Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Missing Link' Ida Is Just Media Hype
ICR ^ | May 20, 2009 | Christine Dao

Posted on 05/20/2009 7:58:38 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts

'Missing Link' Ida Is Just Media Hype

by Christine Dao*

Scientists and media outlets around the world are praising “Ida,” the primate fossil hailed as the long-sought-after “missing link” in the human evolutionary theory.

In a major public relations campaign, Ida was unveiled in New York City yesterday, May 19, 2009, and will make a stop in London May 26 before returning to its owners at the University of Oslo’s Natural History Museum. BBC1 will air a documentary based on the fossil the same day as its UK unveiling, and Little, Brown—publisher of the popular Twilight fiction series—put out a book about the find today. Even Internet search engine Google posted a special banner in Ida’s honor.

But despite the hype, a whirlwind of questions still surrounds the discovery. First, the environment in which the fossil was kept for 20 years is unclear. Ida, who bears the technical name Darwinius masillae in honor of this year’s 200th anniversary of British naturalist Charles Darwin’s birth, was found in 1983 by an amateur fossil hunter at Germany’s Messel Pit. He kept it in unknown conditions before deciding to sell it through a dealer two years ago.

Second, the purchaser’s stated motivation for obtaining the fossil seemed to emphasize business over research. University of Oslo paleontologist Jørn Hurum nicknamed the fossil “Ida” after his own small daughter and told UK news outlet The Guardian, “You need an icon or two in a museum to drag people in…this is our Mona Lisa and it will be our Mona Lisa for the next 100 years.”1 Hurum purchased the fossil for an undisclosed sum from the dealer based on seeing only three photographs and not the actual fossil, a “huge gamble” that suggests pressure to make some kind of return on the university’s investment.

Third, the fossil was hailed as humanity’s missing evolutionary link before the technical details of the find were published. This strategy effectively prevented the scientific community from evaluating the data and possibly calling a halt to the campaign on account of the fact that Ida has no transitional features and is therefore irrelevant to the evolutionary hypothesis of human development. Paleontologists are speaking out, but their voices are thus far being drowned out by the hype. Richard Kay from Duke University told Science that “the data is cherry-picked.”2

Ida, though an amazingly well-preserved fossil, will prove to be another Lucy, Java Man, Archaeopteryx, Confuciusornis, Pakicetus, and Eosimias. It will undoubtedly join the growing collection of fossils that were once thought to be missing links, but that upon further study turned out to be extinct creatures with no transitional features.

Look for more news soon on detailed analyses of Ida from ICR.

References

  1. Randerson, J. Fossil Ida: extraordinary find is ‘missing link’ in human evolution. The Guardian. Posted on guardian.co.uk May 19, 2009, accessed May 19, 2009.
  2. Gibbons, A. “Revolutionary” Fossil Fails to Dazzle Paleontologists. ScienceNOW Daily News. Posted on sciencenow.sciencemag.org May 19, 2009, accessed May 20, 2009.

Image Credit: PLoS

* Ms. Dao is Assistant Editor at the Institute for Creation Research.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation; darwiniusmasillae; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; goodgodimnutz; ida; intelligentdesign; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: jongaltsr; All

OK, where’s the obligatory shot of Helen Thomas????????


21 posted on 05/20/2009 9:38:29 PM PDT by Southbound ("A liar in public life is worse than a full-paid-up Communist, and I don't care who he is." - HST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I say again, this whole deal is preposterous. “Ida” is a stinking monkey and the problem with human evolution is at the top of the chain and not at the bottom (with monkeys). The neanderthal has been ruled out as a plausible human ancestor by DNA studies and all other hominids were further removed from us THAN the neanderthal. That leaves nothing on this planet we could be descended FROM via any process resembling evolution. They’d need some new hominid, closer to us in both time and morphology THAN the neanderthal and the works and remains of such a thing would be all over the map and very easy to find if it had ever existed.


22 posted on 05/21/2009 7:26:18 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

And let’s not forget that all the other upposedly ‘closely’ related evoltionary species were dated something significantly less than

47

MILLION

YEARS

AGO!!!


23 posted on 05/21/2009 10:33:17 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

upposedly = supposedly

or I guess it could be opposedly...


24 posted on 05/21/2009 10:34:19 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Warning!
This is a Meta-article that contains
no site-specific scientific data or research whatsoever
and is produced by a member of an obscure, unrecognized, non-scientific
internet group attempting to pass off his/her agenda as scholarly.
They are not constituted to provide proof of Creationism but instead
merely to snipe snidely and spam the internet with their Trollisms.
Buyer Beware!

25 posted on 05/21/2009 3:44:58 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (Creationists on the internet: The Ignorant, amplifying the Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
That means alot coming from a brainwashed Darwood-drone. LOL!

Now that you have completed your obligatory mantra, you may now return to pooring milk over your derwood-idols, "Dr." Michael.


26 posted on 05/21/2009 3:59:50 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson