Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fusion energy
The American Thinker ^ | June 12, 2009 | M. Simon

Posted on 06/12/2009 1:19:59 AM PDT by Scanian

There are a lot of fusion experiments going on in the world that don't get much publicity. Among these is Polywell Fusion. All you see in the papers is the billions spent on ITER or the billions spent on Laser Fusion. Small projects like Polywell where the spending is in millions and where the prospects for viability are near near term (years vs decades) don't seem to attract much attention from the giants of the media.

I have been studying the Polywell Fusion Reactor intensively since November of 2006 when I first saw a video of Robert Bussard, the inventor of the Polywell Fusion Reactor, giving a talk to Google. The talk is about an hour and a half long and is full of physics, engineering technical details, and prospects for the future if the device works. However, there is a much shorter video done by Daily Kos poster Roger Fox which gives a good overview of the technology. The video is not technically correct in every detail but it does give a good look for those of you short on physics, math, and engineering. As you can see this project transcends politics. I'm from the right side of the political spectrum with a rather libertarian orientation. Roger of course is from the left. Roger and I may disagree on many things but Polywell is not one of them.

There are also other resources out there. Tom Ligon, a noted science fiction author, who worked with Dr. Bussard wrote a piece for Analog Science Fiction magazine on the Polywell reactor which you can access here. Tom also did a series of videos about Polywell and his work with Dr. Bussard. You can also visit my IEC Fusion Technology blog which has news, technical discussions, and numerous useful links

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: energy; fusion; fusionenergy; physics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 06/12/2009 1:19:59 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Bump for later


2 posted on 06/12/2009 1:39:55 AM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
"So there you have it. At a cost of a few millions and about two more years of research or less we will know if we can use this method to power our civilization for the next billion years. And not just an Earth civilization. A multi-planet civilization. Exciting times."

"If it works."

yitbos

3 posted on 06/12/2009 1:46:57 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Ditto


4 posted on 06/12/2009 2:07:11 AM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Polywell is the only man-initiated fusion method that’s gone over break even at this point. It *does* work, the only issues left are engineering, not physics.


5 posted on 06/12/2009 2:34:21 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rammer

Bookmark


6 posted on 06/12/2009 3:04:12 AM PDT by Rammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
the only issues left are engineering economics, not physics.
7 posted on 06/12/2009 3:20:20 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (AGWT is very robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it at the 100% confidence level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

20y ago this engineer heard as a student fusion was 30y away.

One real product of fusion power is this magic fusion number: p=30. It is the one constant, seemlingly.

Commercial Fusion Power Date = Today() + p


8 posted on 06/12/2009 3:29:08 AM PDT by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

If the US government is going to toss around trillions of dollars, then I think tossing a few hundred billion at Fusion would seem to make as much sense as anything else.


9 posted on 06/12/2009 3:30:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We are a ruled people, serfs to the Federal Oligarchy -- and the Tree of Liberty thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04O8WjtLnxg


10 posted on 06/12/2009 3:45:54 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

It won’t free us from the maniacal grip of the lunatics in the Middle East. PC Liberals will make sure Muslims get a big cut or total control. The alternative, that Arabs pound sand and have nothing to sell but rugs, is unthinkable.


11 posted on 06/12/2009 3:47:01 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Ping.


12 posted on 06/12/2009 5:07:08 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

13 posted on 06/12/2009 5:19:46 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
While watching a presentation on this fusion technique, I ran across another absolutely fascinating energy discussion on the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor, which is a fission reactor that was developed at Oak Ridge National Labs in the 50's, but never caught on commercially. It has many advantages over conventional nuclear power plants, including cost, safety, size, availability of fuel, minimal nuclear waste, etc.
14 posted on 06/12/2009 6:12:51 AM PDT by SC DOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob; Robert A. Cook, PE

ping


15 posted on 06/12/2009 6:25:24 AM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|"AlsoSprachTelethustra"-NonValueAdded|Lk21:36|FireTheLiar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey; Scanian; sionnsar; Robert A. Cook, PE; Dead Corpse; Professional Engineer; SunkenCiv
"It won’t free us from the maniacal grip of the lunatics in the Middle East. PC Liberals will make sure Muslims get a big cut or total control."

Not gonna happen that way. This technology is too simple and too straightforward to be monopolized by anyone.

That includes your own friendly tyrannical government.

People are building these large vacuum tubes in their basements. Without a nuclear signature until it's actually fusing, it's hard to shut down backyard research.

One of the things we forget is that in the search for a "break-even" point, we're looking for something that outputs more energy than it takes in.

How about being willing to settle for something that produces one heck of a lot of heat for a modest investment in electricity and contraptioneering?

Most of the energy we consume at my compound is heat, usually from electricity. I'd sure like to have a tame fusion polywell water heater doing that job for me.

16 posted on 06/12/2009 3:39:36 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Error is patient. It has all of time for its disturbing machinations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SC DOC
Thanks SC DOC.
Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor
Google

17 posted on 06/12/2009 5:09:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

Thanks NicknamedBob!


18 posted on 06/12/2009 5:10:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Sun in a Bottle: The Strange History of Fusion and the Science of Wishful Thinking Sun in a Bottle:
The Strange History of Fusion
and the Science of Wishful Thinking

by Charles Seife


19 posted on 06/12/2009 5:10:23 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckrodgers

Ping


20 posted on 06/12/2009 5:21:29 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson