Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pipeline, Not Pipe Dream: Credit Palin
IBD Editorials ^ | June 12, 2009 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY

Posted on 06/12/2009 5:45:00 PM PDT by Kaslin

Energy: Exxon Mobil's surprise decision to join Trans-Canada on a vast Alaska gas pipeline project is a big step toward making the U.S. self-sufficient in domestic energy. By defying naysayers, Sarah Palin is now vindicated.


It must be sweet vindication for Alaska's governor. Against critics who said her 1,712-mile natural gas pipeline project would never get off the ground, who should the project bag but the "big gorilla" of American energy — Exxon Mobil.

In a major surprise, Exxon announced Thursday that it had forged a partnership with TransCanada, the Canadian pipeline company that holds the state license for Palin's $126 billion Alaska Gasoline Inducement Act project.

It's a big vote of confidence in Palin's top project from a by-the-books company known for its rigid investment standards.

"We evaluated all the options and it came down to our belief that this approach with TransCanada and Exxon Mobil was going to be the most successful project," said Marty Massey, U.S. joint interest manager of Exxon Mobil Production Co. He said Exxon might look at expanding its participation.

Rival oil firms had whispered to IBD that it would never happen. "It's gonna happen and we're very excited about this development," Palin told "Good Morning America" on Friday.

Doubters of Palin's pipeline plan were numerous.

Some said the pipeline would be too big to work, and that a rival BP/ConocoPhillips project, called Denali, would doom Palin's plan because Alaska didn't have enough natural gas for both.

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; energy; gas; palin; pipeline; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 06/12/2009 5:45:01 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes, and think of the jobs SHE will have helped create! Necessary, valuable jobs, not pretend stuff.


2 posted on 06/12/2009 5:48:50 PM PDT by brushcop (SFC Sallie, CPL Long, LTHarris, SSG Brown, PVT Simmons KIA OIF lll&V, they died for you, honor them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Now, who are you going to buy a right of way off of and how much are they willing to pay for it??? Where ye going to get the money??? China???


3 posted on 06/12/2009 5:50:51 PM PDT by org.whodat ("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brushcop

An amazing accomplishment.


4 posted on 06/12/2009 5:51:05 PM PDT by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Our gal is having a very big week.


5 posted on 06/12/2009 5:58:32 PM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
"Now, who are you going to buy a right of way off of and how much are they willing to pay for it??? Where ye going to get the money??? China??"

As I understand it, a lot of the ROW is in Canada. Alaska's ROW is more than likely across State or Federal lands. The oil companies involved do not necessarily operate ONLY in the U.S. but are multi-national and will be abble to adjust their budgets accordingly.

6 posted on 06/12/2009 6:04:52 PM PDT by redhead (Keep talking, Sarah. You're driving them NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Where ye going to get the money??? China???

Why not? Investing in a natural gas pipeline is obviously potentially more profitable than buying treasury bonds. Who knows? They might even attract some good old American we-earned-them-ourselves dollars.

What have "ye" to say about that? Never mind, I suspect I know. Blather.

7 posted on 06/12/2009 6:08:13 PM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Now, who are you going to buy a right of way off of and how much are they willing to pay for it??? Where ye going to get the money??? China???

Good point! Too bad neither Sarah Palin, Trans-Canada, or Exxon Mobil thought of right-of-way. You better get on the horn and let them know there's a problem they never even remotely considered in their massive deal.

BTW, your tagline: "Way past time for new commodities regulation" is dead wrong - it was the regulations that caused the collapse by forcing bad loans and thereby creating the market for the bad insurance schemes for those bad loans.

That's all for now.

8 posted on 06/12/2009 6:08:52 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

ROFLOL,


9 posted on 06/12/2009 6:10:04 PM PDT by org.whodat ("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: redhead
That means all you need is a majority vote in the congress to cross federal land. Correct???? I'm sure that will be a walk in the park???
10 posted on 06/12/2009 6:12:10 PM PDT by org.whodat ("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Oh, please. Exxon-Mobil could right a check out of petty cash to fund this project.


11 posted on 06/12/2009 6:14:23 PM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
"Way past time for new commodities regulation" is dead wrong - it was the regulations that caused the collapse by forcing bad loans and thereby creating the market for the bad insurance schemes for those bad loans.

Commodities and banking are two different things. The credit modernization act by Gramm caused the insurance BS and the CRA was attached to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, a republican bill. No where did it force the banks to finance 14+ millions unsold homes.

12 posted on 06/12/2009 6:19:48 PM PDT by org.whodat ("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: willgolfforfood

See # 10!!!


13 posted on 06/12/2009 6:21:00 PM PDT by org.whodat ("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
What have "ye" to say about that? Never mind, I suspect I know. Blather.

Your suspicions are in order. Palin could turn pyrites into gold and whodat would find fault.

14 posted on 06/12/2009 6:21:20 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What a remarkable woman. She can make the impossible happen, she didn’t listen to naysayers and she created jobs. Go Sarah 2012 can’t come soon enough!


15 posted on 06/12/2009 6:23:41 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
So Exxon-Mobil won't have enough cash left for a few discreet, well placed, political contributions to the right candidates? Re-election funds to the grease the wheels...along those lines?

That's how this game is played now. Likely, that's how it's been played for centuries.

No one with their available funds is adverse to buying a Senator or three, 'cause they damn sure are for sale.

16 posted on 06/12/2009 6:26:35 PM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hmmm...guess Alaskans, the Alaska legislature, other Alaska officials, Exxon-Mobil and Trans-Canada executives, didn’t consider Sarah Palin too much of a ‘folksy’ ‘lightweight’ to deal with this project, considering no other governor in the past 30 years was able to get it done.


17 posted on 06/12/2009 6:27:08 PM PDT by LucyJo ("...guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism...". George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I'm sure that will be a walk in the park???

Why don't you say what you really mean - "I hope it's not a walk in the park - I can't handle any more of Palin successes".
18 posted on 06/12/2009 6:27:33 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: brushcop
Yes, and think of the jobs SHE will have helped create! Necessary, valuable jobs, not pretend stuff.

Private sector not paid by the taxpayer jobs -- BUMP !!

19 posted on 06/12/2009 6:28:09 PM PDT by A message (3 years 7 months 1 week)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

If I had meant that I would have said it. My point is that so far nothing has been accomplished, you still have democrats in charge.


20 posted on 06/12/2009 6:29:59 PM PDT by org.whodat ("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson