[aft_lizard]

Yes an interesting juxtaposition isn’t it.

Delivery of life can not be done for evolution via an interplanetary delivery vehicle(ie: comet, meteorite etc...) which may or may not be true(although chemicals have been found to suggest at least the chemical equation be true).

However for ID to be held true an even tougher theory must be proven, that of a Creator. My faith alone is not enough to scientifically prove his existence.

Anyways I will exit this thread because the last time I got into a deep argument on this subject I pissed off both sides.

[chuck_the_tv_out]

“However for ID to be held true an even tougher theory must be proven, that of a Creator. My faith alone is not enough to scientifically prove his existence.”

Couple of points there. 1 - Intelligent design can be proved outside of any specific religion. 2 - Since evolution requires the same leaps of faith as do religions, it must not be taught with tax money, because of the 1st amendment. It serves absolutely no scientific purpose other that socio-religious worldview.

[muawiyah]

Let me humor you a moment ~ there are THREE SIDES, although two of them (the Evos and the Creos) refer all questions to God (Jehovah perhaps) or a demigod (Natural Selection).

Only the Intelligent Design/Panspermia folks point to something other than "magic".