, a graduate student at Cornell University in New York, who was behind the hoax, said he wanted to test the editorial standards of the journal's publisher, Bentham Science Publishers.

Davis had received unsolicited emails from Bentham asking him to submit papers to some of its 200+ journals that cover a wide range of subject matter from neuroscience to engineering.

If their papers are accepted, academics pay a fee in return for Bentham publishing the papers online. They can then be viewed by other academics for free.

Davis, with the help of Kent Anderson, a member of the publishing team at the New England Journal of Medicine, created the hoax computer science paper. The pair submitted their paper, Deconstructing Access Points, under false names. Four months later, they were told it had been accepted and the fee to have it published was $800 (almost £500).

Davis then withdrew the paper and revealed it as a hoax. Bambang Parmanto has since stepped down as editor-in-chief of the Open Information Science Journal. Parmanto told New Scientist that he never saw the paper.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cornell; godsgravesglyphs; hoax; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Big Science needs to start cleaning up its act.
1 posted on 06/19/2009 10:31:06 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

And now we know part of the reason why Global Warming is as “accepted” as it is.


2 posted on 06/19/2009 10:32:21 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

This was done several years ago with a sociology magazine, IIRC. The magazine was indignant when they were outed.


3 posted on 06/19/2009 10:33:08 AM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Exactly! The need for a cleanup is most apparent in the field of climate studies.

The problem with the “peer review” system is that it does nothing to prevent a tiny circle of whack-jobs from “peer reviewing” each other's spewings. Peer review is no guarantee of scientific validity; if your peers are all members of the tin-foil-hat brigade.

5 posted on 06/19/2009 10:38:34 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog
The “Sokal affair”. Read about it here (good for laughs):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
6 posted on 06/19/2009 10:40:26 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
This was despite heavy hints from its authors, who claimed they were from the Centre for Research in Applied Phrenology – which forms the acronym Crap.

Well, that and the fact that Phrenology is a well-known pseudoscience involving the analysis of bumps on the noggin...

7 posted on 06/19/2009 10:43:32 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

This is more embarrasing. Sokal’s targets were pomo social “scientists”, while this journal purports to be a peer-reviewed hard science journal.


8 posted on 06/19/2009 10:43:47 AM PDT by oblomov (Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. - Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

You sure it’s not a vanity press for cranks?


9 posted on 06/19/2009 10:46:36 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

That’s the one I was thinking about.


10 posted on 06/19/2009 10:55:37 AM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

SUch nice English boys....This happens a bunch with the Journal of Irreproducible Results. Which is real and which is phony? Of couse any research institute for phrenology shouldn’t be suspect should it?


11 posted on 06/19/2009 10:56:56 AM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I was the editor of a peer reviewed, scholarly journal
And I will tell you this could not have happened at my magazine.
Doesn’t of seem like everything is falling apart?


12 posted on 06/19/2009 10:59:37 AM PDT by Hildy (In Venezuela Coke Zero is bad for your h ealth. In the U.S. Zero on Coke is bad for your healthcare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Looks like the New England Journal of Medicine wanted to highlight the rather poor background of one of its rivals.


13 posted on 06/19/2009 11:00:08 AM PDT by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

True enough. Picking on pomo social “scientists” is tantamount to bullying the handicapped. Still, the hoax did reveal the absurdity of pomo philosophy, better than any legitimate academic debate could have ever done.


14 posted on 06/19/2009 11:00:51 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Why most published research results are false.
15 posted on 06/19/2009 11:07:23 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (AGWT is very robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it at the 100% confidence level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Centre for Research in Applied Phrenology

You've got to be pretty dumb not to catch this right off the bat. Phrenology has become almost a euphemism for pseudoscience. That alone wouldn't necessarily disqualify it, if not for the term apply. That pretty much tells you it's a joke. I'm guessing these nitwits don't even know what the word means.

16 posted on 06/19/2009 11:11:53 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

The editor-in-chief’s name is Bambang Parmanto? WTF?

ROFLMAO


17 posted on 06/19/2009 11:30:12 AM PDT by SolidRedState (Someone finally found a spine and it is attached to an Alaskan Governor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Mahmood Alam, Bentham's director of publications, told New Scientist: "In this particular case, we were aware that the article submitted was a hoax and we tried to find out the identity of the individual by pretending the article had been accepted for publication when in fact it was not."

This is a lie of course. Oh look it's a Muslim name. Other articles mention that payment is to be sent to a P.O. Box in Dubai.

18 posted on 06/19/2009 11:36:30 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Bambang Parmanto has since stepped down as editor-in-chief of the Open Information Science Journal.

What a cool name: "Bambang". It sounds familiar:


19 posted on 06/19/2009 11:38:48 AM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Peer Review, Publication in Top Journals, Scientific Consensus, and So Forth
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1963
Robert Higgs


20 posted on 06/19/2009 11:44:12 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Obamunists are nihilists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson