Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This has got to be the worst junk science article ever. Honestly, thank goodness I took control of my own health issues ....
1 posted on 06/11/2009 8:43:17 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Scythian

Or it could be because chimps don’t eat all the crap we eat.


2 posted on 06/11/2009 8:44:24 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
But for years, scientists have observed that chimps have a surprisingly low cancer rate compared to humans.

Gee, ya think that maybe some other cause may be in play here? Like, perhaps, I'm just spitballing here, our diets are hugely different?????

4 posted on 06/11/2009 8:45:15 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier presently instructing at Ft. Benning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Well, this is good news for most of those cackling old hens on The View. They should live forever.


5 posted on 06/11/2009 8:46:38 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (When you put Democrats in charge, stupid things happen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Did they adjust for age? Cancer is largely a disease of old age. Most wild animals slow down when they get to what we would consider middle aged and are either eaten or unable to catch what they need to eat, so they die before they get to the age when most human cancer cases happen.


6 posted on 06/11/2009 8:46:56 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

This is indeed Obama-class junk science.


7 posted on 06/11/2009 8:47:23 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

There are compensations for everything.


8 posted on 06/11/2009 8:47:43 AM PDT by Dan Middleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

That means that the government school system is actually reducing cancer risk by dumbing-down its students. Brilliant!


10 posted on 06/11/2009 8:54:12 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
Chimpanzees are thought to be the closest evolutionary relative to humans, and we share around 98 percent of our genes with these primates.

More recent studies say the number is around 90%. And when we are talking about 10% difference in literally billions of genes, that is a lot of difference.

11 posted on 06/11/2009 8:55:00 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

I knew there was a good reason for heavy drinking! Woohoo!


15 posted on 06/11/2009 9:02:44 AM PDT by Leisler ("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged."~G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

I’ve had three cocker spaniels. All died as a result of cancer. Lovely dogs, but each was only as bright as it needed to be to find the food bowl. Think I’ll let this theory develop for a bit before i embrace it.


16 posted on 06/11/2009 9:04:51 AM PDT by Kiss Me Hardy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Cancer also takes a while to get going. Usually the body has to endure insults for a while before something goes wrong and creates tumors. Unless I’m quite mistaken, Chimps don’t live that long in the wild, and those that are born with early-onset cancers like leukemia probably die very quickly, so that they are underrepresented in the population. We, being the sentimental saps we are, go to great lengths to keep sick members of the species alive, where most others do not, and those members subsequently make up a larger percentage of the population.


17 posted on 06/11/2009 9:06:24 AM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Islamofanatics" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Considering how many of of our fellow citizens sit in front of the tube absorbing all that mindless drivel everyday, I’d say we’re well on the way to a cure.


19 posted on 06/11/2009 9:08:23 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Oh wow. Maybe bananas cure cancer.


23 posted on 06/11/2009 9:15:08 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

So this is how they are going to explain the dumbing down of our children, lowering of test grades and graduating morons. It really is better for them, no risk of cancer that way, huh?


26 posted on 06/11/2009 9:27:19 AM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
Blame the headline writer. That isn't what the research indicates.

They're trying to link a decrease in apoptosis with an increase in neuronal tissue - not proven at the moment - and go from there to the speculation that this means less effective apoptosis defenses against cancer - an interesting hypothesis but also not yet proven. "More research is needed." No kidding.

43 posted on 06/11/2009 10:26:49 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

In general. If you live long enough you will get cancer.

All animals in the wild have shorter life spans than in captivity...if you die young of other causes you don’t get cancer.


47 posted on 06/11/2009 3:51:33 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson