I would be particularly interested to see if they included Argentinians from near Tierra del Fuego.
First word of the quoted sentence is what assures that this article is just one in an ongoing series of articles on the same subject.
Could be explained by multiple migrations originating from the same region/ethnic group, spaced over a few thousand years.
Just on the surface, this seems to have no end of problems associated with it. First of all, it seems to support the old Clovis culture theory, of a single founding NA culture, which is now perforated with exceptions, but still embraced for political reasons.
That is, if all NA peoples derive from the same ancestry, then they share a unique claim to the Americas. But if they don’t, some have more of a claim than others. This is why there is such intensive efforts to exclude any Caucasian ancients from American history, such as the Kennewick man, including the destruction of the archeological site where he was found.
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Pharmboy. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Indeed!!
Lamanite and Nephite!!
I’ve always believed they originally came across the land bridge that existed between North America and Asia. What I have never fully understood is why they would have split into so many different tribes especially in the greater United States. Is there anyone with some expertise on that subject?
Of course it does pose a very real problem for the proponents of those who believe that there are descendants of Mediterranean origin who formed these tribes.
translation: this is about protecting their casino rights.
this is just kenewick man revisited.
Thanks for the article.
Qx ping.
His name was Noah.
Hey Du, are you going to come here and tell us how flawed this study is?
.....How does this reconcile with the language evidence seemingly proving separate migrations......
Although the article said the 9 repeat allele had no biological function, it would appear that it did. The function was murderous aggression trait.
All the men were killed and the women enslaved. The previous migration populations were absorbed by warfare and attrition
Short version: “Native Americans” were the last migration to America. After they arrived, they murdered to extinction the earlier immigrants from Europe, who had arrived thousands of years earlier by following the glacial shore in small boats from what is now Spain to what is now Canada, hunting fish and mammals as they came in small groups in short steps.
That's the first thing I thought of as well.
How about separate incursions over thousands of years, from the same source of people ?
Does this mean Amerindians are more inbred?