Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Transportation Secretary Says He Wants to ‘Coerce People Out of Their Cars’
CNS News ^ | May 26, 2009 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 05/26/2009 5:42:24 AM PDT by SJackson

(CNSNews.com) - Transportation Secretary Ray Lahood told a group of reporters at the National Press Club on Thursday that he wants to “coerce people out of their cars.”

In Newsweek magazine last week, nationally syndicated columnist George Will published a piece critical of Lahood, entitled, “Ray Lahood, Transformed--Secretary of Behavior Modification.”

“He says he has joined a ‘transformational’ administration: ‘I think we can change people's behavior,’” Will reports that Lahood said over lunch.

Lahood, a former Republican congressman from Peoria, Ill., has become a champion of using the Department of Transportation and federal transportation spending to get people to take trains, busses, and ride bikes instead of driving cars.

At the National Press Club on Thursday he attempted to respond to George Will’s column and to explain his vision for using the power of government to change people’s transportation behavior and to change the nature of American residential communities.

“We want to really--and notwithstanding the fact that George Will doesn't like this idea--the idea of creating opportunities for people to get out of their cars--and we're working with the secretary of HUD, Shaun Donovan, on opportunities for housing, walking paths, biking paths,” said Lahood. “If somebody wants to ride their bike, if--to work or to the place of employment or to other places--mass transit, light rail--creating opportunities for what we call livable communities.”

The moderator of the press club event asked Lahood: “Some in the highway-supporters motorist groups have been concerned by your livability initiative. Is this an effort to make driving more torturous and to coerce people out of their cars?”

Lahood answered: “It is a way to coerce people out of their cars.

“Yeah,” he continued, “I mean, look, people don't like spending an hour and a half getting to work. And people don't like spending an hour going to the grocery store. And all of you who live around here know exactly what I'm talking about. You know, the dreaded thing is to have to run an errand on a weekend around here or to try and get home at 3:00 in the afternoon or even 5:00 in the afternoon.

“Now, look, every community is not going to be a livable community. But we have to create opportunities for people that do want to use a bicycle or want to walk or want to get on a streetcar or want to ride a light rail,” said Lahood.

Lahood suggested to the reporters that George Will is the only person opposed to using the government to promote mass transit and bicycling over driving a car.

“And the only person that I've heard of that objects to this is George Will. Check out Newsweek magazine,” said Lahood.

Lahood then made a joke about the fact that some conservatives believe that the way he wants to use the Department of Transportation represents an increased government intrusion in people’s lives.

“Some conservative groups are wary of the livable communities program, saying it's an example of government intrusion into people's lives,” said the moderator. “How do you respond?”

“About everything we do around here is government intrusion in people's lives,” said Lahood. “So have at it.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; bhodot; lahood; libs; lping; nannystate; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 next last
To: ml/nj
Apparently he said it, you'll find a couple hundred hits for the phrase.

"In a question-and-answer session following his remarks, Lahood expressed exasperation with the suggestion from some of his fellow Republicans that redirecting federal transportation money from highways to other modes of transportation amounted to government meddling in individual decisions.

"About everything we do around here is government intrusion into people's lives," he said.

"It is a way to coerce people out of their cars. Yeah."


141 posted on 05/26/2009 8:50:18 AM PDT by SJackson (in the fight against terrorism, no middle ground, half-measures leave you half-exposed, D. Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I stole this from the wikipedia article on Atlas Shrugged:

Rand characterizes the actions of government employees in a way that is consistent with public choice theory, describing how the language of altruism is used to pass legislation that is nominally in the public interest (e.g., the "Anti-Dog-Eat-Dog Rule," and "The Equalization of Opportunity Bill,") but which in reality serves special interests and government agencies at the expense of the public and the producers of value.

I like bike paths too. But, as you say, an idea which may have some merit seems to morph into something else -- something rather frightening.

142 posted on 05/26/2009 8:53:02 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We are a ruled people, serfs to the Federal Oligarchy -- and the Tree of Liberty thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
About 50 years ago the big three auto makers conspired to destroy the Street Car and electric bus companies and were socked by congress with a couple of thousand dollars in fines.

That myth has made the rounds of various left-wing sites for years, and even became a subplot for a movie of a few years back. Wikipedia devotes some space to it, if that means anything.

Please take a couple of minutes and read this article and note the references at the end if you want more truth rather than liberal conspiracy fiction.

Yes, streetcars were popular when the alternative was walking or hiring a horse and buggy. After the automobile got going in the early part of the 20th Century and mass-production made it affordable to the average working man (blame H. Ford), streetcars were considered not just slow transportation but a nuisance. Cities actively tried to get rid of them as bad for business.

143 posted on 05/26/2009 8:58:36 AM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
That was from the George Will column that LaHood took exception to. It was my intention to link to the column as well as the Antiplanner's brief comment, so here it is for the rest of you:

Ray Lahood, Transformed


144 posted on 05/26/2009 9:06:04 AM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: logician2u

Did the big three conspire and get fined for their conspiracy?

Yes they did, that is not a myth that is fact.

I did a little race once in New Orleans between my father in his car and me on a street car, not only did I beat him to the appointed destination but I did so by ten minutes.

Street cars are anything but slow, they spend most of their time coasting with the motors off or waiting for cars to get out of their way and electric buses were as fast as any diesel bus.

The biggest reason why cities removed street cars and electric buses from their transit systems were the tracks and the overhead wires. The Automotive industry sold the idea that they were ugly and dangerous.


145 posted on 05/26/2009 9:09:53 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
You can believe what you want. It's a free country (or it used to be).

If you like public transportation, as apparently you do, take it. Just don't be demanding the rest of us pay for it, or worse, live the "lifestyle" that accommodates it. I think that is the crux of the issue and the point of this article.

146 posted on 05/26/2009 9:24:31 AM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: logician2u

Thanks...I realized that and read them both earlier. I even posted the links on the Rush thread. ;)


147 posted on 05/26/2009 9:45:38 AM PDT by Roccus (The Capitol, the White House, the Court House...........America's Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Done toldja he really *is* “the new Lincoln”.

Y’all better start buying/renting copies of Mad Max.


148 posted on 05/26/2009 9:56:28 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed with Second Sight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Already own ‘em.

Signed,

Hummungus, Lord of the Waste Land


149 posted on 05/26/2009 9:59:21 AM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

I know you do...I meant the rest of the “y’alls”....:))

[or, to be grammatically correct “all y’alls”]


150 posted on 05/26/2009 10:04:23 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed with Second Sight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

“Bicycles are foe little kids!”

And best I can tell from looking around my city, “undocumented workers”.

And in case anybody is wondering no, that is not a code-word for anything. I believe it is a very direct statement.


151 posted on 05/26/2009 10:11:09 AM PDT by Gordon Greene (www.fracturedrepublic.com - Jesus said, "I am THE way, THE truth and THE life." Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

It works real well — takes forever to go from Norman to Fort Worth and then you need transportation when you get there. It would be even worse coming from Fort Worth to Norman unless you want to visit the Court House or Jail where the Railroad Station is located. It takes an hour longer then if I drive and cost more money. I will keep driving my SUV to Texas and skip The Heartland Flyer.

Only good time to take the Heartland Flyer is for OU/TX and they make special arrangements in Fort Worth for that trip along with specials on the train.


152 posted on 05/26/2009 11:11:23 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin for OK Governor in 2010! Mark Rubio for FL US Senator in 2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: logician2u

Does liking public transport make me a liberal?

I like street cars, and I know their value as machines.

Realistically one street car can move as many people from a suburban setting to a downtown area as 40 cars. In a continuous loop with a streetcar arriving every 2 to 5 minutes in a hour that can be the equivalent of 480 to 1200 cars per hour in a downtown parking garages or gridlock per hour.

Simple mathematics ought to tell anyone that if you can keep that many cars out of downtown areas people would be less stressed and the roads would be easier to travel.

Remember my original comment these people are idiots. they want to put everyone on bikes or in buses.


153 posted on 05/26/2009 11:47:30 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I remember another urban transformer that coerced people, from the cities to the countryside — Pol Pot. Mobility is the enemy of communism.


154 posted on 05/26/2009 1:48:20 PM PDT by TexasRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

155 posted on 05/26/2009 1:50:32 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Been saying this all along. Communists ... First your guns, then your mobility.


156 posted on 05/26/2009 1:53:53 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We either Free America ourselves, or it is midnight for humanity for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Hey, ho, let's go!


157 posted on 05/26/2009 4:53:59 PM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I despise these people.


158 posted on 05/26/2009 4:56:01 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ([Advocate for] Mitt Romney[?], God help you, but you're on the wrong website ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

You got that right.


159 posted on 05/26/2009 6:17:01 PM PDT by 383rr (Those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
to explain his vision

I swear to the great volcano God Yaweh that if one more of these mofos has a freakin "vision" for my damn life I just might go ballistic.

Or at least start working on a "Cancer List"...

160 posted on 05/26/2009 6:23:57 PM PDT by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson